112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20188342)
1. The influence of response grouping on free-choice decision making in a response selection task.
Khan MA; Mourton S; Buckolz E; Adam JJ; Hayes AE
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jun; 134(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 20188342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cue validity effects in response preparation: a pupillometric study.
Moresi S; Adam JJ; Rijcken J; Van Gerven PW
Brain Res; 2008 Feb; 1196():94-102. PubMed ID: 18222417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Response preparation with adjacent versus overlapped hands: a pupillometric study.
Moresi S; Adam JJ; Rijcken J; Kuipers H; Severens M; Van Gerven PW
Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Feb; 79(2):280-6. PubMed ID: 21111763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pupil dilation in response preparation.
Moresi S; Adam JJ; Rijcken J; Van Gerven PW; Kuipers H; Jolles J
Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Feb; 67(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 18067982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Beneficial effects of ambiguous precues: parallel motor preparation or reduced premotoric processing time?
Jentzsch I; Leuthold H; Richard Ridderinkhof K
Psychophysiology; 2004 Mar; 41(2):231-44. PubMed ID: 15032988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Spatial coding of touch at the fingers: Insights from double simultaneous stimulation within and between hands.
Tamè L; Farnè A; Pavani F
Neurosci Lett; 2011 Jan; 487(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 20933059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Lateralized readiness potential and reaction time in partial preliminary information of a psychomotor parameter].
Ulrich R; Moore C; Osman A
Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1993; 40(2):310-25. PubMed ID: 8372485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Spared within-hands but impaired between-hands response preparation in aging.
Adam JJ; Jakob R; Bovend'Eerdt TJ; Van Gerven PW
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2012 May; 67(3):317-24. PubMed ID: 21918122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Motor programming of rapid finger sequences: inferences from movement-related brain potentials.
Schröter H; Leuthold H
Psychophysiology; 2009 Mar; 46(2):388-401. PubMed ID: 19207204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Masked response priming in expert typists.
Heinemann A; Kiesel A; Pohl C; Kunde W
Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):399-407. PubMed ID: 19819732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Response preparation with static versus moving hands.
Adam JJ; Moresi S
Brain Cogn; 2007 Dec; 65(3):252-9. PubMed ID: 17540489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bottom-up influences on voluntary task switching: the elusive homunculus escapes.
Yeung N
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):348-62. PubMed ID: 20192535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Top-down attentional control for distractor locations: the benefit of precuing distractor locations on target localization and discrimination.
Chao HF
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Apr; 36(2):303-16. PubMed ID: 20364920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Motor set modulates automatic priming effects of uninformative cues.
Adam JJ; Pratt J
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jun; 128(2):216-24. PubMed ID: 18280449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of intervening tasks on response preparation.
Sangals J; Sommer W
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Apr; 36(2):415-29. PubMed ID: 20364927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Precues enable multiple response preprogramming: evidence from startle.
Carlsen AN; Chua R; Summers JJ; Inglis JT; Sanderson DJ; Franks IM
Psychophysiology; 2009 Mar; 46(2):241-51. PubMed ID: 19207195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Response preparation with static and moving hands: differential effects of unimanual and bimanual movements.
Essers L; Adam JJ
Hum Mov Sci; 2010 Apr; 29(2):187-99. PubMed ID: 20304515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evidence from a response choice task reveals a selection bias in the attentional cueing paradigm.
Wilson DE; Pratt J
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Nov; 126(3):216-25. PubMed ID: 17280639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Response priming in the Go/NoGo task: the N2 reflects neither inhibition nor conflict.
Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Feb; 118(2):343-55. PubMed ID: 17140848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prime retrieval of motor responses in negative priming.
Mayr S; Buchner A; Dentale S
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Apr; 35(2):408-23. PubMed ID: 19331497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
