These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2018745)

  • 1. Comparison of nonabsorbable and absorbable sutures for use in oculoplastic surgery.
    Linberg JV; Mangano LM; Odom JV
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 1991; 7(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 2018745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures in microsurgery: standardized comparable studies in rats.
    Thiede A; Lütjohann K; Beck C; Blunck F
    J Microsurg; 1979; 1(3):216-22. PubMed ID: 16317948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance comparison of nylon and an absorbable suture material (Polyglactin 910) in the closure of punch biopsy sites.
    Gabel EA; Jimenez GP; Eaglstein WH; Kerdel FA; Falanga V
    Dermatol Surg; 2000 Aug; 26(8):750-2; discussion 752-3. PubMed ID: 10940061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Photographic assessment of postsurgical facial scars epidermally sutured with rapidly absorbable polyglactin 910 or nylon: A randomized clinical trial.
    Moran B; Humphrey S; Seal A; Berkowitz J; Zloty D
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2020 Nov; 83(5):1395-1399. PubMed ID: 32534080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures for repair of achilles tendon rupture with a suture-guiding device.
    Kocaoglu B; Ulku TK; Gereli A; Karahan M; Turkmen M
    Foot Ankle Int; 2015 Jun; 36(6):691-5. PubMed ID: 25941197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures for microsurgical vasovasostomy in rats.
    Sheynkin YR; Li PS; Magid ML; Carlson D; Chen EC; Goldstein M
    Urology; 1999 Jun; 53(6):1235-8. PubMed ID: 10367861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nonabsorbable versus absorbable sutures in large, hang-back medial rectus muscle recessions.
    Awadein A; Marsh JD; Guyton DL
    J AAPOS; 2016 Jun; 20(3):206-9. PubMed ID: 27138809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative analysis of non-absorbable 10-0 nylon sutures with absorbable 10-0 Vicryl sutures in pediatric cataract surgery.
    Matalia J; Panmand P; Ghalla P
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2018 May; 66(5):661-664. PubMed ID: 29676310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Buried absorbable polyglactin 910 sutures do not result in stronger wounds in porcine full thickness skin incisions.
    Townsend KL; Lear W; Robertson BL; Kruzic JJ
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Oct; 63():386-389. PubMed ID: 27454524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The efficacy of absorbable suture for microvascular anastomoses.
    Fried MP; Caminear DS; Sloman-Moll ER
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1990 Sep; 116(9):1051-4. PubMed ID: 2200441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Microsurgical nerve and blood vessel sutures using a resorbable suture material].
    Ippisch A; Wriedt-Lübbe I; Duspiva W; Blümel G
    Z Plast Chir; 1980 Jun; 4(2):67-80. PubMed ID: 7006240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Synthetic absorbable and nonabsorbable microsutures: a histological comparison.
    Driscoll GL; Baird PJ; Merkelbach PJ; Smith DH
    Clin Reprod Fertil; 1982 Jun; 1(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 7186830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of 7/0 Vicryl (coated polyglactin 910) and 7/0 Vicryl-rapide (irradiated polyglactin 910) in skin closure in ophthalmic plastic surgery.
    Talbot AW; Meadows AE; Tyers AG; Shah-Desai S
    Orbit; 2002 Mar; 21(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 12029576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adhesion formation to incisional abdominal wound in response to polyamide "6" and polyglactin "910" sutures.
    Ansari AG
    J Pak Med Assoc; 1992 Aug; 42(8):184-5. PubMed ID: 1433796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A randomized, controlled trial comparing long-term cosmetic outcomes of traumatic pediatric lacerations repaired with absorbable plain gut versus nonabsorbable nylon sutures.
    Karounis H; Gouin S; Eisman H; Chalut D; Pelletier H; Williams B
    Acad Emerg Med; 2004 Jul; 11(7):730-5. PubMed ID: 15231459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Tissue reaction in microvessel anastomoses. Comparative study of resorbable and nonresorbable suture material].
    Kaletsch B; Rehm KE; Stambolis C
    Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 1982; 14(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 6763589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical Outcomes of Bridge-enhanced Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair Are Influenced by Sex in a Preclinical Model.
    Kiapour AM; Fleming BC; Murray MM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Aug; 473(8):2599-608. PubMed ID: 25742916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Controlled clinical trial of three suture materials for abdominal wall closure after bowl operations.
    Corman ML; Veidenheimer MC; Coller JA
    Am J Surg; 1981 Apr; 141(4):510-13. PubMed ID: 6452825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Scientific basis for the selection of skin closure techniques.
    Edlich RF; Gubler K; Wallis AG; Clark JJ; Dahlstrom JJ; Long WB
    J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol; 2010; 29(4):363-72. PubMed ID: 21284598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Foot and Ankle Surgical Incision Closure With Three Different Materials.
    Yao D; Nachtsheim J; Ettinger S; Altemeier A; Claassen L; Plaass C; Schwarze M; Daniilidis K; Brüggenjürgen B; Stukenborg-Colsman C; Lerch M
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2022; 61(4):760-765. PubMed ID: 35370050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.