These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20188800)

  • 61. The effect of response rate on reward value in a self-control task.
    Fortes I; Vasconcelos M; Machado A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Jan; 103(1):141-52. PubMed ID: 25533528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Effects of altering reinforcer magnitude and reinforcement schedule on phencyclidine (PCP) self-administration in monkeys using an adjusting delay task.
    Newman JL; Perry JL; Carroll ME
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2008 Oct; 90(4):778-86. PubMed ID: 18582491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Extended access to amphetamine self-administration increases impulsive choice in a delay discounting task in rats.
    Gipson CD; Bardo MT
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2009 Dec; 207(3):391-400. PubMed ID: 19784636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Concurrent progressive-ratio schedules: built-in controls in the study of delayed reward efficacy.
    Jarmolowicz DP; Hudnall JL
    J Neurosci Methods; 2014 Aug; 233():172-6. PubMed ID: 24979725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Effects of intertrial reinforcers on self-control choice.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 Jan; 61(1):83-96. PubMed ID: 8126393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Nucleus accumbens lesions decrease sensitivity to rapid changes in the delay to reinforcement.
    Acheson A; Farrar AM; Patak M; Hausknecht KA; Kieres AK; Choi S; de Wit H; Richards JB
    Behav Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 173(2):217-28. PubMed ID: 16884790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Dissociation between long-lasting behavioral sensitization to amphetamine and impulsive choice in rats performing a delay-discounting task.
    Stanis JJ; Marquez Avila H; White MD; Gulley JM
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2008 Sep; 199(4):539-48. PubMed ID: 18473112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. High-sucrose diets in male rats disrupt aspects of decision making tasks, motivation and spatial memory, but not impulsivity measured by operant delay-discounting.
    Wong A; Dogra VR; Reichelt AC
    Behav Brain Res; 2017 Jun; 327():144-154. PubMed ID: 28365197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Childhood ADHD and Delayed Reinforcement: A Direct Comparison of Performance on Hypothetical and Real-Time Delay Tasks.
    Yu X; Sonuga-Barke E
    J Atten Disord; 2020 Mar; 24(5):810-818. PubMed ID: 27469395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Reward Maximization Assessed Using a Sequential Patch Depletion Task in a Large Sample of Heterogeneous Stock Rats.
    Gancarz AM; Mitchell SH; George AM; Martin CD; Turk MC; Bool HM; Aktar F; Kwarteng F; Palmer AA; Meyer PJ; Richards JB; Dietz DM; Isiwari K
    Res Sq; 2023 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 36778344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Future altruism: Social discounting of delayed rewards.
    Yi R; Charlton S; Porter C; Carter AE; Bickel WK
    Behav Processes; 2011 Jan; 86(1):160-3. PubMed ID: 20950676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Contributions of the orbitofrontal cortex to impulsive choice: interactions with basal levels of impulsivity, dopamine signalling, and reward-related cues.
    Zeeb FD; Floresco SB; Winstanley CA
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2010 Jul; 211(1):87-98. PubMed ID: 20428999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Genome-wide association study of delay discounting in Heterogenous Stock rats.
    Lara MK; Chitre AS; Chen D; Johnson BB; Nguyen KM; Cohen KA; Muckadam SA; Lin B; Ziegler S; Beeson A; Sanches T; Solberg Woods LC; Polesskaya O; Palmer AA; Mitchell SH
    bioRxiv; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38168347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Delay discounting of real and hypothetical rewards.
    Madden GJ; Begotka AM; Raiff BR; Kastern LL
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2003 May; 11(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 12755458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Evaluating the effect of delay spacing on delay discounting: carry-over effects on steepness and the form of the discounting function.
    Rung JM; Frye CCJ; DeHart WB; Odum AL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2019 Nov; 112(3):254-272. PubMed ID: 31694068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Delay discounting: Pigeon, rat, human--does it matter?
    Vanderveldt A; Oliveira L; Green L
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2016 Apr; 42(2):141-62. PubMed ID: 26881899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Parameters of delay discounting assessment: number of trials, effort, and sequential effects.
    Robles E; Vargas PA
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jun; 78(2):285-90. PubMed ID: 18222614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Procrastination by pigeons with fixed-interval response requirements.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Mar; 69(2):185-97. PubMed ID: 9540230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Discounting of delayed rewards is not hyperbolic.
    Luhmann CC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1274-9. PubMed ID: 23356243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Bidding for delayed rewards: Accumulation as delay discounting, delay discounting as regulation, demand functions as corollary.
    Killeen PR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2019 Sep; 112(2):111-127. PubMed ID: 31589338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.