These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
472 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20193924)
1. Analysis of appropriateness of outpatient CT and MRI referred from primary care clinics at an academic medical center: how critical is the need for improved decision support? Lehnert BE; Bree RL J Am Coll Radiol; 2010 Mar; 7(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 20193924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preauthorization of CT and MRI examinations: assessment of a managed care preauthorization program based on the ACR Appropriateness Criteria and the Royal College of Radiology guidelines. Blachar A; Tal S; Mandel A; Novikov I; Polliack G; Sosna J; Freedman Y; Copel L; Shemer J J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Nov; 3(11):851-9. PubMed ID: 17412184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Experience of an academic neuroradiology division participating in a utilization management program. Friedman DP; Smith NS; Bree RL; Rao VM J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Feb; 6(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 19179241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of provider-led, technology-enabled radiology management program on imaging. Ip IK; Schneider L; Seltzer S; Smith A; Dudley J; Menard A; Khorasani R Am J Med; 2013 Aug; 126(8):687-92. PubMed ID: 23786668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can guidelines impact the ordering of magnetic resonance imaging studies by primary care providers for low back pain? Rao JK; Kroenke K; Mihaliak KA; Eckert GJ; Weinberger M Am J Manag Care; 2002 Jan; 8(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 11814170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Temporal trends in compliance with appropriateness criteria for stress single-photon emission computed tomography sestamibi studies in an academic medical center. Gibbons RJ; Askew JW; Hodge D; Miller TD Am Heart J; 2010 Mar; 159(3):484-9. PubMed ID: 20211313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost of care for ambulatory patients with low back pain. Liu AC; Byrne E J Fam Pract; 1995 May; 40(5):449-55. PubMed ID: 7730768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of electronic decision support on high-tech diagnostic imaging orders and patients. Solberg LI; Wei F; Butler JC; Palattao KJ; Vinz CA; Marshall MA Am J Manag Care; 2010 Feb; 16(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 20148614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Information system support as a critical success factor for chronic disease management: Necessary but not sufficient. Green CJ; Fortin P; Maclure M; Macgregor A; Robinson S Int J Med Inform; 2006 Dec; 75(12):818-28. PubMed ID: 16920013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Quality control of outpatient imaging examinations in North Rhine-Westphalia, Part II]. Krug B; Boettge M; Reineke T; Coburger S; Zähringer M; Harnischmacher U; Lüngen M; Lauterbach KW; Lehmacher W; Lackner K Rofo; 2003 Mar; 175(3):346-60. PubMed ID: 12635011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Appropriateness of colonoscopy using the ASGE guidelines: experience in a large Asian hospital. Chan TH; Goh KL Chin J Dig Dis; 2006; 7(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 16412034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Primary care guidelines on consultation practices: the effectiveness of computerized versus paper-based versions. A cluster randomized controlled trial among newly qualified primary care physicians. Jousimaa J; Mäkelä M; Kunnamo I; MacLennan G; Grimshaw JM Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2002; 18(3):586-96. PubMed ID: 12391951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nonradiologist utilization of American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria in a preauthorization center for MRI requests: applicability and effects. Levy G; Blachar A; Goldstein L; Paz I; Olsha S; Atar E; Goldberg A; Bar Dayan Y AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Oct; 187(4):855-8. PubMed ID: 16985125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reduction in the number and associated costs of unindicated dual-phase head CT examinations after a quality improvement initiative. Strother MK; Robert EC; Cobb JG; Pruthi S; Feurer ID AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Nov; 201(5):1049-56. PubMed ID: 24147476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical outcomes of magnetic resonance imaging in blunt cervical trauma. Labattaglia MP; Cameron PA; Santamaria M; Varma D; Thomson K; Bailey M; Kossmann T Emerg Med Australas; 2007 Jun; 19(3):253-61. PubMed ID: 17564694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. General practitioners' use of magnetic resonance imaging: an open randomized trial comparing telephone and written requests and an open randomized controlled trial of different methods of local guideline dissemination. Robling MR; Houston HL; Kinnersley P; Hourihan MD; Cohen DR; Hale J; Hood K Clin Radiol; 2002 May; 57(5):402-7. PubMed ID: 12014939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Magnetic resonance imaging is not needed to clear cervical spines in blunt trauma patients with normal computed tomographic results and no motor deficits. Schuster R; Waxman K; Sanchez B; Becerra S; Chung R; Conner S; Jones T Arch Surg; 2005 Aug; 140(8):762-6. PubMed ID: 16103286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can ophthalmic requests for neuroimaging be improved? Mathews JP; Mathews D; Walker S; Tuck J; Kelly SP Eye (Lond); 2004 Mar; 18(3):290-2. PubMed ID: 15004579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Applicability of American College of Radiology appropriateness criteria in a general internal medicine clinic. Martin TA; Quiroz FA; Rand SD; Kahn CE AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Jul; 173(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 10397090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]