These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

45 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2018803)

  • 21. Lesion detection in structured noise.
    Eckstein MP; Whiting JS
    Acad Radiol; 1995 Mar; 2(3):249-53. PubMed ID: 9419557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Validity of the Gaussian assumption in the analysis of ROC data obtained from scintigraphic-like images.
    Guignard PA; Salehi N
    Phys Med Biol; 1983 Dec; 28(12):1409-17. PubMed ID: 6665034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Current methods of digital imaging in conventional X-ray diagnostics.
    Haendle J; Marhoff P
    Eur J Radiol; 1990; 10(3):218-22. PubMed ID: 2192887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [9. Subjective (visual) evaluation].
    Shimosegawa M
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2010 Oct; 66(10):1336-42. PubMed ID: 21060224
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. In vitro perception of low-contrast features in digital, film, and digitized dental radiographs: a receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Grassl U; Schulze RK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 May; 103(5):694-701. PubMed ID: 17466887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Digital chest radiography with a large image intensifier. An ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Månsson LG; Kheddache S; Börjesson J; Mattsson S; Schlossman D
    Eur J Radiol; 1989 Nov; 9(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 2591385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Digital chest radiography with a large image intensifier. Evaluation of diagnostic performance and patient exposure.
    Månsson LG; Kheddache S; Schlossman D; Börjesson J; Håkansson E; Mattsson S; Tylén U
    Acta Radiol; 1989; 30(4):337-42. PubMed ID: 2775592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
    Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Contrast mapping and evaluation for electronic X-ray images on CRT display monitor.
    Suzuki J; Furukawa I; Ono S; Kitamura M; Ando Y
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1997 Dec; 16(6):772-84. PubMed ID: 9533578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [A ROC analysis for comparing contrast perception in grey scale reversal of digital images].
    Dölken W; Krahe T; Landwehr P; Horwitz AE; Lackner K
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1991 Jan; 1(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 2018803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Judgment of the efficacy of digital image diagnosis and ROC analysis].
    Shiraishi J
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2002 Jan; 58(1):14-19. PubMed ID: 12596825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Current perspectives in medical image perception.
    Krupinski EA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Jul; 72(5):1205-17. PubMed ID: 20601701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Human visual perception and ROC methodology in medical imaging.
    Chesters MS
    Phys Med Biol; 1992 Jul; 37(7):1433-76. PubMed ID: 1631192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.