These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
612 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20188236)
1. Shade matching performance of normal and color vision-deficient dental professionals with standard daylight and tungsten illuminants. Gokce HS; Piskin B; Ceyhan D; Gokce SM; Arisan V J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Mar; 103(3):139-47. PubMed ID: 20188236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of illuminants on the color distribution of shade guides. Park JH; Lee YK; Lim BS J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Dec; 96(6):402-11. PubMed ID: 17174657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Changes in the translucency of porcelain and repairing resin composite by the illumination. Lee YK Dent Mater; 2007 Apr; 23(4):492-7. PubMed ID: 16631922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of tab and disk design on shade matching of dental porcelain. Barrett AA; Grimaudo NJ; Anusavice KJ; Yang MC J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):591-7. PubMed ID: 12488851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the shade matching ability of dental students using two light sources. Curd FM; Jasinevicius TR; Graves A; Cox V; Sadan A J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Dec; 96(6):391-6. PubMed ID: 17174655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of the amount of UV component in daylight simulator on the color of dental composite resins. Lu H; Lee YK; Villalta P; Powers JM; Garcia-Godoy F J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Nov; 96(5):322-7. PubMed ID: 17098494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors influencing the shade matching performance of dentists and dental technicians when using two different shade guides. Alomari M; Chadwick RG Br Dent J; 2011 Dec; 211(11):E23. PubMed ID: 22158197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Metameric effect between natural teeth and the shade tabs of a shade guide. Corcodel N; Helling S; Rammelsberg P; Hassel AJ Eur J Oral Sci; 2010 Jun; 118(3):311-6. PubMed ID: 20572867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of a newly developed visual shade-matching apparatus. Paravina RD Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):528-34. PubMed ID: 12475156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Shade matching assisted by digital photography and computer software. Schropp L J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 19141046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Difference in illuminant-dependent color changes of shade guide tabs by the shade designation relative to three illuminants. Cha HS; Lee YK Am J Dent; 2009 Dec; 22(6):350-6. PubMed ID: 20178211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Metameric effect between dental porcelain and porcelain repairing resin composite. Kim SH; Lee YK; Lim BS; Rhee SH; Yang HC Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):374-9. PubMed ID: 16540161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of digital imaging for colour matching and communication in restorative dentistry. Jarad FD; Russell MD; Moss BW Br Dent J; 2005 Jul; 199(1):43-9; discussion 33. PubMed ID: 16003426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of repeated firings on the color of an all-ceramic system with two different veneering porcelain shades. Celik G; Uludag B; Usumez A; Sahin V; Ozturk O; Goktug G J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 18319091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Shade-matching abilities of dental laboratory technicians using a commercial light source. Jasinevicius TR; Curd FM; Schilling L; Sadan A J Prosthodont; 2009 Jan; 18(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 19166550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlations between color differences based on three color-difference formulas using dental shade guide tabs. Kim JG; Yu B; Lee YK J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 19054306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]