These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20189637)

  • 1. A method of improving marginal adaptation by elimination of singular stress point in composite restorations during resin photo-polymerization.
    Petrovic LM; Drobac MR; Stojanac ILj; Atanackovic TM
    Dent Mater; 2010 May; 26(5):449-55. PubMed ID: 20189637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of low-elastic modulus liner and base as stress-absorbing layer in composite resin restorations.
    Oliveira LC; Duarte S; Araujo CA; Abrahão A
    Dent Mater; 2010 Mar; 26(3):e159-69. PubMed ID: 20031198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Marginal adaption of Class V restorations with and without "softstart-polymerization".
    Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Märkl A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 11203787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Directed polymerization shrinkage versus a horizontal incremental filling technique: interfacial adaptation in vivo in Class II cavities.
    van Dijken JW; Hörstedt P; Waern R
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):165-72. PubMed ID: 10388370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Resin pins: a novel composite resin concept for treatment of posterior teeth--technical presentation.
    de Almeida BC; de Almeida RS
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 20(8):507-11; quiz 512. PubMed ID: 18990903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations--Part II.
    Hardan LS; Amm EW; Ghayad A; Ghosn C; Khraisat A
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2009 Jun; 32(126):29-37. PubMed ID: 20069964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Polymerization shrinkage: effects of constraint and filling technique in composite restorations.
    Loguercio AD; Reis A; Ballester RY
    Dent Mater; 2004 Mar; 20(3):236-43. PubMed ID: 15209228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A biomechanical model for a new incremental technique for tooth restoration.
    Sarcev IN; Petronijevic BS; Atanackovic TM
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2012; 14(3):85-91. PubMed ID: 23140178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does a low-shrinking composite induce less stress at the adhesive interface?
    Van Ende A; De Munck J; Mine A; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B
    Dent Mater; 2010 Mar; 26(3):215-22. PubMed ID: 19906417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of the shape of the layers in photo-cured dental restorations on the shrinkage stress peaks-FEM study.
    Kowalczyk P
    Dent Mater; 2009 Dec; 25(12):e83-91. PubMed ID: 19786300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors influencing marginal cavity adaptation of nanofiller containing resin composite restorations.
    Takahashi H; Finger WJ; Wegner K; Utterodt A; Komatsu M; Wöstmann B; Balkenhol M
    Dent Mater; 2010 Dec; 26(12):1166-75. PubMed ID: 20884047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Polymerization contraction stresses of resin-based composite restorations within beveled cavity preparations of Class I restorations.
    Kinomoto Y; Torii M; Takeshige F; Ebisu S
    Am J Dent; 2003 Apr; 16(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 12797575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Managing the polymerization shrinkage of resin composite restorations: a review.
    Alomari Q; Ajlouni R; Omar R
    SADJ; 2007 Feb; 62(1):12, 14, 16 passim. PubMed ID: 17427725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Polymerization shrinkage: effects of boundary conditions and filling technique of resin composite restorations.
    Loguercio AD; Reis A; Schroeder M; Balducci I; Versluis A; Ballester RY
    J Dent; 2004 Aug; 32(6):459-70. PubMed ID: 15240064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Residual shrinkage stress distributions in molars after composite restoration.
    Versluis A; Tantbirojn D; Pintado MR; DeLong R; Douglas WH
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jul; 20(6):554-64. PubMed ID: 15134943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Calculation of contraction stresses in dental composites by analysis of crack propagation in the matrix surrounding a cavity.
    Yamamoto T; Ferracane JL; Sakaguchi RL; Swain MV
    Dent Mater; 2009 Apr; 25(4):543-50. PubMed ID: 19100613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A review of polymerization shrinkage stress: current techniques for posterior direct resin restorations.
    Giachetti L; Scaminaci Russo D; Bambi C; Grandini R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Sep; 7(4):79-88. PubMed ID: 16957794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations.
    Hardan LS; Amm EW; Ghayad A
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2008 Dec; 31(124):27-34. PubMed ID: 19441264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.