These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2018693)

  • 1. The 5-year results of a clinical trial comparing a glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement restoration with an amalgam restoration.
    Welbury RR; Walls AW; Murray JJ; McCabe JF
    Br Dent J; 1991 Mar; 170(5):177-81. PubMed ID: 2018693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of paired compomer and glass ionomer restorations in primary molars: final results after 42 months.
    Welbury RR; Shaw AJ; Murray JJ; Gordon PH; McCabe JF
    Br Dent J; 2000 Jul; 189(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 10975160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations.
    Donly KJ; Segura A; Kanellis M; Erickson RL
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Oct; 130(10):1459-66. PubMed ID: 10570589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.
    Yengopal V; Harneker SY; Patel N; Siegfried N
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Apr; (2):CD004483. PubMed ID: 19370602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Eight-year study on conventional glass ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth.
    Qvist V; Laurberg L; Poulsen A; Teglers PT
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2004 Feb; 62(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 15124781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A clinical comparison of glass ionomer (polyalkenoate) and silver amalgam restorations in the treatment of Class 5 caries in xerostomic head and neck cancer patients.
    Wood RE; Maxymiw WG; McComb D
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(3):94-102. PubMed ID: 8415169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Six-year success rates of occlusal amalgam and glass-ionomer restorations placed using three minimal intervention approaches.
    Mandari GJ; Frencken JE; van't Hof MA
    Caries Res; 2003; 37(4):246-53. PubMed ID: 12771499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical evaluation of glass ionomer-silver cermet restorations in primary molars: one year results.
    Hung TW; Richardson AS
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1990 Mar; 56(3):239-40. PubMed ID: 2110027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Longevity and cariostatic effects of everyday conventional glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth: three-year results.
    Qvist V; Laurberg L; Poulsen A; Teglers PT
    J Dent Res; 1997 Jul; 76(7):1387-96. PubMed ID: 9207772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of a reinforced glass-ionomer cermet for the restoration of primary molars: a clinical trial.
    Kilpatrick NM; Murray JJ; McCabe JF
    Br Dent J; 1995 Sep; 179(5):175-9. PubMed ID: 7546970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness of glass-ionomer (ART) and amalgam restorations in the deciduous dentition: results after 3 years.
    Taifour D; Frencken JE; Beiruti N; van 't Hof MA; Truin GJ
    Caries Res; 2002; 36(6):437-44. PubMed ID: 12459617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical performance of resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in primary teeth. A retrospective evaluation.
    Croll TP; Bar-Zion Y; Segura A; Donly KJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Aug; 132(8):1110-6. PubMed ID: 11575018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cements in the deciduous dentition.
    Walls AW; Murray JJ; McCabe JF
    Br Dent J; 1988 Jul; 165(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 3165643
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lack of effect of fluoride releasing resin modified glass ionomer restorations on the contacting surface of adjacent primary molars. a clinical prospective study.
    Kotsanos N; Dionysopoulos P
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2004 Sep; 5(3):136-42. PubMed ID: 15471520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer cement in Class II restorations in primary molars--a three year clinical evaluation.
    Ostlund J; Möller K; Koch G
    Swed Dent J; 1992; 16(3):81-6. PubMed ID: 1496459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Enamel remineralization on teeth adjacent to Class II glass ionomer restorations.
    Segura A; Donly KJ; Stratmann RG
    Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):247-50. PubMed ID: 9522700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A study of primary teeth restored by intracoronal restorations in children participating in an undergraduate teaching programme at Cork University Dental School and Hospital, Ireland.
    Hurley E; Da Mata C; Stewart C; Kinirons M
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2015 Mar; 16(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 25793959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The management of occlusal caries in permanent molars. A 5-year clinical trial comparing a minimal composite with an amalgam restoration.
    Welbury RR; Walls AW; Murray JJ; McCabe JF
    Br Dent J; 1990 Dec 8-22; 169(11):361-6. PubMed ID: 2275837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Retrospective Study of the 3-Year Survival Rate of Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement Class II Restorations in Primary Molars.
    Webman M; Mulki E; Roldan R; Arevalo O; Roberts JF; Garcia-Godoy F
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 26696100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Class II amalgam restorations, glass-ionomer tunnel restorations, and caries development on adjacent tooth surfaces: a 3-year clinical study.
    Svanberg M
    Caries Res; 1992; 26(4):315-8. PubMed ID: 1423449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.