These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2018968)

  • 1. Fetal rights: Supreme Court tosses ball back in Parliament's court.
    Kluge EH
    CMAJ; 1991 May; 144(9):1154-5. PubMed ID: 2018968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prenatal v. parental rights: what a difference an "a" makes.
    Gallagher A
    St Marys Law J; 1989; 21(2):301-24. PubMed ID: 16100799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When does life begin...or end? The California Supreme Court redefines murder in People v. Davis.
    Folger KB
    Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1994; 29(1):237-77. PubMed ID: 11654736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Criminal liability of physicians: an encroachment on the abortion right?
    Barber RA
    Am Crim Law Rev; 1981; 18(4):591-615. PubMed ID: 11655468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Effect of criminal justice on civil rights apprehension].
    Deutsch E
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 1998 Oct; 92(8-9):634-8. PubMed ID: 9885175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sui generis: the legal nature of the foetus in Canada.
    McConnell ML
    Can Bar Rev; 1991; 70():548-56. PubMed ID: 11656180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Current technology affecting Supreme Court abortion jurisprudence.
    Buckley M
    NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1982; 27(4):1221-60. PubMed ID: 11651778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Medical liability: the dilemma between civil and criminal justice].
    Moscoso-Matus K
    Rev Med Chil; 2016 Jul; 144(7):942-6. PubMed ID: 27661560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What the Court giveth: abortion and Bill C-43.
    Noonan SM
    Queens Law J; 1991; 16():321-45. PubMed ID: 11656415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Abortion: the father's rights.
    Gilbert RA
    Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1973; 42(3):441-67. PubMed ID: 11664234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Constitutional law--substantive due process--Pennsylvania Supreme Court holds that criminal defendant's best interests justify forcible medication.--Commonwealth v. Sam, 952 A.2d 565 (Pa. 2008).
    Harv Law Rev; 2009 May; 122(7):1961-8. PubMed ID: 19492499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Legal aspects of abortion practice.
    Goldman EB
    Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Mar; 13(1):135-43. PubMed ID: 3709009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Abortion and judicial review: of burdens and benefits, hard cases and some bad law.
    Bennett RW
    Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1981 Feb; 75(6):978-1017. PubMed ID: 11655428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An introduction to healthcare law.
    Bross W
    Ala Nurse; 2005; 32(2):8. PubMed ID: 16008336
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does a fetus have the right to life?
    European Court of Human Rights
    Bull Med Ethics; 2004 Aug; (200):20-1. PubMed ID: 15832481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Survey of abortion law.
    Platt JG; O'Malley K
    Ariz State Law J; 1980; 1980(1):67-216. PubMed ID: 11655392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fetal interests vs. maternal rights: is the state going too far?
    Trindel RM
    Akron Law Rev; 1991; 24(3-4):743-62. PubMed ID: 16273672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fetal rights and the prosecution of women for using drugs during pregnancy.
    Janssen ND
    Drake Law Rev; 2000; 48(4):741-68. PubMed ID: 12449973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Compensation claims. Pay-back time.
    Wilder G
    Health Serv J; 1997 Mar; 107(5545):28-31. PubMed ID: 10166504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inconsistencies in the legal status of an unborn child: recognition of a fetus as potential life.
    Shah MK
    Hofstra Law Rev; 2001; 29(3):931-69. PubMed ID: 16189918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.