These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20188635)

  • 1. Deliberative assessment of surrogate consent in dementia research.
    Kim SY; Uhlmann RA; Appelbaum PS; Knopman DS; Kim HM; Damschroder L; Beattie E; Struble L; De Vries R
    Alzheimers Dement; 2010 Jul; 6(4):342-50. PubMed ID: 20188635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of public deliberation on attitudes toward surrogate consent for dementia research.
    Kim SY; Kim HM; Knopman DS; De Vries R; Damschroder L; Appelbaum PS
    Neurology; 2011 Dec; 77(24):2097-104. PubMed ID: 21975207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the quality of democratic deliberation: a case study of public deliberation on the ethics of surrogate consent for research.
    De Vries R; Stanczyk A; Wall IF; Uhlmann R; Damschroder LJ; Kim SY
    Soc Sci Med; 2010 Jun; 70(12):1896-1903. PubMed ID: 20378225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How important is 'accuracy' of surrogate decision-making for research participation?
    Kim SY; Kim HM; Ryan KA; Appelbaum PS; Knopman DS; Damschroder L; De Vries R
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e54790. PubMed ID: 23382969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Public's approach to surrogate consent for dementia research: cautious pragmatism.
    De Vries R; Ryan KA; Stanczyk A; Appelbaum PS; Damschroder L; Knopman DS; Kim SY
    Am J Geriatr Psychiatry; 2013 Apr; 21(4):364-72. PubMed ID: 23498383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the public's views in research ethics controversies: deliberative democracy and bioethics as natural allies.
    Kim SY; Wall IF; Stanczyk A; De Vries R
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2009 Dec; 4(4):3-16. PubMed ID: 19919315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What do people at risk for Alzheimer disease think about surrogate consent for research?
    Kim SY; Kim HM; McCallum C; Tariot PN
    Neurology; 2005 Nov; 65(9):1395-401. PubMed ID: 16275826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surrogate consent for dementia research: a national survey of older Americans.
    Kim SY; Kim HM; Langa KM; Karlawish JH; Knopman DS; Appelbaum PS
    Neurology; 2009 Jan; 72(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 19139366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A framework for assessing the quality of democratic deliberation: enhancing deliberation as a tool for bioethics.
    De Vries R; Stanczyk AE; Ryan KA; Kim SY
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2011 Sep; 6(3):3-17. PubMed ID: 21931233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of deliberation on the public's attitudes toward consent policies for biobank research.
    Tomlinson T; De Vries RG; Kim HM; Gordon L; Ryan KA; Krenz CD; Jewell S; Kim SYH
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2018 Feb; 26(2):176-185. PubMed ID: 29348694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Different opinions when it comes to research ethics issues concerning patients with dementia. A questionnaire study among members of research ethics committees].
    Peterson G; Wallin A
    Lakartidningen; 2004 May; 101(20):1810-2. PubMed ID: 15190768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attitudes of relatives of patients in intensive care and emergency departments to surrogate consent to research on incapacitated participants.
    Stephenson AC; Baker S; Zeps N
    Crit Care Resusc; 2007 Mar; 9(1):40-50. PubMed ID: 17352666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comfort with proxy consent to research involving decisionally impaired older adults: do type of proxy and risk-benefit profile matter?
    Dubois MF; Bravo G; Graham J; Wildeman S; Cohen C; Painter K; Bellemare S
    Int Psychogeriatr; 2011 Nov; 23(9):1479-88. PubMed ID: 21429277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surrogate consent for research involving adults with impaired decision making: survey of Institutional Review Board practices.
    Gong MN; Winkel G; Rhodes R; Richardson LD; Silverstein JH
    Crit Care Med; 2010 Nov; 38(11):2146-54. PubMed ID: 20802325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Barriers to obtaining consent in dementia research: implications for surrogate decision-making.
    Baskin SA; Morris J; Ahronheim JC; Meier DE; Morrison RS
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 1998 Mar; 46(3):287-90. PubMed ID: 9514373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Public Deliberation as a Novel Method for an Exception From Informed Consent Community Consultation.
    Powers PE; Shore KK; Perez S; Ritley D; Kuppermann N; Holmes JF; Tzimenatos LS; Shawargga H; Nishijima DK
    Acad Emerg Med; 2019 Oct; 26(10):1158-1168. PubMed ID: 31271691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Older adults' attitudes toward enrollment of non-competent subjects participating in Alzheimer's research.
    Karlawish J; Rubright J; Casarett D; Cary M; Ten Have T; Sankar P
    Am J Psychiatry; 2009 Feb; 166(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 18923066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. When Patient Engagement and Research Ethics Collide: Lessons from a Dementia Forum.
    Robillard JM; Feng TL
    J Alzheimers Dis; 2017; 59(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 28550251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A survey of researchers using a consent policy for cognitively impaired human research subjects.
    Candilis PJ; Wesley RW; Wichman A
    IRB; 1993; 15(6):1-4. PubMed ID: 11654095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Alternative decision-makers' perspectives on assent and dissent for dementia research.
    Overton E; Appelbaum PS; Fisher SR; Dohan D; Roberts LW; Dunn LB
    Am J Geriatr Psychiatry; 2013 Apr; 21(4):346-54. PubMed ID: 23498381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.