839 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20188021)
1. Comparison of case note review methods for evaluating quality and safety in health care.
Hutchinson A; Coster JE; Cooper KL; McIntosh A; Walters SJ; Bath PA; Pearson M; Young TA; Rantell K; Campbell MJ; Ratcliffe J
Health Technol Assess; 2010 Feb; 14(10):iii-iv, ix-x, 1-144. PubMed ID: 20188021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A structured judgement method to enhance mortality case note review: development and evaluation.
Hutchinson A; Coster JE; Cooper KL; Pearson M; McIntosh A; Bath PA
BMJ Qual Saf; 2013 Dec; 22(12):1032-40. PubMed ID: 23868866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
Allen D; Rixson L
Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Profiling quality of care: Is there a role for peer review?
Hofer TP; Asch SM; Hayward RA; Rubenstein LV; Hogan MM; Adams J; Kerr EA
BMC Health Serv Res; 2004 May; 4(1):9. PubMed ID: 15151701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A methodological study to compare survey-based and observation-based evaluations of organisational and safety cultures and then compare both approaches with markers of the quality of care.
Freeth D; Sandall J; Allan T; Warburton F; Berridge EJ; Mackintosh N; Rogers M; Abbott S
Health Technol Assess; 2012 May; 16(25):iii-iv, 1-184. PubMed ID: 22587942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measuring disease activity and damage in discoid lupus erythematosus.
Wahie S; McColl E; Reynolds NJ; Meggitt SJ
Br J Dermatol; 2010 May; 162(5):1030-7. PubMed ID: 20199547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Health-related quality of life in early breast cancer.
Groenvold M
Dan Med Bull; 2010 Sep; 57(9):B4184. PubMed ID: 20816024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Implicit Review Instrument to Evaluate Quality of Care Delivered by Physicians to Children in Emergency Departments.
Marcin JP; Romano PS; Dharmar M; Chamberlain JM; Dudley N; Macias CG; Nigrovic LE; Powell EC; Rogers AJ; Sonnett M; Tzimenatos L; Alpern ER; Andrews-Dickert R; Borgialli DA; Sidney E; Casper C; Dean JM; Kuppermann N;
Health Serv Res; 2018 Jun; 53(3):1316-1334. PubMed ID: 29143331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inter-rater reliability of case-note audit: a systematic review.
Lilford R; Edwards A; Girling A; Hofer T; Di Tanna GL; Petty J; Nicholl J
J Health Serv Res Policy; 2007 Jul; 12(3):173-80. PubMed ID: 17716421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of two patient classification instruments in an acute care hospital.
Seago JA
J Nurs Adm; 2002 May; 32(5):243-9. PubMed ID: 12021565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Documentation and coding of ED patient encounters: an evaluation of the accuracy of an electronic medical record.
Silfen E
Am J Emerg Med; 2006 Oct; 24(6):664-78. PubMed ID: 16984834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Association between pacifier use and breast-feeding, sudden infant death syndrome, infection and dental malocclusion.
Callaghan A; Kendall G; Lock C; Mahony A; Payne J; Verrier L
Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2005 Jul; 3(6):147-67. PubMed ID: 21631747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measuring hospital adverse events: assessing inter-rater reliability and trigger performance of the Global Trigger Tool.
Naessens JM; O'Byrne TJ; Johnson MG; Vansuch MB; McGlone CM; Huddleston JM
Int J Qual Health Care; 2010 Aug; 22(4):266-74. PubMed ID: 20534607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ranking Hospitals Based on Preventable Hospital Death Rates: A Systematic Review With Implications for Both Direct Measurement and Indirect Measurement Through Standardized Mortality Rates.
Manaseki-Holland S; Lilford RJ; Te AP; Chen YF; Gupta KK; Chilton PJ; Hofer TP
Milbank Q; 2019 Mar; 97(1):228-284. PubMed ID: 30883952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Peer review of the quality of care. Reliability and sources of variability for outcome and process assessments.
Smith MA; Atherly AJ; Kane RL; Pacala JT
JAMA; 1997 Nov; 278(19):1573-8. PubMed ID: 9370502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The determinants of quality in procedural rural medical care.
Hays RB; Veitch C; Evans RJ
Rural Remote Health; 2005; 5(4):473. PubMed ID: 16288583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An empirical assessment of the validity of explicit and implicit process-of-care criteria for quality assessment.
Ashton CM; Kuykendall DH; Johnson ML; Wray NP
Med Care; 1999 Aug; 37(8):798-808. PubMed ID: 10448722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is inter-rater reliability of Global Trigger Tool results altered when members of the review team are replaced?
Mevik K; Griffin FA; Hansen TE; Deilkås E; Vonen B
Int J Qual Health Care; 2016 Sep; 28(4):492-6. PubMed ID: 27283442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Translation and validation of a French version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)].
Favre S; Aubry JM; Gex-Fabry M; Ragama-Pardos E; McQuillan A; Bertschy G
Encephale; 2003; 29(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 15029084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intra- and inter-rater reliability of an electronic health record audit used in a chiropractic teaching clinic system: an observational study.
Injeyan HS; Hogg-Johnson S; Abdulla S; Chow N; Cox J; Ridding A; Jacobs C
BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Jul; 21(1):750. PubMed ID: 34320964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
