88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20188486)
1. Revisiting old slides--how worthwhile is it?
Agarwal S; Wadhwa N
Pathol Res Pract; 2010 Jun; 206(6):368-71. PubMed ID: 20188486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Virtual slide telepathology for an academic teaching hospital surgical pathology quality assurance program.
Graham AR; Bhattacharyya AK; Scott KM; Lian F; Grasso LL; Richter LC; Carpenter JB; Chiang S; Henderson JT; Lopez AM; Barker GP; Weinstein RS
Hum Pathol; 2009 Aug; 40(8):1129-36. PubMed ID: 19540562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mandatory second opinion in surgical pathology referral material: clinical consequences of major disagreements.
Manion E; Cohen MB; Weydert J
Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 May; 32(5):732-7. PubMed ID: 18360282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Extraneous tissue in surgical pathology: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 275 laboratories.
Gephardt GN; Zarbo RJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Nov; 120(11):1009-14. PubMed ID: 12049100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measuring errors in surgical pathology in real-life practice: defining what does and does not matter.
Renshaw AA; Gould EW
Am J Clin Pathol; 2007 Jan; 127(1):144-52. PubMed ID: 17145620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of a new method in reaching consensus on the cause of cytologic-histologic correlation discrepancy.
Raab SS; Stone CH; Wojcik EM; Geisinger KR; Dahmoush L; Garcia FU; Grzybicki DM; Janosky JE; Meier FA; Zarbo RJ
Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Dec; 126(6):836-42. PubMed ID: 17074685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Agreement and error rates using blinded review to evaluate surgical pathology of biopsy material.
Renshaw AA; Cartagena N; Granter SR; Gould EW
Am J Clin Pathol; 2003 Jun; 119(6):797-800. PubMed ID: 12817425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effectiveness of random and focused review in detecting surgical pathology error.
Raab SS; Grzybicki DM; Mahood LK; Parwani AV; Kuan SF; Rao UN
Am J Clin Pathol; 2008 Dec; 130(6):905-12. PubMed ID: 19019767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Quality control in pathology: prospective peer review on routine cases].
Greco P; Lanza C; Puzzo L; Tranchina MG; Gangemi P; Cutrona D
Pathologica; 2000 Feb; 92(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 10842996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Amended reports in surgical pathology and implications for diagnostic error detection and avoidance: a College of American Pathologists Q-probes study of 1,667,547 accessioned cases in 359 laboratories.
Nakhleh RE; Zarbo RJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Apr; 122(4):303-9. PubMed ID: 9648896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mammographically directed breast biopsies: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of clinical physician expectations and of specimen handling and reporting characteristics in 434 institutions.
Nakhleh RE; Jones B; Zarbo RJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Jan; 121(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 9111087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Virtual slide telepathology enables an innovative telehealth rapid breast care clinic.
López AM; Graham AR; Barker GP; Richter LC; Krupinski EA; Lian F; Grasso LL; Miller A; Kreykes LN; Henderson JT; Bhattacharyya AK; Weinstein RS
Hum Pathol; 2009 Aug; 40(8):1082-91. PubMed ID: 19552938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surgical pathology sign-out. Routine review of every case by a second pathologist.
Safrin RE; Bark CJ
Am J Surg Pathol; 1993 Nov; 17(11):1190-2. PubMed ID: 8214266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection and classification of diagnostic discrepancies (errors) in surgical pathology.
Roy JE; Hunt JL
Adv Anat Pathol; 2010 Sep; 17(5):359-65. PubMed ID: 20733354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of whole slide imaging for primary diagnosis in surgical pathology.
Bauer TW; Schoenfield L; Slaw RJ; Yerian L; Sun Z; Henricks WH
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Apr; 137(4):518-24. PubMed ID: 23323732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical impact and frequency of anatomic pathology errors in cancer diagnoses.
Raab SS; Grzybicki DM; Janosky JE; Zarbo RJ; Meier FA; Jensen C; Geyer SJ
Cancer; 2005 Nov; 104(10):2205-13. PubMed ID: 16216029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interinstitutional comparison of frozen section consultation in small hospitals: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 18,532 frozen section consultation diagnoses in 233 small hospitals.
Novis DA; Gephardt GN; Zarbo RJ;
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Dec; 120(12):1087-93. PubMed ID: 15456172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The development and testing of a laboratory information system-driven tool for pre-sign-out quality assurance of random surgical pathology reports.
Owens SR; Dhir R; Yousem SA; Kelly SM; Piccoli A; Wiehagen L; Lassige K; Parwani AV
Am J Clin Pathol; 2010 Jun; 133(6):836-41. PubMed ID: 20472840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patterns of second-opinion diagnosis in oral and maxillofacial pathology.
Jones K; Jordan RC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jun; 109(6):865-9. PubMed ID: 20304686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intralaboratory timeliness of surgical pathology reports. Results of two College of American Pathologists Q-Probes studies of biopsies and complex specimens.
Zarbo RJ; Gephardt GN; Howanitz PJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Mar; 120(3):234-44. PubMed ID: 8629897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
