These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20191712)

  • 21. Evaluation of the implementation of nursing diagnoses, interventions, and outcomes.
    Müller-Staub M
    Int J Nurs Terminol Classif; 2009; 20(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 19207524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Methodological issues of randomized controlled trials for the evaluation of reproductive health interventions.
    Villar J; Carroli G
    Prev Med; 1996; 25(3):365-75. PubMed ID: 8781015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An exemplar of the use of NNN language in developing evidence-based practice guidelines.
    Kautz DD; Van Horn ER
    Int J Nurs Terminol Classif; 2008; 19(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 18331480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Methodological issues associated with group intervention research.
    Murphy SA; Johnson LC
    Arch Psychiatr Nurs; 2006 Dec; 20(6):276-81. PubMed ID: 17145455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Blinding protocols, treatment credibility, and expectancy: methodologic issues in clinical trials of osteopathic manipulative treatment.
    Licciardone JC; Russo DP
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2006 Aug; 106(8):457-63. PubMed ID: 16943515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Bias in clinical intervention research.
    Gluud LL
    Am J Epidemiol; 2006 Mar; 163(6):493-501. PubMed ID: 16443796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of education on hypothetical and actual oxygen administration decisions.
    Considine J; Botti M; Thomas S
    Nurse Educ Today; 2007 Aug; 27(6):651-60. PubMed ID: 17118496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Pseudo cluster randomization performed well when used in practice.
    Melis RJ; Teerenstra S; Rikkert MG; Borm GF
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Nov; 61(11):1169-75. PubMed ID: 18550331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Practice of systematic reviews. VI. Searching, selection and methodological evaluation of etiological research].
    van der Windt DA; Zeegers MP; Kemper HC; Assendelft WJ; Scholten RJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jun; 144(25):1210-4. PubMed ID: 10897300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The truncation-by-death problem: what to do in an experimental evaluation when the outcome is not always defined.
    McConnell S; Stuart EA; Devaney B
    Eval Rev; 2008 Apr; 32(2):157-86. PubMed ID: 18319423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A guide to interpreting discordant systematic reviews.
    Jadad AR; Cook DJ; Browman GP
    CMAJ; 1997 May; 156(10):1411-6. PubMed ID: 9164400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of a MS specialist nurse programme.
    Forbes A; While A; Mathes L; Griffiths P
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2006 Nov; 43(8):985-1000. PubMed ID: 16412443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Outcomes and effectiveness research: capacity building for nurse researchers at the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
    Hubbard H; Walker PH; Clancy CM; Stryer D
    Outcomes Manag; 2002; 6(4):146-51. PubMed ID: 12385165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The importance of covariate selection in controlling for selection bias in observational studies.
    Steiner PM; Cook TD; Shadish WR; Clark MH
    Psychol Methods; 2010 Sep; 15(3):250-67. PubMed ID: 20822251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Blinding in randomized clinical trials: imposed impartiality.
    Hróbjartsson A; Boutron I
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2011 Nov; 90(5):732-6. PubMed ID: 21993424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Randomization, permuted blocks, masking, allocation concealment, and selection bias in the Tobacco Quit Line Study.
    Berger VW
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 May; 31(3):201. PubMed ID: 20219696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A framework for evidence evaluation and methodological issues in implantable device studies.
    Sedrakyan A; Marinac-Dabic D; Normand SL; Mushlin A; Gross T
    Med Care; 2010 Jun; 48(6 Suppl):S121-8. PubMed ID: 20421824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Selection bias and information bias in clinical research.
    Tripepi G; Jager KJ; Dekker FW; Zoccali C
    Nephron Clin Pract; 2010; 115(2):c94-9. PubMed ID: 20407272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A framework for classifying study designs to evaluate health care interventions.
    Reeves BC
    Forsch Komplementarmed Klass Naturheilkd; 2004 Aug; 11 Suppl 1():13-7. PubMed ID: 15353897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Bias: a review of current understanding.
    Adebiyi AO
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 2010 Sep; 39(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 21416795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.