These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20186441)

  • 21. Comparison between sheep and human cervical spines: an anatomic, radiographic, bone mineral density, and biomechanical study.
    Kandziora F; Pflugmacher R; Scholz M; Schnake K; Lucke M; Schröder R; Mittlmeier T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 May; 26(9):1028-37. PubMed ID: 11337621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Thoracic spine morphology of a pseudo-biped animal model (kangaroo) and comparisons with human and quadruped animals.
    Balasubramanian S; Peters JR; Robinson LF; Singh A; Kent RW
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Dec; 25(12):4140-4154. PubMed ID: 27704284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparative anatomy of the porcine and human thoracic spines with reference to thoracoscopic surgical techniques.
    Bozkus H; Crawford NR; Chamberlain RH; Valenzuela TD; Espinoza A; Yüksel Z; Dickman CA
    Surg Endosc; 2005 Dec; 19(12):1652-65. PubMed ID: 16211439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Limitations of the cervical porcine spine in evaluating spinal implants in comparison with human cervical spinal segments: a biomechanical in vitro comparison of porcine and human cervical spine specimens with different instrumentation techniques.
    Schmidt R; Richter M; Claes L; Puhl W; Wilke HJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jun; 30(11):1275-82. PubMed ID: 15928552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The porcine cervical spine as a model of the human lumbar spine: an anatomical, geometric, and functional comparison.
    Yingling VR; Callaghan JP; McGill SM
    J Spinal Disord; 1999 Oct; 12(5):415-23. PubMed ID: 10549707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Measurement of the vertebral pedicle in children].
    Zhang Y; Zheng XF; Li JY
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2007 Aug; 27(8):1196-8. PubMed ID: 17715025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Pedicle morphometry in the upper thoracic spine: limits to safe screw placement in older patients.
    McLain RF; Ferrara L; Kabins M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Nov; 27(22):2467-71. PubMed ID: 12435976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Safe corridor for the implantation of thoracolumbar pedicle screws in growing pigs: A morphometric study.
    Cachon T; Pillard P; Odent T; Carozzo C; Viguier E
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0184857. PubMed ID: 29059193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A cadaveric examination of pediatric cervical pedicle morphology.
    Vara CS; Thompson GH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 May; 31(10):1107-12. PubMed ID: 16648744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Geometrical dimensions of the lower lumbar vertebrae--analysis of data from digitised CT images.
    Zhou SH; McCarthy ID; McGregor AH; Coombs RR; Hughes SP
    Eur Spine J; 2000 Jun; 9(3):242-8. PubMed ID: 10905444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Variations in vertebral body dimensions in women measured by 3D-XA: a longitudinal in vivo study.
    Kolta S; Kerkeni S; Travert C; Skalli W; Eastell R; Glüer CC; Roux C
    Bone; 2012 Mar; 50(3):777-83. PubMed ID: 22207276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Part I: Morphometric analysis of the thoracic vertebrae.
    Vaccaro AR; Rizzolo SJ; Allardyce TJ; Ramsey M; Salvo J; Balderston RA; Cotler JM
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1995 Aug; 77(8):1193-9. PubMed ID: 7642664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Is sheep lumbar spine a suitable alternative model for human spinal researches? Morphometrical comparison study.
    Mageed M; Berner D; Jülke H; Hohaus C; Brehm W; Gerlach K
    Lab Anim Res; 2013 Dec; 29(4):183-9. PubMed ID: 24396382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Regional differences in anatomical landmarks for placing anterior instrumentation of the thoracic spine in both normal patients and patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
    Zhang H; Sucato DJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Jan; 31(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 16418638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Relationship of cervical spinal cord diameter to vertebral dimensions: a radiographic study of normal dogs.
    Fourie SL; Kirberger RM
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 1999; 40(2):137-43. PubMed ID: 10225524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Morphometric analysis of thoracic and lumbar vertebrae in idiopathic scoliosis.
    Liljenqvist UR; Link TM; Halm HF
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 May; 25(10):1247-53. PubMed ID: 10806501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Applied anatomical study on approach next to erector spinae for spinal canal decompression through intervertebral foramen].
    Xu X; Yan Z; Huang F; Qiu B; Deng Z
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Apr; 27(4):409-13. PubMed ID: 23757865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of the assumptions used to derive an ideal normal cervical spine model.
    Harrison DD; Janik TJ; Troyanovich SJ; Harrison DE; Colloca CJ
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1997 May; 20(4):246-56. PubMed ID: 9168409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Thoracic human vertebrae. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy.
    Panjabi MM; Takata K; Goel V; Federico D; Oxland T; Duranceau J; Krag M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1991 Aug; 16(8):888-901. PubMed ID: 1948374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The accuracy of a method for printing three-dimensional spinal models.
    Wu AM; Shao ZX; Wang JS; Yang XD; Weng WQ; Wang XY; Xu HZ; Chi YL; Lin ZK
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0124291. PubMed ID: 25915641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.