190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20186487)
1. Single camera photogrammetry system for EEG electrode identification and localization.
Baysal U; Sengül G
Ann Biomed Eng; 2010 Apr; 38(4):1539-47. PubMed ID: 20186487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A single camera photogrammetry system for multi-angle fast localization of EEG electrodes.
Qian S; Sheng Y
Ann Biomed Eng; 2011 Nov; 39(11):2844-56. PubMed ID: 21818532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Geodesic photogrammetry for localizing sensor positions in dense-array EEG.
Russell GS; Jeffrey Eriksen K; Poolman P; Luu P; Tucker DM
Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 May; 116(5):1130-40. PubMed ID: 15826854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Variability of electrode positions using electrode caps.
Atcherson SR; Gould HJ; Pousson MA; Prout TM
Brain Topogr; 2007; 20(2):105-11. PubMed ID: 17929157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A semi-automatic method to determine electrode positions and labels from gel artifacts in EEG/fMRI-studies.
de Munck JC; van Houdt PJ; Verdaasdonk RM; Ossenblok PP
Neuroimage; 2012 Jan; 59(1):399-403. PubMed ID: 21784161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automated detection and labeling of high-density EEG electrodes from structural MR images.
Marino M; Liu Q; Brem S; Wenderoth N; Mantini D
J Neural Eng; 2016 Oct; 13(5):056003. PubMed ID: 27484621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of electrode density and measurement noise on the spatial resolution of cortical potential distribution.
Ryynänen OR; Hyttinen JA; Laarne PH; Malmivuo JA
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Sep; 51(9):1547-54. PubMed ID: 15376503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. General bounds for electrode mislocation on the EEG inverse problem.
Beltrachini L; von Ellenrieder N; Muravchik CH
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2011 Jul; 103(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 20599288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automated landmark extraction for orthodontic measurement of faces using the 3-camera photogrammetry methodology.
Deli R; Di Gioia E; Galantucci LM; Percoco G
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jan; 21(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 20072024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spatial localization of EEG electrodes using 3D scanning.
Taberna GA; Marino M; Ganzetti M; Mantini D
J Neural Eng; 2019 Apr; 16(2):026020. PubMed ID: 30634182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tri-polar concentric ring electrode development for laplacian electroencephalography.
Besio WG; Koka K; Aakula R; Dai W
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 May; 53(5):926-33. PubMed ID: 16686415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automatic camera-based identification and 3-D reconstruction of electrode positions in electrocardiographic imaging.
Schulze WH; Mackens P; Potyagaylo D; Rhode K; Tülümen E; Schimpf R; Papavassiliu T; Borggrefe M; Dössel O
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2014 Dec; 59(6):515-28. PubMed ID: 25229412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Photogrammetry-Based Head Digitization for Rapid and Accurate Localization of EEG Electrodes and MEG Fiducial Markers Using a Single Digital SLR Camera.
Clausner T; Dalal SS; Crespo-García M
Front Neurosci; 2017; 11():264. PubMed ID: 28559791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improvement of spatial selectivity and decrease of mutual information of tri-polar concentric ring electrodes.
Koka K; Besio WG
J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Sep; 165(2):216-22. PubMed ID: 17681379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors limiting the application of electrical impedance tomography for identification of regional conductivity changes using scalp electrodes during epileptic seizures in humans.
Fabrizi L; Sparkes M; Horesh L; Perez-Juste Abascal JF; McEwan A; Bayford RH; Elwes R; Binnie CD; Holder DS
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S163-74. PubMed ID: 16636408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative study of different references for EEG spectral mapping: the issue of the neutral reference and the use of the infinity reference.
Yao D; Wang L; Oostenveld R; Nielsen KD; Arendt-Nielsen L; Chen AC
Physiol Meas; 2005 Jun; 26(3):173-84. PubMed ID: 15798293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dipole estimation errors due to differences in modeling anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis.
Hallez H; Vanrumste B; Van Hese P; Delputte S; Lemahieu I
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Apr; 53(7):1877-94. PubMed ID: 18364544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of EEG electrode number on epileptic source localization in pediatric patients.
Sohrabpour A; Lu Y; Kankirawatana P; Blount J; Kim H; He B
Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Mar; 126(3):472-80. PubMed ID: 25088733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of measurement noise and electrode density on the spatial resolution of cortical potential distribution with different resistivity values for the skull.
Ryynänen OR; Hyttinen JA; Malmivuo JA
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Sep; 53(9):1851-8. PubMed ID: 16941841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bipolar electrode selection for a motor imagery based brain-computer interface.
Lou B; Hong B; Gao X; Gao S
J Neural Eng; 2008 Sep; 5(3):342-9. PubMed ID: 18756030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
