273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20193714)
1. National validation study of a swab protocol for the recovery of Bacillus anthracis spores from surfaces.
Hodges LR; Rose LJ; O'Connell H; Arduino MJ
J Microbiol Methods; 2010 May; 81(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 20193714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Most-probable-number rapid viability PCR method to detect viable spores of Bacillus anthracis in swab samples.
Létant SE; Kane SR; Murphy GA; Alfaro TM; Hodges LR; Rose LJ; Raber E
J Microbiol Methods; 2010 May; 81(2):200-2. PubMed ID: 20193716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of a macrofoam swab protocol for the recovery of Bacillus anthracis spores from a steel surface.
Hodges LR; Rose LJ; Peterson A; Noble-Wang J; Arduino MJ
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2006 Jun; 72(6):4429-30. PubMed ID: 16751562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. National validation study of a cellulose sponge wipe-processing method for use after sampling Bacillus anthracis spores from surfaces.
Rose LJ; Hodges L; O'Connell H; Noble-Wang J
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2011 Dec; 77(23):8355-9. PubMed ID: 21965403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of five commercial nucleic acid extraction kits for their ability to inactivate Bacillus anthracis spores and comparison of DNA yields from spores and spiked environmental samples.
Dauphin LA; Moser BD; Bowen MD
J Microbiol Methods; 2009 Jan; 76(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18824041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rapid, high-throughput, culture-based PCR methods to analyze samples for viable spores of Bacillus anthracis and its surrogates.
Kane SR; Létant SE; Murphy GA; Alfaro TM; Krauter PW; Mahnke R; Legler TC; Raber E
J Microbiol Methods; 2009 Mar; 76(3):278-84. PubMed ID: 19141303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Swab materials and Bacillus anthracis spore recovery from nonporous surfaces.
Rose L; Jensen B; Peterson A; Banerjee SN; Srduino MJ
Emerg Infect Dis; 2004 Jun; 10(6):1023-9. PubMed ID: 15207053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of false-negative rates and limits of detection following macrofoam-swab sampling of Bacillus anthracis surrogates via Rapid Viability PCR and plate culture.
Hutchison JR; Piepel GF; Amidan BG; Hess BM; Sydor MA; Deatherage Kaiser BL
J Appl Microbiol; 2018 May; 124(5):1092-1106. PubMed ID: 29356220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. False-negative rate, limit of detection and recovery efficiency performance of a validated macrofoam-swab sampling method for low surface concentrations of Bacillus anthracis Sterne and Bacillus atrophaeus spores.
Piepel GF; Deatherage Kaiser BL; Amidan BG; Sydor MA; Barrett CA; Hutchison JR
J Appl Microbiol; 2016 Jul; 121(1):149-62. PubMed ID: 26972788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of Bacillus anthracis and Yersinia pestis sample collection from nonporous surfaces by quantitative real-time PCR.
Hong-Geller E; Valdez YE; Shou Y; Yoshida TM; Marrone BL; Dunbar JM
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2010 Apr; 50(4):431-7. PubMed ID: 20184669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A simple method for the rapid removal of Bacillus anthracis spores from DNA preparations.
Dauphin LA; Bowen MD
J Microbiol Methods; 2009 Feb; 76(2):212-4. PubMed ID: 18996156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Filtration methods for recovery of Bacillus anthracis spores spiked into source and finished water.
Perez A; Hohn C; Higgins J
Water Res; 2005 Dec; 39(20):5199-211. PubMed ID: 16290183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rapid sporulation of Bacillus anthracis in a high iron, glucose-free medium.
Purohit M; Sassi-Gaha S; Rest RF
J Microbiol Methods; 2010 Sep; 82(3):282-7. PubMed ID: 20621133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Piezoelectric-excited millimeter-sized cantilever (PEMC) sensors detect Bacillus anthracis at 300 spores/mL.
Campbell GA; Mutharasan R
Biosens Bioelectron; 2006 Mar; 21(9):1684-92. PubMed ID: 16169715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the Cepheid GeneXpert system for detecting Bacillus anthracis.
Ulrich MP; Christensen DR; Coyne SR; Craw PD; Henchal EA; Sakai SH; Swenson D; Tholath J; Tsai J; Weir AF; Norwood DA
J Appl Microbiol; 2006 May; 100(5):1011-6. PubMed ID: 16630001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of onsite technologies for rapidly assessing environmental Bacillus anthracis contamination on surfaces in buildings.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2001 Dec; 50(48):1087. PubMed ID: 11770505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of spores of Bacillus anthracis from environment using polymerase chain reaction.
Alam SI; Agarwal GS; Kamboj DV; Rai GP; Singh L
Indian J Exp Biol; 2003 Feb; 41(2):177-80. PubMed ID: 15255613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Double-color fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for the detection of Bacillus anthracis spores in environmental samples with a novel permeabilization protocol.
Weerasekara ML; Ryuda N; Miyamoto H; Okumura T; Ueno D; Inoue K; Someya T
J Microbiol Methods; 2013 Jun; 93(3):177-84. PubMed ID: 23523967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Problems associated with traditional hygiene swabbing: the need for in-house standardization.
Moore G; Griffith C
J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Oct; 103(4):1090-103. PubMed ID: 17897214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of tools for environmental sampling of Bacillus anthracis spores.
Fujinami Y; Hosokawa-Muto J; Mizuno N
Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Dec; 257():376-378. PubMed ID: 26528669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]