These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20195848)

  • 1. Planning and control of hand orientation in grasping movements.
    Herbort O; Butz MV
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 May; 202(4):867-78. PubMed ID: 20195848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Too much anticipation? Large anticipatory adjustments of grasping movements to minimal object manipulations.
    Herbort O
    Hum Mov Sci; 2015 Aug; 42():100-16. PubMed ID: 26004123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The contribution of cognitive, kinematic, and dynamic factors to anticipatory grasp selection.
    Herbort O; Butz MV; Kunde W
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Jun; 232(6):1677-88. PubMed ID: 24534913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Grasp planning for object manipulation without simulation of the object manipulation action.
    Herbort O; Kirsch W; Kunde W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Feb; 45(2):237-254. PubMed ID: 30589359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An investigation into manual asymmetries in grasp behavior and kinematics during an object manipulation task.
    Seegelke C; Hughes CM; Schack T
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Nov; 215(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 21938544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inverting the planning gradient: adjustment of grasps to late segments of multi-step object manipulations.
    Mathew H; Kunde W; Herbort O
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 May; 235(5):1397-1409. PubMed ID: 28233050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Individual differences in motor planning during a multi-segment object manipulation task.
    Seegelke C; Hughes CM; Schütz C; Schack T
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Oct; 222(1-2):125-36. PubMed ID: 22885998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Manual asymmetries in grasp pre-shaping and transport-grasp coordination.
    Tretriluxana J; Gordon J; Winstein CJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 188(2):305-15. PubMed ID: 18437369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Context-specific grasp movement representation in the macaque anterior intraparietal area.
    Baumann MA; Fluet MC; Scherberger H
    J Neurosci; 2009 May; 29(20):6436-48. PubMed ID: 19458215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of grasping habits and object orientation on motor planning in children and adults.
    Jovanovic B; Schwarzer G
    Dev Psychobiol; 2017 Dec; 59(8):949-957. PubMed ID: 29071707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The continuous end-state comfort effect: weighted integration of multiple biases.
    Herbort O; Butz MV
    Psychol Res; 2012 May; 76(3):345-63. PubMed ID: 21499901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A kinematic analysis of age-related changes in grasping to use and grasping to move common objects.
    Cicerale A; Ambron E; Lingnau A; Rumiati RI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Sep; 151():134-42. PubMed ID: 24977936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective and retrospective effects in human motor control: planning grasps for object rotation and translation.
    Cohen RG; Rosenbaum DA
    Psychol Res; 2011 Jul; 75(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20941504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Problems in planning bimanually incongruent grasp postures relate to simultaneous response specification processes.
    Hughes CM; Seegelke C; Reissig P
    Brain Cogn; 2014 Jun; 87():22-9. PubMed ID: 24650762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Second-order grasp planning reflects sensitivity to inertial factors.
    Wagman JB; Abney DH; Rosenbaum DA
    Hum Mov Sci; 2018 Feb; 57():451-460. PubMed ID: 29074308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Integrated control of hand transport and orientation during prehension movements.
    Desmurget M; Prablanc C; Arzi M; Rossetti Y; Paulignan Y; Urquizar C
    Exp Brain Res; 1996 Jul; 110(2):265-78. PubMed ID: 8836690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of obstacles on grasp planning.
    Garzorz IT; Knorr AG; Gilster R; Deubel H
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Oct; 236(10):2639-2648. PubMed ID: 29974146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Control of hand orientation and arm movement during reach and grasp.
    Fan J; He J; Tillery SI
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 May; 171(3):283-96. PubMed ID: 16307238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anticipatory gaze strategies when grasping moving objects.
    Bulloch MC; Prime SL; Marotta JJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Dec; 233(12):3413-23. PubMed ID: 26289482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Palmar arch dynamics during reach-to-grasp tasks.
    Sangole AP; Levin MF
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Oct; 190(4):443-52. PubMed ID: 18641977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.