BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20196066)

  • 1. Incorporation of femur length leads to underestimation of fetal weight in asymmetric preterm growth restriction.
    Proctor LK; Rushworth V; Shah PS; Keunen J; Windrim R; Ryan G; Kingdom J
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Apr; 35(4):442-8. PubMed ID: 20196066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fetal Medicine Foundation fetal and neonatal population weight charts.
    Nicolaides KH; Wright D; Syngelaki A; Wright A; Akolekar R
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 52(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 29696704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight: development of new model and assessment of performance of previous models.
    Hammami A; Mazer Zumaeta A; Syngelaki A; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 52(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 29611251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fetal growth restriction and intra-uterine growth restriction: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.
    Vayssière C; Sentilhes L; Ego A; Bernard C; Cambourieu D; Flamant C; Gascoin G; Gaudineau A; Grangé G; Houfflin-Debarge V; Langer B; Malan V; Marcorelles P; Nizard J; Perrotin F; Salomon L; Senat MV; Serry A; Tessier V; Truffert P; Tsatsaris V; Arnaud C; Carbonne B
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Oct; 193():10-8. PubMed ID: 26207980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. International estimated fetal weight standards of the INTERGROWTH-21
    Stirnemann J; Villar J; Salomon LJ; Ohuma E; Ruyan P; Altman DG; Nosten F; Craik R; Munim S; Cheikh Ismail L; Barros FC; Lambert A; Norris S; Carvalho M; Jaffer YA; Noble JA; Bertino E; Gravett MG; Purwar M; Victora CG; Uauy R; Bhutta Z; Kennedy S; Papageorghiou AT; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Apr; 49(4):478-486. PubMed ID: 27804212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prediction of birthweight by fetal ultrasound biometry.
    Nzeh DA; Rimmer S; Moore WM; Hunt L
    Br J Radiol; 1992 Nov; 65(779):987-9. PubMed ID: 1450836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicting birth weight in fetuses with gastroschisis.
    Zaki MN; Lusk LA; Overcash RT; Rao R; Truong YN; Liebowitz M; Porto M
    J Perinatol; 2018 Feb; 38(2):122-126. PubMed ID: 29266095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of biometric measurement error on identification of small- and large-for-gestational-age fetuses.
    Wright D; Wright A; Smith E; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 55(2):170-176. PubMed ID: 31682299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Routine ultrasound at 32 vs 36 weeks' gestation: prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates.
    Ciobanu A; Khan N; Syngelaki A; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jun; 53(6):761-768. PubMed ID: 30883981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Discordance in fetal biometry and Doppler are independent predictors of the risk of perinatal loss in twin pregnancies.
    Khalil AA; Khan N; Bowe S; Familiari A; Papageorghiou A; Bhide A; Thilaganathan B
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Aug; 213(2):222.e1-222.e10. PubMed ID: 25731693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fetal cardiac function in late-onset intrauterine growth restriction vs small-for-gestational age, as defined by estimated fetal weight, cerebroplacental ratio and uterine artery Doppler.
    Pérez-Cruz M; Cruz-Lemini M; Fernández MT; Parra JA; Bartrons J; Gómez-Roig MD; Crispi F; Gratacós E
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 46(4):465-71. PubMed ID: 26112274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating the accuracy and precision of sonographic fetal weight estimation models in extremely early-onset fetal growth restriction.
    Warrander LK; Ingram E; Heazell AEP; Johnstone ED
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Mar; 99(3):364-373. PubMed ID: 31596942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Construction of fetal charts for biparietal diameter, fetal abdominal circumference and femur length in Bangladeshi population.
    Ashrafunnessa ; Jehan AH; Chowdhury SB; Sultana F; Haque JA; Khatun S; Karim MA
    Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull; 2003 Aug; 29(2):67-77. PubMed ID: 14674622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ultrasonographic measurement of thymus size in IUGR fetuses: a marker of the fetal immunoendocrine response to malnutrition.
    Cromi A; Ghezzi F; Raffaelli R; Bergamini V; Siesto G; Bolis P
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Apr; 33(4):421-6. PubMed ID: 19306477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimal risk assessment of small-for-gestational-age fetuses using 31-34-week biometry in a low-risk population.
    Stirnemann JJ; Benoist G; Salomon LJ; Bernard JP; Ville Y
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Mar; 43(3):311-6. PubMed ID: 24357451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of fetal and parental factors on intrauterine growth measurements: results of the EDEN mother-child cohort.
    Albouy-Llaty M; Thiebaugeorges O; Goua V; Magnin G; Schweitzer M; Forhan A; Lelong N; Slama R; Charles MA; Kaminski M;
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Dec; 38(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 21438052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Incorporating sonographic cheek-to-cheek diameter, biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference improves weight estimation in the macrosomic fetus.
    Abramowicz JS; Robischon K; Cox C
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 9(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 9239827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimation of fetal weight in fetuses with abdominal wall defects: comparison of 2 recent sonographic formulas to the Hadlock formula.
    Nicholas S; Tuuli MG; Dicke J; Macones GA; Stamilio D; Odibo AO
    J Ultrasound Med; 2010 Jul; 29(7):1069-74. PubMed ID: 20587430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by fetal biometry at 35-37 weeks.
    Fadigas C; Saiid Y; Gonzalez R; Poon LC; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 45(5):559-65. PubMed ID: 25728139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fetal transabdominal biometry at 11-14 weeks of gestation.
    von Kaisenberg CS; Fritzer E; Kühling H; Jonat W
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Dec; 20(6):564-74. PubMed ID: 12493045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 56.