271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20189323)
21. Effect of suture locking and suture caliber on fatigue strength of flexor tendon repairs.
Barrie KA; Tomak SL; Cholewicki J; Merrell GA; Wolfe SW
J Hand Surg Am; 2001 Mar; 26(2):340-6. PubMed ID: 11279582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effects of a Q Suture Technique on Resistance to Gap Formation and Tensile Strength of Repaired Tendons: An Ex Vivo Mechanical Study.
Mao WF; Wu YF
J Hand Surg Am; 2020 Mar; 45(3):258.e1-258.e7. PubMed ID: 31451319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Two-, four-, and six-strand zone II flexor tendon repairs: an in situ biomechanical comparison using a cadaver model.
Thurman RT; Trumble TE; Hanel DP; Tencer AF; Kiser PK
J Hand Surg Am; 1998 Mar; 23(2):261-5. PubMed ID: 9556266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Adhesion formation after flexor tendon repair: comparison of two- and four-strand repair without epitendinous suture.
Strick MJ; Filan SL; Hile M; McKenzie C; Walsh WR; Tonkin MA
Hand Surg; 2005; 10(2-3):193-7. PubMed ID: 16568513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Mechanical strengths of tendon sutures. An in vitro comparative study of six techniques.
Zatiti SC; Mazzer N; Barbieri CH
J Hand Surg Br; 1998 Apr; 23(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 9607666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Adhesion formation after flexor tendon repair: a histologic and biomechanical comparison of 2- and 4-strand repairs in a chicken model.
Strick MJ; Filan SL; Hile M; McKenzie C; Walsh WR; Tonkin MA
J Hand Surg Am; 2004 Jan; 29(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 14751097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Gliding resistance after repair of partially lacerated human flexor digitorum profundus tendon in vitro.
Zhao C; Amadio PC; Zobitz ME; Momose T; Couvreur P; An KN
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2001 Oct; 16(8):696-701. PubMed ID: 11535351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A Mechanical Evaluation of Zone II Flexor Tendon Repair Using a Knotless Barbed Suture Versus a Traditional Braided Suture.
Nayak AN; Nguyen DV; Brabender RC; Hiro ME; Miles JJ; Smithson IR; Santoni BG; Stone JD; Hess AV
J Hand Surg Am; 2015 Jul; 40(7):1355-62. PubMed ID: 26050207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A Biomechanical Comparison of Gliding Resistance between Modified Lim Tsai and Asymmetric Tendon Repair Techniques in Zone II Flexor Tendon Repairs.
Huan KWSJ; Lim RQR; Wong YR
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol; 2022 Jun; 27(3):499-505. PubMed ID: 35674265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Transosseous Sutures in Tendon-to-Bone Repairs: the Role of the Epitendinous Suture.
Christen SM; Gruenert JG; Harenberg PS
J Invest Surg; 2022 Mar; 35(3):584-590. PubMed ID: 33784920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Biomechanical study of cross-locked cruciate versus Strickland flexor tendon repair.
Vigler M; Palti R; Goldstein R; Patel VP; Nasser P; Lee SK
J Hand Surg Am; 2008 Dec; 33(10):1826-33. PubMed ID: 19084186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Flexor tendon repair with a knotless barbed suture: a comparative biomechanical study.
Marrero-Amadeo IC; Chauhan A; Warden SJ; Merrell GA
J Hand Surg Am; 2011 Jul; 36(7):1204-8. PubMed ID: 21664072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of core suture technique and type on the gliding resistance during cyclic motion following flexor tendon repair: a cadaveric study.
Moriya T; Zhao C; Yamashita T; An KN; Amadio PC
J Orthop Res; 2010 Nov; 28(11):1475-81. PubMed ID: 20872584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of gap size on gliding resistance after flexor tendon repair.
Zhao C; Amadio PC; Tanaka T; Kutsumi K; Tsubone T; Zobitz ME; An KN
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Nov; 86(11):2482-8. PubMed ID: 15523022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The suture loop holding capacity of flexor digitorum profundus tendon within and outside the digital tendon sheath.
Havulinna J; Leppänen OV; Göransson H
J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2013 Sep; 38(7):801-4. PubMed ID: 23315625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of bite depth of an epitendinous suture on the biomechanical strength of repaired canine flexor tendons.
Duffy DJ; Chang YJ; Gaffney LS; Fisher MB; Moore GE
Am J Vet Res; 2019 Nov; 80(11):1043-1049. PubMed ID: 31644344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Treatment of partial lacerations in flexor tendons by trimming. A biomechanical in vitro study.
Erhard L; Zobitz ME; Zhao C; Amadio PC; An KN
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Jun; 84(6):1006-12. PubMed ID: 12063336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Optimizing biomechanical performance of the 4-strand cruciate flexor tendon repair.
Dona E; Gianoutsos MP; Walsh WR
J Hand Surg Am; 2004 Jul; 29(4):571-80. PubMed ID: 15249078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Repair of zone II flexor digitorum profundus lacerations using varying suture sizes: a comparative biomechanical study.
Alavanja G; Dailey E; Mass DP
J Hand Surg Am; 2005 May; 30(3):448-54. PubMed ID: 15925150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Biomechanical Analysis of Zone 2 Flexor Tendon Repair With a Coupler Device Versus Locking Cruciate Core Suture.
Irwin CS; Parks BG; Means KR
J Hand Surg Am; 2020 Sep; 45(9):878.e1-878.e6. PubMed ID: 32276814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
