These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20196293)

  • 1. Psychophysiological responses in women during cart pushing on different frictional walkways.
    Maikala RV; Ciriello VM; Dempsey PG; O'Brien NV
    Hum Factors; 2009 Oct; 51(5):681-93. PubMed ID: 20196293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic pushing on three frictional surfaces: maximum acceptable forces, cardiopulmonary and calf muscle metabolic responses in healthy men.
    Maikala RV; Dempsey PG; Ciriello VM; O'Brien NV
    Ergonomics; 2009 Jun; 52(6):735-46. PubMed ID: 19431004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gender comparison of psychophysical forces, cardiopulmonary, and muscle metabolic responses during a simulated cart pushing task.
    Maikala RV; Ciriello VM; Dempsey PG; O'Brien NV
    Gait Posture; 2010 Oct; 32(4):524-9. PubMed ID: 20864348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Initial force and postural adaptations when pushing and pulling on floor surfaces with good and reduced resistance to slipping.
    Boocock MG; Haslam RA; Lemon P; Thorpe S
    Ergonomics; 2006 Jul; 49(9):801-21. PubMed ID: 16801229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Psychophysically determined horizontal and vertical forces of dynamic pushing on high and low coefficient of friction floors for female industrial workers.
    Ciriello VM
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2005 Mar; 2(3):136-42. PubMed ID: 15764537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Description and analysis of hand forces in medicine cart pushing tasks.
    Boyer J; Lin JH; Chang CC
    Appl Ergon; 2013 Jan; 44(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 22607837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Psychophysically determined forces of dynamic pushing for female industrial workers: Comparison of two apparatuses.
    Ciriello VM; Maikala RV; Dempsey PG; O'Brien NV
    Appl Ergon; 2010 Jan; 41(1):141-5. PubMed ID: 19628201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Psychophysical basis for maximum pushing and pulling forces: A review and recommendations.
    Garg A; Waters T; Kapellusch J; Karwowski W
    Int J Ind Ergon; 2014 Mar; 44(2):281-291. PubMed ID: 26664045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Force direction and physical load in dynamic pushing and pulling.
    de Looze MP; van Greuningen K; Rebel J; Kingma I; Kuijer PP
    Ergonomics; 2000 Mar; 43(3):377-90. PubMed ID: 10755660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors affecting minimum push and pull forces of manual carts.
    Al-Eisawi KW; Kerk CJ; Congleton JJ; Amendola AA; Jenkins OC; Gaines W
    Appl Ergon; 1999 Jun; 30(3):235-45. PubMed ID: 10327087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Association between spinal loads and the psychophysical determination of maximum acceptable force during pushing tasks.
    Le P; Dufour J; Monat H; Rose J; Huber Z; Alder E; Radin Umar RZ; Hennessey B; Dutt M; Marras WS
    Ergonomics; 2012; 55(9):1104-14. PubMed ID: 22676341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of ergonomic adjustments of catering carts to reduce external pushing forces.
    Jansen JP; Hoozemans MJ; van der Beek AJ; Frings-Dresen MH
    Appl Ergon; 2002 Mar; 33(2):117-27. PubMed ID: 12009118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Shoulder joint loading and posture during medicine cart pushing task.
    Xu X; Lin JH; Boyer J
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2013; 10(8):446-54. PubMed ID: 23767931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Handle height and expectation of cart movement affect the control of trunk motion at movement onset in cart pushing.
    Lee YJ; Hoozemans MJ; van Dieën JH
    Ergonomics; 2011 Oct; 54(10):971-82. PubMed ID: 21973008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Maximum acceptable forces of dynamic pushing: comparison of two techniques.
    Ciriello VM; McGorry RW; Martin SE; Bezverkhny IB
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 9973870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Frictional forces required for unrestrained locomotion in dairy cattle.
    van der Tol PP; Metz JH; Noordhuizen-Stassen EN; Back W; Braam CR; Weijs WA
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Feb; 88(2):615-24. PubMed ID: 15653528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceived floor slipperiness and floor roughness in a gait experiment.
    Yu R; Li KW
    Work; 2015; 50(4):649-57. PubMed ID: 24448018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Slip Potential for Commonly Used Inclined Grated Metal Walkways.
    Pollard JP; Heberger JR; Dempsey PG
    IIE Trans Occup; 2015; 3(2):115-126. PubMed ID: 26779388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanics of slips.
    Redfern MS; Cham R; Gielo-Perczak K; Grönqvist R; Hirvonen M; Lanshammar H; Marpet M; Pai CY; Powers C
    Ergonomics; 2001 Oct; 44(13):1138-66. PubMed ID: 11794762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical loading of the shoulder complex and lumbosacral joints during dynamic cart pushing task.
    Nimbarte AD; Sun Y; Jaridi M; Hsiao H
    Appl Ergon; 2013 Sep; 44(5):841-9. PubMed ID: 23566675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.