These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20191415)

  • 1. The validity of driving simulation for assessing differences between in-vehicle informational interfaces: A comparison with field testing.
    Wang Y; Mehler B; Reimer B; Lammers V; D'Ambrosio LA; Coughlin JF
    Ergonomics; 2010 Mar; 53(3):404-20. PubMed ID: 20191415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. To twist or poke? A method for identifying usability issues with the rotary controller and touch screen for control of in-vehicle information systems.
    Harvey C; Stanton NA; Pickering CA; McDonald M; Zheng P
    Ergonomics; 2011 Jul; 54(7):609-25. PubMed ID: 21770749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of menu structure and touch screen scrolling style on the variability of glance durations during in-vehicle visual search tasks.
    Kujala T; Saariluoma P
    Ergonomics; 2011 Aug; 54(8):716-32. PubMed ID: 21846310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validating a driving simulator using surrogate safety measures.
    Yan X; Abdel-Aty M; Radwan E; Wang X; Chilakapati P
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Jan; 40(1):274-88. PubMed ID: 18215559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing drivers' visual attention at Junctions in Real and Simulated Environments.
    Robbins CJ; Allen HA; Chapman P
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Oct; 80():89-101. PubMed ID: 31280814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of display position of a visual in-vehicle task on simulated driving.
    Wittmann M; Kiss M; Gugg P; Steffen A; Fink M; Pöppel E; Kamiya H
    Appl Ergon; 2006 Mar; 37(2):187-99. PubMed ID: 16118009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationships between driving simulator performance and driving test results.
    de Winter JC; de Groot S; Mulder M; Wieringa PA; Dankelman J; Mulder JA
    Ergonomics; 2009 Feb; 52(2):137-53. PubMed ID: 18972239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Safety implications of providing real-time feedback to distracted drivers.
    Donmez B; Boyle LN; Lee JD
    Accid Anal Prev; 2007 May; 39(3):581-90. PubMed ID: 17109807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On-road and simulated driving: concurrent and discriminant validation.
    Mayhew DR; Simpson HM; Wood KM; Lonero L; Clinton KM; Johnson AG
    J Safety Res; 2011 Aug; 42(4):267-75. PubMed ID: 22017829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fluctuating attentional demand in a simulated driving assessment: the roles of age and driving complexity.
    Stinchcombe A; Gagnon S; Zhang JJ; Montembeault P; Bedard M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Dec; 12(6):576-87. PubMed ID: 22133333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mitigating driver distraction with retrospective and concurrent feedback.
    Donmez B; Boyle LN; Lee JD
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Mar; 40(2):776-86. PubMed ID: 18329433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of two human-machine-interfaces for cooperative maneuver-based driving.
    Franz B; Kauer M; Blanke A; Schreiber M; Bruder R; Geyer S
    Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():4192-9. PubMed ID: 22317365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of cognitive workload on physiological arousal in young adult drivers: a field study and simulation validation.
    Reimer B; Mehler B
    Ergonomics; 2011 Oct; 54(10):932-42. PubMed ID: 21973004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects on driving performance of interacting with an in-vehicle music player: a comparison of three interface layout concepts for information presentation.
    Mitsopoulos-Rubens E; Trotter MJ; Lenné MG
    Appl Ergon; 2011 May; 42(4):583-91. PubMed ID: 20869694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of manual vs. speech-based interaction with in-vehicle information systems.
    Maciej J; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2009 Sep; 41(5):924-30. PubMed ID: 19664428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Amnesia and driving.
    Anderson SW; Rizzo M; Skaar N; Stierman L; Cavaco S; Dawson J; Damasio H
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2007 Jan; 29(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 17162717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Traffic calming along rural highways crossing small urban communities: driving simulator experiment.
    Galante F; Mauriello F; Montella A; Pernetti M; Aria M; D'Ambrosio A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Nov; 42(6):1585-94. PubMed ID: 20728607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The development and clinical trial of a Driving Simulator for the handicapped.
    Ku J; Jang D; Ahn H; Lee J; Kim JA; Lee B; Kim IY; Kim SI
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 85():240-6. PubMed ID: 15458094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Haptic gas pedal feedback.
    Mulder M; Mulder M; van Paassen MM; Abbink DA
    Ergonomics; 2008 Nov; 51(11):1710-20. PubMed ID: 18941976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of perceptual treatments on driver's behavior: from driving simulator studies to field tests--first results.
    Auberlet JM; Rosey F; Anceaux F; Aubin S; Briand P; Pacaux MP; Plainchault P
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Mar; 45():91-8. PubMed ID: 22269489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.