252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20192550)
1. Comprehension as a basis for metacognitive judgments: effects of effort after meaning on recall and metacognition.
Zaromb FM; Karpicke JD; Roediger HL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):552-7. PubMed ID: 20192550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Metacognition and mindreading: judgments of learning for Self and Other during self-paced study.
Koriat A; Ackerman R
Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):251-64. PubMed ID: 20096606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The interplay between value and relatedness as bases for metacognitive monitoring and control: evidence for agenda-based monitoring.
Soderstrom NC; McCabe DP
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1236-42. PubMed ID: 21574750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Judgments of learning reflect encoding fluency: conclusive evidence for the ease-of-processing hypothesis.
Undorf M; Erdfelder E
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1264-9. PubMed ID: 21574748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Judgments of learning do not reduce to memory encoding operations: event-related potential evidence for distinct metacognitive processes.
Skavhaug IM; Wilding EL; Donaldson DI
Brain Res; 2010 Mar; 1318():87-95. PubMed ID: 19968975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How many dimensions underlie judgments of learning and recall? Evidence from state-trace methodology.
Jang Y; Nelson TO
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Aug; 134(3):308-26. PubMed ID: 16131266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using standards to improve middle school students' accuracy at evaluating the quality of their recall.
Lipko AR; Dunlosky J; Hartwig MK; Rawson KA; Swan K; Cook D
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Dec; 15(4):307-18. PubMed ID: 20025417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An investigation of increases in metamemory confidence across multiple study trials.
Tiede HL; Derksen C; Leboe JP
Memory; 2009 Apr; 17(3):288-300. PubMed ID: 19169925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The memorizing effort heuristic in judgments of learning: a developmental perspective.
Koriat A; Ackerman R; Lockl K; Schneider W
J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Mar; 102(3):265-79. PubMed ID: 19084238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measuring memory monitoring with judgements of retention (JORs).
Tauber SK; Rhodes MG
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(7):1376-96. PubMed ID: 22524495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effects of "effort after meaning" on recall: differences in within- and between-subjects designs.
Zaromb FM; Roediger HL
Mem Cognit; 2009 Jun; 37(4):447-63. PubMed ID: 19460952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improving college students' evaluation of text learning using idea-unit standards.
Dunlosky J; Hartwig MK; Rawson KA; Lipko AR
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Mar; 64(3):467-84. PubMed ID: 20700858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Judgments of learning as memory modifiers.
Soderstrom NC; Clark CT; Halamish V; Bjork EL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Mar; 41(2):553-8. PubMed ID: 25528101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Attributing study effort to data-driven and goal-driven effects: implications for metacognitive judgments.
Koriat A; Nussinson R
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1338-43. PubMed ID: 19686026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of categorical relatedness on judgements of learning (JOLs).
Matvey G; Dunlosky J; Schwartz BL
Memory; 2006 Feb; 14(2):253-61. PubMed ID: 16484114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mending metacognitive illusions: a comparison of mnemonic-based and theory-based procedures.
Koriat A; Bjork RA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Sep; 32(5):1133-45. PubMed ID: 16938051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Metacognition influences item-method directed forgetting.
Foster NL; Sahakyan L
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Sep; 38(5):1309-24. PubMed ID: 22468801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Harmful effects of preexisting inappropriate highlighting on reading comprehension and metacognitive accuracy.
Gier VS; Kreiner DS; Natz-Gonzalez A
J Gen Psychol; 2009 Jul; 136(3):287-300. PubMed ID: 19650523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A stochastic detection and retrieval model for the study of metacognition.
Jang Y; Wallsten TS; Huber DE
Psychol Rev; 2012 Jan; 119(1):186-200. PubMed ID: 22059901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Framing affects scale usage for judgments of learning, not confidence in memory.
England BD; Ortegren FR; Serra MJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1898-1908. PubMed ID: 28504530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
