BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20192544)

  • 21. Different confidence-accuracy relationships for feature-based and familiarity-based memories.
    Reinitz MT; Peria WJ; Séguin JA; Loftus GR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):507-15. PubMed ID: 21299332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dissociating source memory decisions in the prefrontal cortex: fMRI of diagnostic and disqualifying monitoring.
    Gallo DA; McDonough IM; Scimeca J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 May; 22(5):955-69. PubMed ID: 19413478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Event-related fMRI studies of episodic encoding and retrieval: meta-analyses using activation likelihood estimation.
    Spaniol J; Davidson PS; Kim AS; Han H; Moscovitch M; Grady CL
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jul; 47(8-9):1765-79. PubMed ID: 19428409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Individual differences in incorrect responding and the ability to discriminate the source of the products of retrieval.
    Jonker TR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jul; 42(7):1078-89. PubMed ID: 26727125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Examining the relationships among item recognition, source recognition, and recall from an individual differences perspective.
    Unsworth N; Brewer GA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1578-85. PubMed ID: 19857028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Enhanced processing fluency leads to biases in source memory.
    Kurilla BP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Aug; 64(8):1609-31. PubMed ID: 21749224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Individual differences in working memory capacity and episodic retrieval: examining the dynamics of delayed and continuous distractor free recall.
    Unsworth N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):1020-34. PubMed ID: 17983310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Recognition memory for studied words is determined by cortical activation differences at encoding but not during retrieval.
    Chee MW; Goh JO; Lim Y; Graham S; Lee K
    Neuroimage; 2004 Aug; 22(4):1456-65. PubMed ID: 15275903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Theoretical correlations and measured correlations: relating recognition and recall in four distributed memory models.
    Kahana MJ; Rizzuto DS; Schneider AR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Sep; 31(5):933-53. PubMed ID: 16248743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The strategic nature of false recognition in the DRM paradigm.
    Miller MB; Guerin SA; Wolford GL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1228-35. PubMed ID: 21767060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A global theory of remembering and forgetting from multiple lists.
    Lehman M; Malmberg KJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):970-88. PubMed ID: 19586264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The similarities (and familiarities) of pseudowords and extremely high-frequency words: examining a familiarity-based explanation of the pseudoword effect.
    Ozubko JD; Joordens S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):123-39. PubMed ID: 21058876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Testing probability matching and episodic retrieval accounts of response repetition effects in task switching.
    Altmann EM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):935-51. PubMed ID: 21728467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The influence of encoding intention on electrophysiological indices of recognition memory.
    van Hooff JC
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2005 Apr; 56(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 15725487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cue strength as a moderator of the testing effect: the benefits of elaborative retrieval.
    Carpenter SK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1563-9. PubMed ID: 19857026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Retrieval orientation and the control of recollection.
    Herron JE; Rugg MD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):843-54. PubMed ID: 14511537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The response dynamics of recognition memory: Sensitivity and bias.
    Koop GJ; Criss AH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 May; 42(5):671-85. PubMed ID: 26595069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Theoretical implications of extralist probes for directed forgetting.
    Sahakyan L; Goodmon LB
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):920-37. PubMed ID: 20565210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Diffusion model drift rates can be influenced by decision processes: an analysis of the strength-based mirror effect.
    Starns JJ; Ratcliff R; White CN
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Sep; 38(5):1137-51. PubMed ID: 22545609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Remembering in contradictory minds: disjunction fallacies in episodic memory.
    Brainerd CJ; Reyna VF; Aydin C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):711-35. PubMed ID: 20438268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.