BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

502 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20193921)

  • 1. Responding to an accusation of malpractice.
    Gunderman RB
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2010 Mar; 7(3):177-9. PubMed ID: 20193921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiologic errors and malpractice: a blurry distinction.
    Berlin L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Sep; 189(3):517-22. PubMed ID: 17715094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Health courts.
    Kopen DF
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 2006 Aug; 91(8):48. PubMed ID: 18557074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When familiar is different.
    Bogardus C
    Adm Radiol; 1993 Mar; 12(3):20-1. PubMed ID: 10125122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Physicians' cognitive errors and their liability consequences.
    Bartlett EE
    J Healthc Risk Manag; 1998; 18(4):62-9. PubMed ID: 10537844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Empirical evidence and malpractice litigation.
    Peters PG
    Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 2004 Nov; (307):9-29. PubMed ID: 15649006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The physician and the malpractice accusation].
    Pribilla O
    Beitr Gerichtl Med; 1988; 46():27-36. PubMed ID: 3178671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Status and function of the anesthesiologic expert witness in the malpractice process].
    Ulsenheimer K
    Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 1995 Feb; 30(1):55-60; discussion 60-5. PubMed ID: 7888524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Medical malpractice and tort reform.
    ; Berry MD
    Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2014 Dec; ():1-40. PubMed ID: 25775714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 'Malpractice nightmare' doesn't ring true.
    Eisberg JF
    Minn Med; 1994 Jan; 77(1):3. PubMed ID: 8127305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Expert testimony in malpractice suits].
    Deutsch E
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1995 Nov; 89(6):581-4. PubMed ID: 8588427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiology Malpractice Claims in the United States From 2008 to 2012: Characteristics and Implications.
    Harvey HB; Tomov E; Babayan A; Dwyer K; Boland S; Pandharipande PV; Halpern EF; Alkasab TK; Hirsch JA; Schaefer PW; Boland GW; Choy G
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Feb; 13(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 26454772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The court expert and his opinion in legal proceedings].
    Szmidt W
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2007; 57(2):193-5. PubMed ID: 17691174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Medical malpractice from the physician's viewpoint].
    Carstensen G
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1995 Nov; 89(6):570-5. PubMed ID: 8588425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Pitfalls of Rendering an Expert Opinion in Breast Malpractice Cases by Reviewing a CD-ROM.
    Brenner RJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Apr; 13(4):424-5. PubMed ID: 26768543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can a radiologist be compelled to testify as an expert witness?
    Berlin L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jul; 185(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 15972395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What we need to do to really reform health care.
    Tone TR
    Minn Med; 2010 Dec; 93(12):31-2. PubMed ID: 21265416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The expert witness: understanding the rationale.
    Brenner RJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Sep; 4(9):612-6. PubMed ID: 17845966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The surgeon as the expert in the legal liability process].
    Franzki H
    Chirurg; 1991 Jan; 62(1):suppl 5-11. PubMed ID: 2026059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Medical tort falls short in court.
    Jones JW; McCullough LB
    J Vasc Surg; 2007 Dec; 46(6):1303-5. PubMed ID: 18155010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.