281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20188625)
21. Transcranial electrical stimulation over visual cortex evokes phosphenes with a retinal origin.
Kar K; Krekelberg B
J Neurophysiol; 2012 Oct; 108(8):2173-8. PubMed ID: 22855777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Modulatory effects of low- and high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on visual cortex of healthy subjects undergoing light deprivation.
Fierro B; Brighina F; Vitello G; Piazza A; Scalia S; Giglia G; Daniele O; Pascual-Leone A
J Physiol; 2005 Jun; 565(Pt 2):659-65. PubMed ID: 15760946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Phosphene thresholds evoked with single and double TMS pulses.
Kammer T; Baumann LW
Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Mar; 121(3):376-9. PubMed ID: 20079689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. No correlation between moving phosphene and motor thresholds: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.
Antal A; Nitsche MA; Kincses TZ; Lampe C; Paulus W
Neuroreport; 2004 Feb; 15(2):297-302. PubMed ID: 15076756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the visual system. II. Characterization of induced phosphenes and scotomas.
Kammer T; Puls K; Erb M; Grodd W
Exp Brain Res; 2005 Jan; 160(1):129-40. PubMed ID: 15368087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Retinal and Cortical Contributions to Phosphenes During Transcranial Electrical Current Stimulation.
Evans ID; Palmisano S; Croft RJ
Bioelectromagnetics; 2021 Feb; 42(2):146-158. PubMed ID: 33440463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals high test-retest reliability for phosphenes but not for suppression of visual perception.
Siniatchkin M; Schlicke C; Stephani U
Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Dec; 122(12):2475-81. PubMed ID: 21641863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Bidirectional modulation of primary visual cortex excitability: a combined tDCS and rTMS study.
Lang N; Siebner HR; Chadaide Z; Boros K; Nitsche MA; Rothwell JC; Paulus W; Antal A
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Dec; 48(12):5782-7. PubMed ID: 18055832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Development of an extraocular retinal prosthesis: evaluation of stimulation parameters in the cat.
Chowdhury V; Morley JW; Coroneo MT
J Clin Neurosci; 2008 Aug; 15(8):900-6. PubMed ID: 18586497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Examination of the visual system with transcranial magnetic stimulation].
Meyer BU; Diehl RR
Nervenarzt; 1992 Jun; 63(6):328-34. PubMed ID: 1635614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Magnetic stimulation of visual cortex: factors influencing the perception of phosphenes.
Ray PG; Meador KJ; Epstein CM; Loring DW; Day LJ
J Clin Neurophysiol; 1998 Jul; 15(4):351-7. PubMed ID: 9736469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. High-frequency oscillations in human visual cortex do not mirror retinal frequencies.
Heinrich SP; Bach M
Neurosci Lett; 2004 Oct; 369(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 15380307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Amplitude modulated transcranial alternating current stimulation (AM-TACS) efficacy evaluation via phosphene induction.
Thiele C; Zaehle T; Haghikia A; Ruhnau P
Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):22245. PubMed ID: 34782626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Time-dependent changes in cortical excitability after prolonged visual deprivation.
Pitskel NB; Merabet LB; Ramos-Estebanez C; Kauffman T; Pascual-Leone A
Neuroreport; 2007 Oct; 18(16):1703-7. PubMed ID: 17921872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Psychological aspects of perception of magnetophosphenes and electrophosphenes].
Reissenweber J; David E; Pfotenhauer M
Biomed Tech (Berl); 1992 Mar; 37(3):42-5. PubMed ID: 1581477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Precise oculocentric mapping of transcranial magnetic stimulation-evoked phosphenes.
Silva AE; Tsang K; Hasan SJ; Thompson B
Neuroreport; 2021 Aug; 32(11):913-917. PubMed ID: 34102648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The influence of current direction on phosphene thresholds evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Kammer T; Beck S; Erb M; Grodd W
Clin Neurophysiol; 2001 Nov; 112(11):2015-21. PubMed ID: 11682339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effects of theta burst stimulation protocols on phosphene threshold.
Franca M; Koch G; Mochizuki H; Huang YZ; Rothwell JC
Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Aug; 117(8):1808-13. PubMed ID: 16797230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. In vivo electrical stimulation of rabbit retina with a microfabricated array: strategies to maximize responses for prospective assessment of stimulus efficacy and biocompatibility.
Rizzo JF; Goldbaum S; Shahin M; Denison TJ; Wyatt J
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2004; 22(6):429-43. PubMed ID: 15798362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A cortical (V1) neurophysiological recording model for assessing the efficacy of retinal visual prostheses.
Elfar SD; Cottaris NP; Iezzi R; Abrams GW
J Neurosci Methods; 2009 Jun; 180(2):195-207. PubMed ID: 19464512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
