195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20191066)
21. Textural features of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI derived model-free and model-based parameter maps in glioma grading.
Xie T; Chen X; Fang J; Kang H; Xue W; Tong H; Cao P; Wang S; Yang Y; Zhang W
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Apr; 47(4):1099-1111. PubMed ID: 28845594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [The value of DCE-MRI in predicting IDH gene mutation of high-grade gliomas].
Lu HT; Xing W; Zhang YW; Qin HP; Wu RH; Ding JL
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Oct; 99(39):3105-3109. PubMed ID: 31648456
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Quantitative analysis of signal intensities and contrast after fat suppression in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the spine.
Georgy BA; Hesselink JR; Middleton MS
Acad Radiol; 1996 Sep; 3(9):731-4. PubMed ID: 8883513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Value of whole body MRI and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in the diagnosis, follow-up and evaluation of disease activity and extent in multiple myeloma.
Dutoit JC; Vanderkerken MA; Verstraete KL
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Sep; 82(9):1444-52. PubMed ID: 23726124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Initial experience with dynamic MR imaging in evaluation of normal bone marrow versus malignant bone marrow infiltrations in humans.
Bollow M; Knauf W; Korfel A; Taupitz M; Schilling A; Wolf KJ; Hamm B
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1997; 7(1):241-50. PubMed ID: 9039623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Diagnosis of Spinal Lesions Using Heuristic and Pharmacokinetic Parameters Measured by Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI.
Lang N; Yuan H; Yu HJ; Su MY
Acad Radiol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):867-875. PubMed ID: 28162875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Differential diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma and nasopharyngeal lymphoma based on DCE-MRI and RESOLVE-DWI.
Song C; Cheng P; Cheng J; Zhang Y; Sun M; Xie S; Zhang X
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jan; 30(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 31372786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Detection of malignant bone marrow involvement with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Moulopoulos LA; Maris TG; Papanikolaou N; Panagi G; Vlahos L; Dimopoulos MA
Ann Oncol; 2003 Jan; 14(1):152-8. PubMed ID: 12488307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Blood perfusion of vertebral lesions evaluated with gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MRI: in comparison with compression fracture and metastasis.
Chen WT; Shih TT; Chen RC; Lo HY; Chou CT; Lee JM; Tu HY
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2002 Mar; 15(3):308-14. PubMed ID: 11891976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and correlation with tumor angiogenesis in bladder cancer.
Tuncbilek N; Kaplan M; Altaner S; Atakan IH; Süt N; Inci O; Demir MK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Apr; 192(4):949-55. PubMed ID: 19304699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Prevalence and patterns of renal involvement in imaging of malignant lymphoproliferative diseases.
Bach AG; Behrmann C; Holzhausen HJ; Katzer M; Arnold D; Spielmann RP; Surov A
Acta Radiol; 2012 Apr; 53(3):343-8. PubMed ID: 22287149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma perfusion MRI: Comparison of arterial spin labeling and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Xiao B; Wang P; Zhao Y; Liu Y; Ye Z
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 May; 99(22):e20503. PubMed ID: 32481470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Prognostic significance of increased bone marrow microcirculation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: results of a prospective DCE-MRI study.
Merz M; Moehler TM; Ritsch J; Bäuerle T; Zechmann CM; Wagner B; Jauch A; Hose D; Kunz C; Hielscher T; Laue H; Goldschmidt H; Delorme S; Hillengass J
Eur Radiol; 2016 May; 26(5):1404-11. PubMed ID: 26215436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Perfusion of subchondral bone marrow in knee osteoarthritis: A dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging preliminary study.
Budzik JF; Ding J; Norberciak L; Pascart T; Toumi H; Verclytte S; Coursier R
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 88():129-134. PubMed ID: 28189197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Vertebral bone marrow perfusion evaluated with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging: significance of aging and sex.
Chen WT; Shih TT; Chen RC; Lo SY; Chou CT; Lee JM; Tu HY
Radiology; 2001 Jul; 220(1):213-8. PubMed ID: 11426000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Differentiation of myeloma and metastatic cancer in the spine using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Lang N; Su MY; Yu HJ; Lin M; Hamamura MJ; Yuan H
Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Oct; 31(8):1285-91. PubMed ID: 23290477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating intraosseous cleft formation in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures before vertebroplasty.
Lin WC; Chen HL; Lu CH; Wang HC; Wu RW; Cheng YF; Lui CC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jul; 36(15):1244-50. PubMed ID: 21217458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Differentiating benign from malignant vertebral fractures using T1 -weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Arevalo-Perez J; Peck KK; Lyo JK; Holodny AI; Lis E; Karimi S
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Oct; 42(4):1039-47. PubMed ID: 25656545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessment of active and inactive sacroiliitis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis using quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Zhang M; Zhou L; Huang N; Zeng H; Liu S; Liu L
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jul; 46(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 27865027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Is there a need for contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI of the spine after inconspicuous short tau inversion recovery imaging?
Mahnken AH; Wildberger JE; Adam G; Stanzel S; Schmitz-Rode T; Günther RW; Buecker A
Eur Radiol; 2005 Jul; 15(7):1387-92. PubMed ID: 15776239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
