These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2019039)

  • 21. The first 32 years of total hip arthroplasty. One surgeon's perspective.
    Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Jan; (274):6-11. PubMed ID: 1729023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Distal stem design and the torsional stability of cementless femoral stems.
    Kendrick JB; Noble PC; Tullos HS
    J Arthroplasty; 1995 Aug; 10(4):463-9. PubMed ID: 8523005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Loosening of the cemented hip prosthesis. The importance of heat injury.
    Mjöberg B
    Acta Orthop Scand Suppl; 1986; 221():1-40. PubMed ID: 3468743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mechanical evaluation of cadaver retrieval specimens of cementless bone-ingrown total hip arthroplasty femoral components.
    Whiteside LA; White SE; Engh CA; Head W
    J Arthroplasty; 1993 Apr; 8(2):147-55. PubMed ID: 8478633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Long-term results of femoral revision with the Wagner Self-Locking stem.
    Regis D; Sandri A; Bonetti I
    Surg Technol Int; 2013 Sep; 23():243-50. PubMed ID: 24081844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Micromotion measurements with hip center and modular neck length alterations.
    Doehring TC; Rubash HE; Dore DE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 May; (362):230-9. PubMed ID: 10335302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The anthropometric total hip femoral prosthesis. Preliminary clinical and roentgenographic findings of exact-fit cementless application.
    Amstutz HC; Nasser S; More RC; Kabo JM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 May; (242):104-19. PubMed ID: 2706844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cemented total hip replacement for primary osteoarthritis in patients aged 55 years or older: results of the 12 most common cemented implants followed for 25 years in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.
    Mäkelä K; Eskelinen A; Pulkkinen P; Paavolainen P; Remes V
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Dec; 90(12):1562-9. PubMed ID: 19043125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients with steroid-induced avascular necrosis of the hip. A 62-month follow-up study.
    Phillips FM; Pottenger LA; Finn HA; Vandermolen J
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Jun; (303):147-54. PubMed ID: 8194225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Revision total hip arthroplasty with titanium ingrowth prosthesis and bone grafting for failed cemented femoral component loosening.
    Gustilo RB; Pasternak HS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Oct; (235):111-9. PubMed ID: 3416518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Primary stability of custom and anatomical uncemented femoral stems: a method for three-dimensional in vitro measurement of implant stability.
    Østbyhaug PO; Klaksvik J; Romundstad P; Aamodt A
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2010 May; 25(4):318-24. PubMed ID: 20129726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Experimental method for the in vitro testing of the initial stability of cementless hip prostheses.
    Schneider E; Eulenberger J; Steiner W; Wyder D; Friedman RJ; Perren SM
    J Biomech; 1989; 22(6-7):735-44. PubMed ID: 2808455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dynamic test to diagnose loose uncemented femoral total hip components.
    Berger R; Fletcher F; Donaldson T; Wasielewski R; Peterson M; Rubash H
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1996 Sep; (330):115-23. PubMed ID: 8804281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The diagnostic value of digital subtraction arthrography and radionuclide bone scan in revision hip arthroplasty.
    Ovesen O; Riegels-Nielsen P; Lindequist S; Jensen I; Munkner T; Torfing T; Marving J
    J Arthroplasty; 2003 Sep; 18(6):735-40. PubMed ID: 14513446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Fixation of the Quatroloc femoral component: a biomechanical and clinical study.
    Whiteside LA; McCarthy DS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2001 Dec; (393):147-56. PubMed ID: 11764344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components.
    Engh CA; Massin P; Suthers KE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1990 Aug; (257):107-28. PubMed ID: 2199114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Combined multi-body and finite element investigation of the effect of the seat height on acetabular implant stability during the activity of getting up.
    Kunze M; Schaller A; Steinke H; Scholz R; Voigt C
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2012 Feb; 105(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 22018533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Prosthetic position in total hip replacement.
    Hamilton HW
    Orthop Rev; 1986 May; 15(5):294-300. PubMed ID: 3453937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Torsional stability of the femoral component of hip arthroplasty. Response to an anteriorly applied load.
    Nunn D; Freeman MA; Tanner KE; Bonfield W
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1989 May; 71(3):452-5. PubMed ID: 2722940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An analysis of screw fixation of the femoral component in cementless hip arthroplasty.
    Martin JW; Sugiyama H; Kaiser AD; Van Hoech J; Whiteside LA
    J Arthroplasty; 1990; 5 Suppl():S15-20. PubMed ID: 2243211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.