These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20188635)
21. Effect of Public Deliberation on Attitudes toward Return of Secondary Results in Genomic Sequencing. Gornick MC; Scherer AM; Sutton EJ; Ryan KA; Exe NL; Li M; Uhlmann WR; Kim SY; Roberts JS; De Vries RG J Genet Couns; 2017 Feb; 26(1):122-132. PubMed ID: 27307100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The attitudes of Chinese family caregivers of older people with dementia towards life sustaining treatments. Kwok T; Twinn S; Yan E J Adv Nurs; 2007 May; 58(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 17474914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Preservation of the capacity to appoint a proxy decision maker: implications for dementia research. Kim SY; Karlawish JH; Kim HM; Wall IF; Bozoki AC; Appelbaum PS Arch Gen Psychiatry; 2011 Feb; 68(2):214-20. PubMed ID: 21300949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effectiveness of public deliberation methods for gathering input on issues in healthcare: Results from a randomized trial. Carman KL; Mallery C; Maurer M; Wang G; Garfinkel S; Yang M; Gilmore D; Windham A; Ginsburg M; Sofaer S; Gold M; Pathak-Sen E; Davies T; Siegel J; Mangrum R; Fernandez J; Richmond J; Fishkin J; Siu Chao A Soc Sci Med; 2015 May; 133():11-20. PubMed ID: 25828260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Computer-Based Driving in Dementia Decision Tool With Mail Support: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. Rapoport MJ; Zucchero Sarracini C; Kiss A; Lee L; Byszewski A; Seitz DP; Vrkljan B; Molnar F; Herrmann N; Tang-Wai DF; Frank C; Henry B; Pimlott N; Masellis M; Naglie G J Med Internet Res; 2018 May; 20(5):e194. PubMed ID: 29802093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Are individuals living with mental illness and their preferred alternative decision-makers attuned and aligned in their attitudes regarding treatment decisions? Roberts LW; Kim JP J Psychiatr Res; 2016 Jul; 78():42-7. PubMed ID: 27058644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Do surrogate decision makers provide accurate consent for intensive care research? Coppolino M; Ackerson L Chest; 2001 Feb; 119(2):603-12. PubMed ID: 11171743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Dementia and dignity: towards a new method of surrogate decision making. Koppelman ER J Med Philos; 2002 Feb; 27(1):65-85. PubMed ID: 11961687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Deciding on behalf of others: a population survey on procedural preferences for surrogate decision-making. Frey R; Herzog SM; Hertwig R BMJ Open; 2018 Jul; 8(7):e022289. PubMed ID: 30049700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Ethical and legal aspects of research involving older people with cognitive impairment: A survey of dementia researchers in Australia. Ries NM; Mansfield E; Sanson-Fisher R Int J Law Psychiatry; 2020; 68():101534. PubMed ID: 32033698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Eliciting patient views on the allocation of limited healthcare resources: a deliberation on hepatitis C treatment in the Veterans Health Administration. Waljee AK; Ryan KA; Krenz CD; Ioannou GN; Beste LA; Tincopa MA; Saini SD; Su GL; Arasim ME; Roman PT; Nallamothu BK; De Vries R BMC Health Serv Res; 2020 May; 20(1):369. PubMed ID: 32357873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Research on humans suffering from dementia]. Helmchen H Nervenarzt; 2015 Sep; 86(9):1140-7. PubMed ID: 25968651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Morally Relevant Similarities and Differences Between Children and Dementia Patients as Research Subjects: Representation in Legal Documents and Ethical Guidelines. Jongsma K; Bos W; van de Vathorst S Bioethics; 2015 Nov; 29(9):662-70. PubMed ID: 26481208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Providing support to surrogate decision-makers for people living with dementia: Healthcare professional, organisational and community responsibilities. Shanley C; Fetherstonhaugh D; McAuliffe L; Bauer M; Beattie E Health Soc Care Community; 2017 Sep; 25(5):1563-1570. PubMed ID: 28569431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Obtaining surrogate consent for a minimal-risk research study in the intensive care unit setting. Larkin ME; Beauharnais CC; Magyar K; Macey L; Grennan KB; Boykin EE; Russell SJ Clin Trials; 2013 Feb; 10(1):93-6. PubMed ID: 23169873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Mobile Health, Information Preferences, and Surrogate Decision-Making Preferences of Family Caregivers of People With Dementia in Rural Hispanic Communities: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study. Xie B; Champion JD; Kwak J; Fleischmann KR J Med Internet Res; 2018 Dec; 20(12):e11682. PubMed ID: 30530450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Surrogate decision making for patients with end-stage dementia. Jox RJ; Denke E; Hamann J; Mendel R; Förstl H; Borasio GD Int J Geriatr Psychiatry; 2012 Oct; 27(10):1045-52. PubMed ID: 22139621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Impact of a decision aid on surrogate decision-makers' perceptions of feeding options for patients with dementia. Snyder EA; Caprio AJ; Wessell K; Lin FC; Hanson LC J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2013 Feb; 14(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 23273855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Proxy and surrogate consent in geriatric neuropsychiatric research: update and recommendations. Kim SY; Appelbaum PS; Jeste DV; Olin JT Am J Psychiatry; 2004 May; 161(5):797-806. PubMed ID: 15121642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A changing landscape for advance directives in dementia research. Pierce R Soc Sci Med; 2010 Feb; 70(4):623-30. PubMed ID: 19932546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]