These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2018693)

  • 21. The 5-year results of a clinical trial comparing a glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement restoration with an amalgam restoration.
    Billington RW; Williams J; Pearson GJ
    Br Dent J; 1991 Jun; 170(12):431. PubMed ID: 2069824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparative study of plaque mutans streptococci levels in children receiving glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations.
    Ertuğrul F; Eltem R; Eronat C
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 12762601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effectiveness of three minimal intervention approaches for managing dental caries: survival of restorations after 2 years.
    Mandari GJ; Truin GJ; van't Hof MA; Frencken JE
    Caries Res; 2001; 35(2):90-4. PubMed ID: 11275667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Silver amalgam versus resin modified GIC class-II restorations in primary molars: twelve month clinical evaluation.
    Dutta BN; Gauba K; Tewari A; Chawla HS
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2001 Sep; 19(3):118-22. PubMed ID: 11817797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. 'The 5-year results of a clinical trial comparing a glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement restoration with an amalgam restoration'.
    Billington RW; Williams J; Pearson GJ
    Br Dent J; 1991 Oct; 171(8):238. PubMed ID: 1804269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessment of glass polyalkenoate restorations in primary molar teeth.
    Attwood D; Reid JS; Evans D
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1994 Jun; 2(4):183-5. PubMed ID: 8603144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of glass cermet cement and amalgam restorations in primary molars.
    Hickel R; Voss A
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1990; 57(3):184-8. PubMed ID: 2111833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
    Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A clinical study of adhesive amalgam in pediatric dental practice.
    Cannon ML; Tylka JA; Sandrik J
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1999 Apr; 20(4):331-4, 336, 338 passim; quiz 344. PubMed ID: 11692340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
    Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months.
    Gao W; Peng D; Smales RJ; Yip KH
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Replacements of restorations in the primary and young permanent dentition.
    Wendt LK; Koch G; Birkhed D
    Swed Dent J; 1998; 22(4):149-55. PubMed ID: 9850557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Stainless steel crown versus modified open-sandwich restorations for primary molars: a 2-year randomized clinical trial.
    Atieh M
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2008 Sep; 18(5):325-32. PubMed ID: 18328050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Three restorative materials and topical fluoride gel used in xerostomic patients: a clinical comparison.
    Haveman CW; Summitt JB; Burgess JO; Carlson K
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Feb; 134(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 12636121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Amalgam and ART restorations in children: a controlled clinical trial.
    de Amorim RG; Leal SC; Mulder J; Creugers NH; Frencken JE
    Clin Oral Investig; 2014 Jan; 18(1):117-24. PubMed ID: 23455576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results.
    Casagrande L; Dalpian DM; Ardenghi TM; Zanatta FB; Balbinot CE; García-Godoy F; De Araujo FB
    Am J Dent; 2013 Dec; 26(6):351-5. PubMed ID: 24640441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Time required to remove totally bonded tooth-colored posterior restorations and related tooth substance loss.
    Krejci I; Lieber CM; Lutz F
    Dent Mater; 1995 Jan; 11(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 7498606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical evaluation of a glass ionomer cement in primary molars.
    Rutar J; McAllan L; Tyas MJ
    Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(6):486-8. PubMed ID: 11132508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Restoration of pediatric posterior teeth.
    Christensen GJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1996 Jan; 127(1):106-8. PubMed ID: 8568086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Clinical aspects of restorative treatment in the primary dentition.
    Varpio M
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1993; 96():1-47. PubMed ID: 8310420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.