These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20193071)

  • 1. International genomic evaluation methods for dairy cattle.
    VanRaden PM; Sullivan PG
    Genet Sel Evol; 2010 Mar; 42(1):7. PubMed ID: 20193071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Invited review: A quarter of a century-International genetic evaluation of dairy sires using MACE methodology.
    Nilforooshan MA; Jorjani H
    J Dairy Sci; 2022 Jan; 105(1):3-21. PubMed ID: 34756440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. National single-step genomic method that integrates multi-national genomic information.
    Vandenplas J; Spehar M; Potocnik K; Gengler N; Gorjanc G
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Jan; 100(1):465-478. PubMed ID: 27865486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Including overseas performance information in genomic evaluations of Australian dairy cattle.
    Haile-Mariam M; Pryce JE; Schrooten C; Hayes BJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 May; 98(5):3443-59. PubMed ID: 25771052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A simple method for genomic selection of moderately sized dairy cattle populations.
    Weller JI; Ron M; Glick G; Shirak A; Zeron Y; Ezra E
    Animal; 2012 Feb; 6(2):193-202. PubMed ID: 22436176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Application of a multiple-trait, multiple-country genetic evaluation model for female fertility traits.
    Nilforooshan MA; Jakobsen JH; Fikse WF; Berglund B; Jorjani H
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Dec; 93(12):5977-86. PubMed ID: 21094772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of a single-step approach for integrating foreign information into national genomic evaluation in Holstein cattle.
    Guarini AR; Lourenco DAL; Brito LF; Sargolzaei M; Baes CF; Miglior F; Tsuruta S; Misztal I; Schenkel FS
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Sep; 102(9):8175-8183. PubMed ID: 31301840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bayesian single-step genomic evaluations combining local and foreign information in Walloon Holsteins.
    Colinet FG; Vandenplas J; Vanderick S; Hammami H; Mota RR; Gillon A; Hubin X; Bertozzi C; Gengler N
    Animal; 2018 May; 12(5):898-905. PubMed ID: 29032781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prior (co)variances can improve multiple-trait across-country evaluations of weakly linked bull populations.
    Mark T; Madsen P; Jensen J; Fikse WF
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Sep; 88(9):3290-302. PubMed ID: 16107419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multiple-trait multiple-country genetic evaluations for udder health traits.
    Mark T; Sullivan PG
    J Dairy Sci; 2006 Dec; 89(12):4874-85. PubMed ID: 17106118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Across-countries genomic prediction using national breeding values or multitrait across-countries evaluation breeding values.
    Sallam M; Benhajali H; Savoia S; de Koning DJ; Strandberg E
    J Dairy Sci; 2022 Apr; 105(4):3282-3295. PubMed ID: 35123777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Value of sharing cow reference population between countries on reliability of genomic prediction for milk yield traits.
    Haile-Mariam M; MacLeod IM; Bolormaa S; Schrooten C; O'Connor E; de Jong G; Daetwyler HD; Pryce JE
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Feb; 103(2):1711-1728. PubMed ID: 31864746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genomic evaluation of Brown Swiss dairy cattle with limited national genotype data and integrated external information.
    Luštrek B; Vandenplas J; Gorjanc G; Potočnik K
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 May; 104(5):5738-5754. PubMed ID: 33685705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genomic prediction of residual feed intake in US Holstein dairy cattle.
    Li B; VanRaden PM; Guduk E; O'Connell JR; Null DJ; Connor EE; VandeHaar MJ; Tempelman RJ; Weigel KA; Cole JB
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Mar; 103(3):2477-2486. PubMed ID: 31954583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of a national genomic preselection on the international genetic evaluations.
    Patry C; Jorjani H; Ducrocq V
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 May; 96(5):3272-84. PubMed ID: 23477823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are evaluations on young genotyped animals benefiting from the past generations?
    Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Aguilar I; Lawlor TJ; Forni S; Weller JI
    J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(6):3930-42. PubMed ID: 24679931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genomic selection strategies in a small dairy cattle population evaluated for genetic gain and profit.
    Thomasen JR; Egger-Danner C; Willam A; Guldbrandtsen B; Lund MS; Sørensen AC
    J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(1):458-70. PubMed ID: 24239076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of performance records and national breeding values as input into international genetic evaluation.
    Fikse WF
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Aug; 87(8):2709-19. PubMed ID: 15328297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genomic evaluation of a relatively small dairy cattle population by combination with a larger population.
    Weller JI; Stoop WM; Eding H; Schrooten C; Ezra E
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jul; 98(7):4945-55. PubMed ID: 25935250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Extent and benefits of multi-country progeny testing of young dairy sires.
    Weigel KA; Zwald NR
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 May; 85(5):1339-44. PubMed ID: 12086072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.