108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20189214)
1. A comparison of bacterial populations in enhanced biological phosphorus removal processes using membrane filtration or gravity sedimentation for solids-liquid separation.
Hall ER; Monti A; Mohn WW
Water Res; 2010 May; 44(9):2703-14. PubMed ID: 20189214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative study of biological nutrient removal (BNR) processes with sedimentation and membrane-based separation.
Monti A; Hall ER; Dawson RN; Husain H; Kelly HG
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2006 Jul; 94(4):740-52. PubMed ID: 16477659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
Bal AS; Dhagat NN
Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative study of fouling-related properties of sludge from conventional and membrane enhanced biological phosphorus removal processes.
Geng Z; Hall ER
Water Res; 2007 Nov; 41(19):4329-38. PubMed ID: 17697695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Monitoring associations between clade-level variation, overall community structure and ecosystem function in enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) systems using terminal-restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP).
Slater FR; Johnson CR; Blackall LL; Beiko RG; Bond PL
Water Res; 2010 Sep; 44(17):4908-23. PubMed ID: 20701946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of nitrification rates in conventional and membrane-assisted biological nutrient removal processes.
Monti A; Hall ER
Water Environ Res; 2008 Jun; 80(6):497-506. PubMed ID: 18686925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The potential role of 'Candidatus Microthrix parvicella' in phosphorus removal during sludge bulking in two full-scale enhanced biological phosphorus removal plants.
Wang J; Qi R; Liu M; Li Q; Bao H; Li Y; Wang S; Tandoi V; Yang M
Water Sci Technol; 2014; 70(2):367-75. PubMed ID: 25051486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Metagenomic analysis of two enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) sludge communities.
García Martín H; Ivanova N; Kunin V; Warnecke F; Barry KW; McHardy AC; Yeates C; He S; Salamov AA; Szeto E; Dalin E; Putnam NH; Shapiro HJ; Pangilinan JL; Rigoutsos I; Kyrpides NC; Blackall LL; McMahon KD; Hugenholtz P
Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Oct; 24(10):1263-9. PubMed ID: 16998472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Molecular characterization of the microbial community structure in two activated sludge systems for the advanced treatment of domestic effluents.
Eschenhagen M; Schuppler M; Röske I
Water Res; 2003 Jul; 37(13):3224-32. PubMed ID: 14509710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Monitoring the impact of bioaugmentation on the start up of biological phosphorus removal in a laboratory scale activated sludge ecosystem.
Dabert P; Delgenès JP; Godon JJ
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2005 Feb; 66(5):575-88. PubMed ID: 15322774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Which are the polyphosphate accumulating organisms in full-scale activated sludge enhanced biological phosphate removal systems in Australia?
Beer M; Stratton HM; Griffiths PC; Seviour RJ
J Appl Microbiol; 2006 Feb; 100(2):233-43. PubMed ID: 16430499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Investigation of bacterial diversity in membrane bioreactor and conventional activated sludge processes from petroleum refineries using phylogenetic and statistical approaches.
Silva CC; Jesus EC; Torres AP; Sousa MP; Santiago VM; Oliveira VM
J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2010 Mar; 20(3):447-59. PubMed ID: 20372011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of reactor configuration and operational mode on Microthrix parvicella bulking and foaming in nutrient removal activated sludge systems.
Noutsopoulos C; Mamais D; Andreadakis AD
Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(1-2):61-4. PubMed ID: 12216689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors affecting the microbial populations at full-scale enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) wastewater treatment plants in The Netherlands.
López-Vázquez CM; Hooijmans CM; Brdjanovic D; Gijzen HJ; van Loosdrecht MC
Water Res; 2008 May; 42(10-11):2349-60. PubMed ID: 18272198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Polyphosphate kinase genes from full-scale activated sludge plants.
McMahon KD; Yilmaz S; He S; Gall DL; Jenkins D; Keasling JD
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2007 Nov; 77(1):167-73. PubMed ID: 17671784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Enhanced biological phosphorus removal process implemented in membrane bioreactors to improve phosphorous recovery and recycling.
Lesjean B; Gnirss R; Adam C; Kraume M; Luck F
Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 12926624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The characteristics of the bacterial community structure and population dynamics for phosphorus removal in SBR activated sludge processes.
Lin CK; Katayama Y; Hosomi M; Murakami A; Okada M
Water Res; 2003 Jul; 37(12):2944-52. PubMed ID: 12767297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Microbial community structure and dynamics in a pilot-scale submerged membrane bioreactor aerobically treating domestic wastewater under real operation conditions.
Molina-Muñoz M; Poyatos JM; Sánchez-Peinado M; Hontoria E; González-López J; Rodelas B
Sci Total Environ; 2009 Jun; 407(13):3994-4003. PubMed ID: 19394070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Phylogeny and in situ identification of a novel gammaproteobacterium in activated sludge.
Schroeder S; Petrovski S; Campbell B; McIlroy S; Seviour R
FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2009 Aug; 297(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 19548893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance of IFAS wastewater treatment processes for biological phosphorus removal.
Sriwiriyarat T; Randall CW
Water Res; 2005 Oct; 39(16):3873-84. PubMed ID: 16126245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
