These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20186479)

  • 1. Prediction of carcinogenicity for diverse chemicals based on substructure grouping and SVM modeling.
    Tanabe K; Lučić B; Amić D; Kurita T; Kaihara M; Onodera N; Suzuki T
    Mol Divers; 2010 Nov; 14(4):789-802. PubMed ID: 20186479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of chemical carcinogenicity by machine learning approaches.
    Tan NX; Rao HB; Li ZR; Li XY
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2009; 20(1-2):27-75. PubMed ID: 19343583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improvement of carcinogenicity prediction performances based on sensitivity analysis in variable selection of SVM models.
    Tanabe K; Kurita T; Nishida K; Lučić B; Amić D; Suzuki T
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2013; 24(7):565-80. PubMed ID: 23350528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Application of a developed triple-classification machine learning model for carcinogenic prediction of hazardous organic chemicals to the US, EU, and WHO based on Chinese database.
    Hao N; Sun P; Zhao W; Li X
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2023 Apr; 255():114806. PubMed ID: 36948010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of rodent carcinogenic potential of naturally occurring chemicals in the human diet using high-throughput QSAR predictive modeling.
    Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Chanderbhan RF; Contrera JF
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 222(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17482223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. First report on development of quantitative interspecies structure-carcinogenicity relationship models and exploring discriminatory features for rodent carcinogenicity of diverse organic chemicals using OECD guidelines.
    Kar S; Roy K
    Chemosphere; 2012 Apr; 87(4):339-55. PubMed ID: 22225702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Carcinogenicity prediction of noncongeneric chemicals by a support vector machine.
    Zhong M; Nie X; Yan A; Yuan Q
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2013 May; 26(5):741-9. PubMed ID: 23577695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting carcinogenicity of diverse chemicals using probabilistic neural network modeling approaches.
    Singh KP; Gupta S; Rai P
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2013 Oct; 272(2):465-75. PubMed ID: 23856075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting the carcinogenic potential of pharmaceuticals in rodents using molecular structural similarity and E-state indices.
    Contrera JF; Matthews EJ; Daniel Benz R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2003 Dec; 38(3):243-59. PubMed ID: 14623477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Novel naïve Bayes classification models for predicting the carcinogenicity of chemicals.
    Zhang H; Cao ZX; Li M; Li YZ; Peng C
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2016 Nov; 97():141-149. PubMed ID: 27597133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative and qualitative models for carcinogenicity prediction for non-congeneric chemicals using CP ANN method for regulatory uses.
    Fjodorova N; Vračko M; Tušar M; Jezierska A; Novič M; Kühne R; Schüürmann G
    Mol Divers; 2010 Aug; 14(3):581-94. PubMed ID: 19685274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of QSAR models for predicting hepatocarcinogenic toxicity of chemicals.
    Massarelli I; Imbriani M; Coi A; Saraceno M; Carli N; Bianucci AM
    Eur J Med Chem; 2009 Sep; 44(9):3658-64. PubMed ID: 19272677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computer-aided rodent carcinogenicity prediction.
    Lagunin AA; Dearden JC; Filimonov DA; Poroikov VV
    Mutat Res; 2005 Oct; 586(2):138-46. PubMed ID: 16112600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. QSAR study for carcinogenicity in a large set of organic compounds.
    Duchowicz PR; Comelli NC; Ortiz EV; Castro EA
    Curr Drug Saf; 2012 Sep; 7(4):282-8. PubMed ID: 23062240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of cell viability assay data improves the prediction accuracy of conventional quantitative structure-activity relationship models of animal carcinogenicity.
    Zhu H; Rusyn I; Richard A; Tropsha A
    Environ Health Perspect; 2008 Apr; 116(4):506-13. PubMed ID: 18414635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. QNA-based 'Star Track' QSAR approach.
    Filimonov DA; Zakharov AV; Lagunin AA; Poroikov VV
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2009 Oct; 20(7-8):679-709. PubMed ID: 20024804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Classification of the carcinogenicity of N-nitroso compounds based on support vector machines and linear discriminant analysis.
    Luan F; Zhang R; Zhao C; Yao X; Liu M; Hu Z; Fan B
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2005 Feb; 18(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 15720123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A topological substructural approach applied to the computational prediction of rodent carcinogenicity.
    Helguera AM; Cabrera Pérez MA; González MP; Ruiz RM; González Díaz H
    Bioorg Med Chem; 2005 Apr; 13(7):2477-88. PubMed ID: 15755650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In Silico Estimation of Chemical Carcinogenicity with Binary and Ternary Classification Methods.
    Li X; Du Z; Wang J; Wu Z; Li W; Liu G; Shen X; Tang Y
    Mol Inform; 2015 Apr; 34(4):228-35. PubMed ID: 27490168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. CORAL: QSAR models for carcinogenicity of organic compounds for male and female rats.
    Toropova AP; Toropov AA
    Comput Biol Chem; 2018 Feb; 72():26-32. PubMed ID: 29310001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.