169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20191065)
1. The adjacent vessel sign on breast MRI: new data and a subgroup analysis for 1,084 histologically verified cases.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Herzog A; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
Korean J Radiol; 2010; 11(2):178-86. PubMed ID: 20191065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The hook sign for differential diagnosis of malignant from benign lesions in magnetic resonance mammography: experience in a study of 1084 histologically verified cases.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
Acta Radiol; 2010 Mar; 51(2):137-43. PubMed ID: 20092368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The necrosis sign in magnetic resonance-mammography: diagnostic accuracy in 1,084 histologically verified breast lesions.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Herzog A; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
Breast J; 2010; 16(6):603-8. PubMed ID: 21070437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic performance of ADC for Non-mass-like breast lesions on MR imaging.
Imamura T; Isomoto I; Sueyoshi E; Yano H; Uga T; Abe K; Hayashi T; Honda S; Yamaguchi T; Uetani M
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2010; 9(4):217-25. PubMed ID: 21187691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Magnetic resonance mammography of invasive lobular versus ductal carcinoma: systematic comparison of 811 patients reveals high diagnostic accuracy irrespective of typing.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Gröschel T; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010 Jul; 34(4):587-95. PubMed ID: 20657229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk-benefit analysis of preoperative breast MRI in patients with primary breast cancer.
Siegmann KC; Baur A; Vogel U; Kraemer B; Hahn M; Claussen CD
Clin Radiol; 2009 Apr; 64(4):403-13. PubMed ID: 19264186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) versus breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): A retrospective comparison in 66 breast lesions.
Li L; Roth R; Germaine P; Ren S; Lee M; Hunter K; Tinney E; Liao L
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2017 Feb; 98(2):113-123. PubMed ID: 27687829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-phase dynamic breast magnetic resonance imaging with two-way subtraction.
Choi N; Han BK; Choe YH; Kim HS
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2005; 29(6):834-41. PubMed ID: 16272861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adjacent vessel sign and breast imaging reporting and data system are valuable for diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions.
Zhao S; Tan R; Xiu J; Yuan X; Liu Q
Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip; 2014 Nov; 28(6):1121-1126. PubMed ID: 26019599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The adjacent vessel on dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI.
Fischer DR; Malich A; Wurdinger S; Boettcher J; Dietzel M; Kaiser WA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Aug; 187(2):W147-51. PubMed ID: 16861503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is there different correlation with prognostic factors between "non-mass" and "mass" type invasive ductal breast cancers?
Jiang L; Zhou Y; Wang Z; Lu X; Chen M; Zhou C
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Sep; 82(9):1404-9. PubMed ID: 23540946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Okafuji T; Kamitani T; Soeda H; Setoguchi T; Sakai S; Hatakenaka M; Kubo M; Sadanaga N; Yamamoto H; Honda H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1157-65. PubMed ID: 18972357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Role of breast MR imaging for predicting malignancy of histologically borderline lesions diagnosed at core needle biopsy: prospective evaluation.
Pediconi F; Padula S; Dominelli V; Luciani M; Telesca M; Casali V; Kirchin MA; Passariello R; Catalano C
Radiology; 2010 Dec; 257(3):653-61. PubMed ID: 20884914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lesion type and reader experience affect the diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI: a multiple reader ROC study.
Baltzer PAT; Kaiser WA; Dietzel M
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jan; 84(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 25466772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast combined with pharmacokinetic analysis of gadolinium-DTPA uptake in the diagnosis of local recurrence of early stage breast carcinoma.
Mussurakis S; Buckley DL; Bowsley SJ; Carleton PJ; Fox JN; Turnbull LW; Horsman A
Invest Radiol; 1995 Nov; 30(11):650-62. PubMed ID: 8557506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging as an adjunct to conventional breast MRI for improved positive predictive value.
Partridge SC; DeMartini WB; Kurland BF; Eby PR; White SW; Lehman CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Dec; 193(6):1716-22. PubMed ID: 19933670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Atypical ductal hyperplasia: breast DCE-MRI can be used to reduce unnecessary open surgical excision.
Bertani V; Urbani M; La Grassa M; Balestreri L; Berger N; Frauenfelder T; Boss A; Marcon M
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jul; 30(7):4069-4081. PubMed ID: 32144463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast lesions: evaluation with dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging and with T2*-weighted first-pass perfusion MR imaging.
Kvistad KA; Rydland J; Vainio J; Smethurst HB; Lundgren S; Fjøsne HE; Haraldseth O
Radiology; 2000 Aug; 216(2):545-53. PubMed ID: 10924584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is "prepectoral edema" a morphologic sign for malignant breast tumors?
Kaiser CG; Herold M; Baltzer PA; Dietzel M; Krammer J; Gajda M; Camara O; Schoenberg SO; Kaiser WA; Wasser K
Acad Radiol; 2015 Jun; 22(6):684-9. PubMed ID: 25784323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Suspicious breast lesions detected at 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging: clinical and histological outcomes.
Johnson KS; Baker JA; Lee SS; Soo MS
Acad Radiol; 2012 Jun; 19(6):667-74. PubMed ID: 22459645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]