BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

619 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20191832)

  • 1. Training on a virtual reality simulator--is it really possible a correct evaluation of the surgeons' experience?
    Moldovanu R; Târcoveanu E; Lupaşcu C; Dimofte G; Filip V; Vlad N; Vasilescu A
    Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2009; 113(3):780-7. PubMed ID: 20191832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Simulation training in surgical education - application of virtual reality laparoscopic simulators in a surgical skills course].
    Lehmann KS; Gröne J; Lauscher JC; Ritz JP; Holmer C; Pohlen U; Buhr HJ
    Zentralbl Chir; 2012 Apr; 137(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 22495487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Objective evaluation of minimally invasive surgical skills for transplantation. Surgeons using a virtual reality simulator.
    Dănilă R; Gerdes B; Ulrike H; Domínguez Fernández E; Hassan I
    Chirurgia (Bucur); 2009; 104(2):181-5. PubMed ID: 19499661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Learning rate for laparoscopic surgical skills on MIST VR, a virtual reality simulator: quality of human-computer interface.
    Chaudhry A; Sutton C; Wood J; Stone R; McCloy R
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1999 Jul; 81(4):281-6. PubMed ID: 10615201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of virtual reality to teach and assess psychomotor skills in laparoscopic surgery: results from randomised controlled studies using the MIST VR laparoscopic simulator.
    Taffinder N; Sutton C; Fishwick RJ; McManus IC; Darzi A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1998; 50():124-30. PubMed ID: 10180527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Systematic review of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of virtual reality training for laparoscopic surgery (Br J Surg 2008; 95: 1088-1097).
    Walker K
    Br J Surg; 2009 Feb; 96(2):222; author reply 222-3. PubMed ID: 19160354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Training on a virtual reality laparoscopic simulator improves performance of an unfamiliar live laparoscopic procedure.
    Lucas SM; Zeltser IS; Bensalah K; Tuncel A; Jenkins A; Pearle MS; Cadeddu JA
    J Urol; 2008 Dec; 180(6):2588-91; discussion 2591. PubMed ID: 18950817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Training in laparoscopic urology.
    Laguna MP; de Reijke TM; Wijkstra H; de la Rosette J
    Curr Opin Urol; 2006 Mar; 16(2):65-70. PubMed ID: 16479206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Construct validity of the ProMIS laparoscopic simulator.
    Gilliam AD
    Surg Endosc; 2009 May; 23(5):1150. PubMed ID: 19263163
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Virtual reality in laparoscopic surgery.
    Uranüs S; Yanik M; Bretthauer G
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 104():151-5. PubMed ID: 15747974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contemporary virtual reality laparoscopy simulators: quicksand or solid grounds for assessing surgical trainees?
    Thijssen AS; Schijven MP
    Am J Surg; 2010 Apr; 199(4):529-41. PubMed ID: 20080227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perception and use of minimal access surgery simulators in pediatric surgery training programs.
    Lasko D; Zamakhshary M; Gerstle JT
    J Pediatr Surg; 2009 May; 44(5):1009-12. PubMed ID: 19433188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What is going on in augmented reality simulation in laparoscopic surgery?
    Botden SM; Jakimowicz JJ
    Surg Endosc; 2009 Aug; 23(8):1693-700. PubMed ID: 18813987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laparoscopic skills training and assessment.
    Aggarwal R; Moorthy K; Darzi A
    Br J Surg; 2004 Dec; 91(12):1549-58. PubMed ID: 15547882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Virtual reality simulator training for laparoscopic colectomy: what metrics have construct validity?
    Shanmugan S; Leblanc F; Senagore AJ; Ellis CN; Stein SL; Khan S; Delaney CP; Champagne BJ
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Feb; 57(2):210-4. PubMed ID: 24401883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Markov modeling of minimally invasive surgery based on tool/tissue interaction and force/torque signatures for evaluating surgical skills.
    Rosen J; Hannaford B; Richards CG; Sinanan MN
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2001 May; 48(5):579-91. PubMed ID: 11341532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Virtual reality in surgical training.
    Lange T; Indelicato DJ; Rosen JM
    Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 2000 Jan; 9(1):61-79, vii. PubMed ID: 10601525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Identifying and classifying problem areas in laparoscopic skills acquisition: can simulators help?
    Greco EF; Regehr G; Okrainec A
    Acad Med; 2010 Oct; 85(10 Suppl):S5-8. PubMed ID: 20881704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: what is the difference? A comparison of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator.
    Botden SM; Buzink SN; Schijven MP; Jakimowicz JJ
    World J Surg; 2007 Apr; 31(4):764-72. PubMed ID: 17361356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Single-session baseline virtual reality simulator scores predict technical performance for laparoscopic colectomy: a study in the swine model.
    Araujo SE; Seid VE; Bertoncini AB; Horcel LA; Nahas SC; Cecconello I
    J Surg Educ; 2014; 71(6):883-91. PubMed ID: 24994032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.