These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2019506)

  • 1. RBE vs. dose for low doses of high-let radiations.
    Katz R; Cucinotta FA
    Health Phys; 1991 May; 60(5):717-8. PubMed ID: 2019506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biological effects of heavy ions from the standpoint of target theory.
    Katz R
    Adv Space Res; 1986; 6(11):191-8. PubMed ID: 11537221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is the dose-averaged LET a reliable predictor for the relative biological effectiveness?
    Grün R; Friedrich T; Traneus E; Scholz M
    Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):1064-1074. PubMed ID: 30565705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relative biological effectiveness of low- and high-LET radiotherapy beams for jejunal crypt cell survival at low doses per fraction.
    Fu KK; Phillips TL; Heilbron DC; Ross G; Kane LJ
    Radiology; 1979 Jul; 132(1):205-9. PubMed ID: 109900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relative biological effectiveness of 6 MeV neutrons with respect to cell inactivation and disturbances of the G1 phase.
    Zölzer F; Streffer C
    Radiat Res; 2008 Feb; 169(2):207-13. PubMed ID: 18220459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interaction between the biological effects of high- and low-LET radiation dose components in a mixed field exposure.
    Mason AJ; Giusti V; Green S; Munck af Rosenschöld P; Beynon TD; Hopewell JW
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2011 Dec; 87(12):1162-72. PubMed ID: 21923301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High LET constraints on low LET survival.
    Katz R
    Phys Med Biol; 1978 Sep; 23(5):909-16. PubMed ID: 715006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differences between biological effects of high LET and low LET radiations in relation to their application in radiotherapy.
    Barendsen GW
    Radiol Clin (Basel); 1977; 46(5):380-9. PubMed ID: 601222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiobiology with heavy charged particles: a historical review.
    Skarsgard LD
    Phys Med; 1998 Jul; 14 Suppl 1():1-19. PubMed ID: 11542635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exploration of "over kill effect" of high-LET Ar- and Fe-ions by evaluating the fraction of non-hit cell and interphase death.
    Mehnati P; Morimoto S; Yatagai F; Furusawa Y; Kobayashi Y; Wada S; Kanai T; Hanaoka F; Sasaki H
    J Radiat Res; 2005 Sep; 46(3):343-50. PubMed ID: 16210791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanisms for the biological effectiveness of high-LET radiations.
    Goodhead DT
    J Radiat Res; 1999 Dec; 40 Suppl():1-13. PubMed ID: 10804988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. RBE for non-stochastic effects.
    Barendsen GW
    Adv Space Res; 1992; 12(2-3):385-92. PubMed ID: 11537035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inactivation and mutation of cultured mammalian cells by aluminium characteristic ultrasoft X-rays. II. Dose-responses of Chinese hamster and human diploid cells to aluminium X-rays and radiations of different LET.
    Cox R; Thacker J; Goodhead DT
    Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med; 1977 Jun; 31(6):561-76. PubMed ID: 301865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimation of radiation tolerance to high LET heavy ions in an anhydrobiotic insect, Polypedilum vanderplanki.
    Watanabe M; Sakashita T; Fujita A; Kikawada T; Nakahara Y; Hamada N; Horikawa DD; Wada S; Funayama T; Kobayashi Y; Okuda T
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2006 Dec; 82(12):835-42. PubMed ID: 17178623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relative biological effectiveness of high linear energy transfer α-particles for the induction of DNA-double-strand breaks, chromosome aberrations and reproductive cell death in SW-1573 lung tumour cells.
    Franken NA; Hovingh S; Ten Cate R; Krawczyk P; Stap J; Hoebe R; Aten J; Barendsen GW
    Oncol Rep; 2012 Mar; 27(3):769-74. PubMed ID: 22200791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Induction and disappearance of G2 chromatid breaks in lymphocytes after low doses of low-LET gamma-rays and high-LET fast neutrons.
    Vral A; Thierens H; Baeyens A; De Ridder L
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2002 Apr; 78(4):249-57. PubMed ID: 12020436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High-LET radiation carcinogenesis.
    Fry RJ; Powers-Risius P; Alpen EL; Ainsworth EJ
    Radiat Res Suppl; 1985; 8():S188-95. PubMed ID: 3867083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Scaling Human Cancer Risks from Low LET to High LET when Dose-Effect Relationships are Complex.
    Shuryak I; Fornace AJ; Datta K; Suman S; Kumar S; Sachs RK; Brenner DJ
    Radiat Res; 2017 Apr; 187(4):476-482. PubMed ID: 28218889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Constancy of the relative biological effectiveness of 42 MeV (p-->Be+) neutrons among cell lines with different DNA repair proficiencies.
    Britten RA; Murray D
    Radiat Res; 1997 Oct; 148(4):308-16. PubMed ID: 9339946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The relationships between RBE and LET for different types of lethal damage in mammalian cells: biophysical and molecular mechanisms.
    Barendsen GW
    Radiat Res; 1994 Sep; 139(3):257-70. PubMed ID: 8073108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.