284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20192540)
21. The effect of grammatical gender on object categorization.
Cubelli R; Paolieri D; Lotto L; Job R
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):449-60. PubMed ID: 21261427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Priming nouns and verbs: differential influences of semantic and grammatical cues in the two cerebral hemispheres.
Arambel SR; Chiarello C
Brain Lang; 2006 Apr; 97(1):12-24. PubMed ID: 16099493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The gender congruency effect and the selection of freestanding and bound morphemes: evidence from croatian.
Costa A; Kovacic D; Fedorenko E; Caramazza A
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1270-82. PubMed ID: 14622060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Lexical competition during second-language listening: sentence context, but not proficiency, constrains interference from the native lexicon.
Chambers CG; Cooke H
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):1029-40. PubMed ID: 19586268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Short-term retention of lexical-semantic representations: Implications for speech production.
Martin RC; Freedman ML
Memory; 2001 Jul; 9(4):261-280. PubMed ID: 11747582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Lexical access in the production of noun phrases.
Schriefers H
Cognition; 1992 Oct; 45(1):33-54. PubMed ID: 1424498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Role of grammatical gender and semantics in German word production.
Vigliocco G; Vinson DP; Indefrey P; Levelt WJ; Hellwig F
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Mar; 30(2):483-97. PubMed ID: 14979819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Exploring the activation of semantic and phonological codes during speech planning with event-related brain potentials.
Jescheniak JD; Schriefers H; Garrett MF; Friederici AD
J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Aug; 14(6):951-64. PubMed ID: 12191461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Planning in sentence production: evidence for the phrase as a default planning scope.
Martin RC; Crowther JE; Knight M; Tamborello FP; Yang CL
Cognition; 2010 Aug; 116(2):177-92. PubMed ID: 20501338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Horizontal information flow in spoken sentence production.
Smith M; Wheeldon L
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 May; 30(3):675-86. PubMed ID: 15099135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The association between age and the frequency of nouns selected for production.
Kavé G; Samuel-Enoch K; Adiv S
Psychol Aging; 2009 Mar; 24(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 19290734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Is lexical access autonomous? Evidence from combining overlapping tasks with recording event-related brain potentials.
Rabovsky M; Alvarez CJ; Hohlfeld A; Sommer W
Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1222():156-65. PubMed ID: 18585684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Can word formation be understood or understanded by semantics alone?
Gordon P; Miozzo M
Cogn Psychol; 2008 Feb; 56(1):30-72. PubMed ID: 17498681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Word decoding and picture naming in children with a reading disability.
Assink EM; Soeteman WP; Knuijt PP
Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr; 1999 Aug; 125(3):251-68. PubMed ID: 10441874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Lateral inferotemporal cortex maintains conceptual-semantic representations in verbal working memory.
Fiebach CJ; Friederici AD; Smith EE; Swinney D
J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Dec; 19(12):2035-49. PubMed ID: 17892385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. High level processing scope in spoken sentence production.
Smith M; Wheeldon L
Cognition; 1999 Dec; 73(3):205-46. PubMed ID: 10585515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The dynamic microstructure of speech production: semantic interference built on the fly.
Abdel Rahman R; Melinger A
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):149-61. PubMed ID: 20854006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading.
Hoeks JC; Stowe LA; Doedens G
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Mar; 19(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 14972359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Processing the universal quantifier during sentence comprehension: ERP evidence.
Jiang X; Tan Y; Zhou X
Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jul; 47(8-9):1799-815. PubMed ID: 19428412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Garlic and ginger are not like apples and oranges: Effects of mass/count information on the production of noun phrases in English.
Fieder N; Nickels L; Krajenbrink T; Biedermann B
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Mar; 71(3):717-748. PubMed ID: 28056624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
