These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20190322)

  • 1. Increased strain in the femoral neck following insertion of a resurfacing femoral prosthesis.
    Wik TS; Østbyhaug PO; Klaksvik J; Aamodt A
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Mar; 92(3):461-7. PubMed ID: 20190322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro measurement of strain in the bone cement surrounding the femoral component of total hip replacements during simulated gait and stair-climbing.
    O'Connor DO; Burke DW; Jasty M; Sedlacek RC; Harris WH
    J Orthop Res; 1996 Sep; 14(5):769-77. PubMed ID: 8893771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Changes in bone mineral density of the acetabulum, femoral neck and femoral shaft, after hip resurfacing and total hip replacement: two-year results from a randomised study.
    Penny JO; Brixen K; Varmarken JE; Ovesen O; Overgaard S
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Aug; 94(8):1036-44. PubMed ID: 22844043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Changes of the bone mineral density of proximal femur after hip resurfacing arthroplasty].
    Lian YY; Yoo MC; Pei FX; Cheng JQ; Feng W; Cho YJ; Kim GI; Chun SW
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Aug; 45(16):1091-4. PubMed ID: 18005605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experimental evaluation of new concepts in hip arthroplasty.
    Wik TS
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2012 Apr; 83(345):1-26. PubMed ID: 22489909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Alterations in femoral strain following hip resurfacing and total hip replacement.
    Deuel CR; Jamali AA; Stover SM; Hazelwood SJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Jan; 91(1):124-30. PubMed ID: 19092017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Deformation pattern and load transfer of an uncemented femoral stem with modular necks. An experimental study in human cadaver femurs.
    Enoksen CH; Gjerdet NR; Klaksvik J; Arthursson AJ; Schnell-Husby O; Wik TS
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2016 Feb; 32():28-33. PubMed ID: 26785385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Changes in bone mineral density in the proximal femur after hip resurfacing and uncemented total hip replacement: A prospective randomised controlled study.
    Smolders JM; Hol A; Rijnders T; van Susante JL
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Nov; 92(11):1509-14. PubMed ID: 21037344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of femoral neck fracture risk for a novel proximal epiphyseal hip prosthesis.
    Cristofolini L; Juszczyk M; Taddei F; Field RE; Rushton N; Viceconti M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Jul; 26(6):585-91. PubMed ID: 21334123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bone remodelling inside a cemented resurfaced femoral head.
    Gupta S; New AM; Taylor M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jul; 21(6):594-602. PubMed ID: 16542761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A plasma-sprayed titanium proximal coating reduces the risk of periprosthetic femoral fracture in cementless hip arthroplasty.
    Miles B; Walter WL; Kolos E; Waters T; Appleyard R; Gillies RM; Donohoo S; Ruys AJ
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 25(3):267-78. PubMed ID: 26407113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hip resurfacing femoral neck fracture influenced by valgus placement.
    Anglin C; Masri BA; Tonetti J; Hodgson AJ; Greidanus NV
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 465():71-9. PubMed ID: 17589356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlation between femoral neck version and strain on the femur after insertion of femoral prosthesis.
    Umeda N; Saito M; Sugano N; Ohzono K; Nishii T; Sakai T; Yoshikawa H; Ikeda D; Murakami A
    J Orthop Sci; 2003; 8(3):381-6. PubMed ID: 12768482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The biomechanical effect of notch size, notch location, and femur orientation on hip resurfacing failure.
    Morison Z; Olsen M; Higgins GA; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2013 Aug; 60(8):2214-21. PubMed ID: 23481682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanics of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Ong KL; Kurtz SM; Manley MT; Rushton N; Mohammed NA; Field RE
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Aug; 88(8):1110-5. PubMed ID: 16877617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fit of the uncemented femoral component and the use of cement influence the strain transfer the femoral cortex.
    Jasty M; O'Connor DO; Henshaw RM; Harrigan TP; Harris WH
    J Orthop Res; 1994 Sep; 12(5):648-56. PubMed ID: 7931781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Position of hip resurfacing component affects strain and resistance to fracture in the femoral neck.
    Vail TP; Glisson RR; Dominguez DE; Kitaoka K; Ottaviano D
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Sep; 90(9):1951-60. PubMed ID: 18762656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of the size of the component on the outcome of resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a review of the literature.
    Shimmin AJ; Walter WL; Esposito C
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Apr; 92(4):469-76. PubMed ID: 20357319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Femoral component positioning in resurfacing arthroplasty--effects on cortical strains.
    Kummer FJ; Pereira G; Schachter AK; Jaffe WL
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(4):341-6. PubMed ID: 20001936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Design considerations for ceramic resurfaced femoral head: effect of interface characteristics on failure mechanisms.
    Pal B; Gupta S; New AM
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2010; 13(2):143-55. PubMed ID: 19787497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.