BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1551 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20194334)

  • 1. Outcomes of single-row and double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a systematic review.
    Saridakis P; Jones G
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Mar; 92(3):732-42. PubMed ID: 20194334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the clinical outcomes of single- and double-row repairs in rotator cuff tears.
    Park JY; Lhee SH; Choi JH; Park HK; Yu JW; Seo JB
    Am J Sports Med; 2008 Jul; 36(7):1310-6. PubMed ID: 18413680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Outcomes of single-row versus double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence.
    Chen M; Xu W; Dong Q; Huang Q; Xie Z; Mao Y
    Arthroscopy; 2013 Aug; 29(8):1437-49. PubMed ID: 23711754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Arthroscopic single-row versus double-row technique for repairing rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ying ZM; Lin T; Yan SG
    Orthop Surg; 2014 Nov; 6(4):300-12. PubMed ID: 25430714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Massive tears of rotator cuff - comparison of mini-open and arthroscopic techniques. Part 1. Mini-open technique].
    Musil D; Sadovský P; Stehlík J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2006 Dec; 73(6):387-93. PubMed ID: 17266840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does double-row rotator cuff repair improve functional outcome of patients compared with single-row technique? A systematic review.
    DeHaan AM; Axelrad TW; Kaye E; Silvestri L; Puskas B; Foster TE
    Am J Sports Med; 2012 May; 40(5):1176-85. PubMed ID: 22156169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical and structural outcomes after arthroscopic single-row versus double-row rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of level I randomized clinical trials.
    Millett PJ; Warth RJ; Dornan GJ; Lee JT; Spiegl UJ
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2014 Apr; 23(4):586-97. PubMed ID: 24411671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical and structural outcomes after arthroscopic repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears with and without platelet-rich product supplementation: a meta-analysis and meta-regression.
    Warth RJ; Dornan GJ; James EW; Horan MP; Millett PJ
    Arthroscopy; 2015 Feb; 31(2):306-20. PubMed ID: 25450417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical Outcomes of Modified Mason-Allen Single-Row Repair for Bursal-Sided Partial-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears: Comparison With the Double-Row Suture-Bridge Technique.
    Shin SJ; Kook SH; Rao N; Seo MJ
    Am J Sports Med; 2015 Aug; 43(8):1976-82. PubMed ID: 26055919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does the literature support double-row suture anchor fixation for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair? A systematic review comparing double-row and single-row suture anchor configuration.
    Nho SJ; Slabaugh MA; Seroyer ST; Grumet RC; Wilson JB; Verma NN; Romeo AA; Bach BR
    Arthroscopy; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1319-28. PubMed ID: 19896055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does the Use of Platelet-Rich Plasma at the Time of Surgery Improve Clinical Outcomes in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair When Compared With Control Cohorts? A Systematic Review of Meta-analyses.
    Saltzman BM; Jain A; Campbell KA; Mascarenhas R; Romeo AA; Verma NN; Cole BJ
    Arthroscopy; 2016 May; 32(5):906-18. PubMed ID: 26725454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Repair integrity and functional outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: double-row versus suture-bridge technique.
    Kim KC; Shin HD; Lee WY; Han SC
    Am J Sports Med; 2012 Feb; 40(2):294-9. PubMed ID: 22074913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Functional and structural outcome after arthroscopic full-thickness rotator cuff repair: single-row versus dual-row fixation.
    Sugaya H; Maeda K; Matsuki K; Moriishi J
    Arthroscopy; 2005 Nov; 21(11):1307-16. PubMed ID: 16325080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Arthroscopic Single-Row Versus Double-Row Suture Bridge Technique for Rotator Cuff Tears in Patients Younger Than 55 Years: A Prospective Comparative Study.
    Hantes ME; Ono Y; Raoulis VA; Doxariotis N; Venouziou A; Zibis A; Vlychou M
    Am J Sports Med; 2018 Jan; 46(1):116-121. PubMed ID: 28942685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Arthroscopic Single-row and Double-row Repair for Rotator Cuff Injuries With Different Tear Sizes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Gu Z; Wu S; Yang Y; Ren T; Zhang KW
    Orthop J Sports Med; 2023 Aug; 11(8):23259671231180854. PubMed ID: 37655249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing single-row with double-row fixation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
    Lapner PL; Sabri E; Rakhra K; McRae S; Leiter J; Bell K; Macdonald P
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jul; 94(14):1249-57. PubMed ID: 22810395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors affecting healing rates after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair.
    Tashjian RZ; Hollins AM; Kim HM; Teefey SA; Middleton WD; Steger-May K; Galatz LM; Yamaguchi K
    Am J Sports Med; 2010 Dec; 38(12):2435-42. PubMed ID: 21030564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Clinical Effect of a Rotator Cuff Retear: A Meta-analysis of Arthroscopic Single-Row and Double-Row Repairs.
    Yang J; Robbins M; Reilly J; Maerz T; Anderson K
    Am J Sports Med; 2017 Mar; 45(3):733-741. PubMed ID: 27416991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Incidence of retear with double-row versus single-row rotator cuff repair.
    Shen C; Tang ZH; Hu JZ; Zou GY; Xiao RC
    Orthopedics; 2014 Nov; 37(11):e1006-13. PubMed ID: 25361362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Single-versus double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in massive tears.
    Wang E; Wang L; Gao P; Li Z; Zhou X; Wang S
    Med Sci Monit; 2015 May; 21():1556-61. PubMed ID: 26017641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 78.