BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20192544)

  • 1. Differentiation and response bias in episodic memory: evidence from reaction time distributions.
    Criss AH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):484-99. PubMed ID: 20192544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The distribution of subjective memory strength: list strength and response bias.
    Criss AH
    Cogn Psychol; 2009 Dec; 59(4):297-319. PubMed ID: 19765699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigating strength and frequency effects in recognition memory using type-2 signal detection theory.
    Higham PA; Perfect TJ; Bruno D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):57-80. PubMed ID: 19210081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Remember-Know and source memory instructions can qualitatively change old-new recognition accuracy: the modality-match effect in recognition memory.
    Mulligan NW; Besken M; Peterson D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):558-66. PubMed ID: 20192551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interference and the representation of order within associations.
    Rehani M; Caplan JB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jul; 64(7):1409-29. PubMed ID: 21598202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Category-based errors and the accessibility of unbiased spatial memories: a retrieval model.
    Sampaio C; Wang RF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1331-7. PubMed ID: 19686025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. fMRI evidence of word frequency and strength effects during episodic memory encoding.
    de Zubicaray GI; McMahon KL; Eastburn MM; Finnigan S; Humphreys MS
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Mar; 22(3):439-50. PubMed ID: 15722213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Encoding modality can affect memory accuracy via retrieval orientation.
    Pierce BH; Gallo DA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):516-21. PubMed ID: 21261425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Age and response bias: evidence from the strength-based mirror effect.
    Criss AH; Aue W; Kılıç A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Oct; 67(10):1910-24. PubMed ID: 24386987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The list-strength effect in recall: relative-strength competition and retrieval inhibition may both contribute to forgetting.
    Verde MF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):205-20. PubMed ID: 19210091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using maintenance rehearsal to explore recognition memory.
    Humphreys MS; Maguire AM; McFarlane KA; Burt JS; Bolland SW; Murray KL; Dunn R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):147-59. PubMed ID: 20053051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Eye movements and prospective memory: what the eyes can tell us about prospective memory.
    West R; Carlson L; Cohen AL
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Jun; 64(3):269-77. PubMed ID: 17112615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A differentiation account of recognition memory: evidence from fMRI.
    Criss AH; Wheeler ME; McClelland JL
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2013 Mar; 25(3):421-35. PubMed ID: 23092213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Amount of postcue encoding predicts amount of directed forgetting.
    Pastötter B; Bäuml KH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 20053044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.
    Peters JC; Goebel R; Roelfsema PR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18702589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attentional requirements for the selection of words from different grammatical categories.
    Ayora P; Janssen N; Dell'acqua R; Alario FX
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1344-51. PubMed ID: 19686027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Repetition effects in associative false recognition: Theme-based criterion shifts are the exception, not the rule.
    Starns JJ; Hicks JL; Marsh RL
    Memory; 2006 Aug; 14(6):742-61. PubMed ID: 16829490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distinctive items are salient during encoding: delayed judgements of learning predict the isolation effect.
    Geraci L; Manzano I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):50-64. PubMed ID: 19370485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dissociating the "retrieval success" regions of the brain: effects of retrieval delay.
    Huijbers W; Pennartz CM; Daselaar SM
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jan; 48(2):491-7. PubMed ID: 19835893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Heightened false memory: a long-term sequela of severe closed head injury.
    Ries M; Marks W
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(12):2233-40. PubMed ID: 16814819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.