354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20189672)
1. The incorporation of family physicians in the assessment of diabetic retinopathy by non-mydriatic fundus camera.
Romero P; Sagarra R; Ferrer J; Fernández-Ballart J; Baget M
Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2010 May; 88(2):184-8. PubMed ID: 20189672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interobserver agreement in the interpretation of single-field digital fundus images for diabetic retinopathy screening.
Ruamviboonsuk P; Teerasuwanajak K; Tiensuwan M; Yuttitham K;
Ophthalmology; 2006 May; 113(5):826-32. PubMed ID: 16650679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of a digital retinal imaging system and seven-field stereo color fundus photography to detect diabetic retinopathy in the primary care environment.
Schiffman RM; Jacobsen G; Nussbaum JJ; Desai UR; Carey JD; Glasser D; Zimmer-Galler IE; Zeimer R; Goldberg MF
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2005; 36(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 15688971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of quantitative mapping and stereoscopic fundus photography grading of retinal thickness in diabetic eyes with macular edema.
Yang Y; Vitale S; Ding Y; O'Connell SR; Alexander J; Bressler NM; Schachat AP; Zeimer R
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2003; 34(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 12569999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Digital fundus image grading with the non-mydriatic Visucam(PRO NM) versus the FF450(plus) camera in diabetic retinopathy.
Neubauer AS; Rothschuh A; Ulbig MW; Blum M
Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 86(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 17944975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of single-field nonmydriatic digital fundus image in screening for diabetic retinopathy.
Suansilpong A; Rawdaree P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Sep; 91(9):1397-403. PubMed ID: 18843870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Screening for sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy: comparison of fundus photography with automated color contrast threshold test.
Ong GL; Ripley LG; Newsom RS; Cooper M; Casswell AG
Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Mar; 137(3):445-52. PubMed ID: 15013866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sensitivity and specificity of digital retinal imaging for screening diabetic retinopathy.
Lopez-Bastida J; Cabrera-Lopez F; Serrano-Aguilar P
Diabet Med; 2007 Apr; 24(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 17298591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Screening for diabetic retinopathy by one-field, non-mydriatic, 45 degrees digital photography is inadequate.
Kuo HK; Hsieh HH; Liu RT
Ophthalmologica; 2005; 219(5):292-6. PubMed ID: 16123556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diabetic macular edema assessed with optical coherence tomography and stereo fundus photography.
Strøm C; Sander B; Larsen N; Larsen M; Lund-Andersen H
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Jan; 43(1):241-5. PubMed ID: 11773037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Screening for diabetic retinopathy in rural area using single-field, digital fundus images.
Ruamviboonsuk P; Wongcumchang N; Surawongsin P; Panyawatananukul E; Tiensuwan M
J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Feb; 88(2):176-80. PubMed ID: 15962667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Study of the efficiency of a non-mydriatic retinal camera in the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy].
Hernáez-Ortega MC; Soto-Pedre E; Vázquez JA; Gutiérrez MA; Asua J
Rev Clin Esp; 1998 Apr; 198(4):194-9. PubMed ID: 9633202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Evaluation of retinal thickness in macular region in diabetic patients with RTA analyzer].
Polaczek-Krupa B; Grabska-Liberek I; Terelak-Borys B
Klin Oczna; 2009; 111(4-6):119-21. PubMed ID: 19673438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Screening for diabetic retinopathy using a digital non-mydriatic camera compared with standard 35-mm stereo colour transparencies.
Hansen AB; Sander B; Larsen M; Kleener J; Borch-Johnsen K; Klein R; Lund-Andersen H
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Dec; 82(6):656-65. PubMed ID: 15606460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Web-based grading of compressed stereoscopic digital photography versus standard slide film photography for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy.
Rudnisky CJ; Tennant MT; Weis E; Ting A; Hinz BJ; Greve MD
Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1748-54. PubMed ID: 17368543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The sensitivity and specificity of nonmydriatic digital stereoscopic retinal imaging in detecting diabetic retinopathy.
Ahmed J; Ward TP; Bursell SE; Aiello LM; Cavallerano JD; Vigersky RA
Diabetes Care; 2006 Oct; 29(10):2205-9. PubMed ID: 17003294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic accuracy of non-mydriatic fundus camera for screening of diabetic retinopathy: A hospital based observational study in Pakistan.
Fahadullah M; Memon NA; Salim S; Ahsan S; Fahim MF; Mumtaz SN; Shaikh SA; Memon MS
J Pak Med Assoc; 2019 Mar; 69(3):378-382. PubMed ID: 30890831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Retinopathy screening in type 2 diabetes: reliability of wide angle fundus photography.
de Sonnaville JJ; van der Feltz van der Sloot D; Ernst L; Wijkel D; Heine RJ
Diabet Med; 1996 May; 13(5):482-6. PubMed ID: 8737032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Screening for diabetic retinopathy in a clinical setting: a comparison of direct ophthalmoscopy by primary care physicians with fundus photography.
Griffith SP; Freeman WL; Shaw CJ; Mitchell WH; Olden CR; Figgs LD; Kinyoun JL; Underwood DL; Will JC
J Fam Pract; 1993 Jul; 37(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 8345340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of automated fundus photograph analysis algorithms for detecting microaneurysms, haemorrhages and exudates, and of a computer-assisted diagnostic system for grading diabetic retinopathy.
Dupas B; Walter T; Erginay A; Ordonez R; Deb-Joardar N; Gain P; Klein JC; Massin P
Diabetes Metab; 2010 Jun; 36(3):213-20. PubMed ID: 20219404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
