These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
27. A comparison of glass cermet cement and amalgam restorations in primary molars. Hickel R; Voss A ASDC J Dent Child; 1990; 57(3):184-8. PubMed ID: 2111833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial. Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A clinical study of adhesive amalgam in pediatric dental practice. Cannon ML; Tylka JA; Sandrik J Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1999 Apr; 20(4):331-4, 336, 338 passim; quiz 344. PubMed ID: 11692340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study. Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months. Gao W; Peng D; Smales RJ; Yip KH Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Replacements of restorations in the primary and young permanent dentition. Wendt LK; Koch G; Birkhed D Swed Dent J; 1998; 22(4):149-55. PubMed ID: 9850557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Stainless steel crown versus modified open-sandwich restorations for primary molars: a 2-year randomized clinical trial. Atieh M Int J Paediatr Dent; 2008 Sep; 18(5):325-32. PubMed ID: 18328050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Three restorative materials and topical fluoride gel used in xerostomic patients: a clinical comparison. Haveman CW; Summitt JB; Burgess JO; Carlson K J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Feb; 134(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 12636121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Amalgam and ART restorations in children: a controlled clinical trial. de Amorim RG; Leal SC; Mulder J; Creugers NH; Frencken JE Clin Oral Investig; 2014 Jan; 18(1):117-24. PubMed ID: 23455576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results. Casagrande L; Dalpian DM; Ardenghi TM; Zanatta FB; Balbinot CE; García-Godoy F; De Araujo FB Am J Dent; 2013 Dec; 26(6):351-5. PubMed ID: 24640441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Time required to remove totally bonded tooth-colored posterior restorations and related tooth substance loss. Krejci I; Lieber CM; Lutz F Dent Mater; 1995 Jan; 11(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 7498606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Clinical evaluation of a glass ionomer cement in primary molars. Rutar J; McAllan L; Tyas MJ Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(6):486-8. PubMed ID: 11132508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]