178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20196417)
21. Three-dimensional computed tomography cephalometric craniofacial analysis: experimental validation in vitro.
Olszewski R; Zech F; Cosnard G; Nicolas V; Macq B; Reychler H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Sep; 36(9):828-33. PubMed ID: 17825530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Correlation coefficients in human skulls: significant sexual differences.
Rude J; Mertzlufft FO
Anthropol Anz; 1987 Dec; 45(4):371-5. PubMed ID: 3435091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Three-dimensional analysis of biplanar cephalograms.
Wu MC; Cheng KS; Chen YT; Liu JK; Ting WH
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Dec; 32(6):627-32. PubMed ID: 20660132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Technical note: comparability of Hrdlička's Catalog of Crania data based on measurement landmark definitions.
Stojanowski CM; Euber JK
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2011 Sep; 146(1):143-9. PubMed ID: 21766286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. 3D CT-based cephalometric analysis: 3D cephalometric theoretical concept and software.
Olszewski R; Cosnard G; Macq B; Mahy P; Reychler H
Neuroradiology; 2006 Nov; 48(11):853-62. PubMed ID: 17009024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.
Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Measurement accuracy of a computer-assisted three-dimensional analysis and a conventional two-dimensional method.
Olmez H; Gorgulu S; Akin E; Bengi AO; Tekdemir I; Ors F
Angle Orthod; 2011 May; 81(3):375-82. PubMed ID: 21261485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A pilot study on assessment of racial affinity of Sri Lankan population using discriminant function statistics and a few established morphological racial traits.
Perera P; Pathmeswaran A
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2009 Apr; 11 Suppl 1():S182-5. PubMed ID: 19261526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Accuracy of standard craniometric measurements using multiple data formats.
Richard AH; Parks CL; Monson KL
Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Sep; 242():177-185. PubMed ID: 25058451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Improving sex estimation from crania using a novel three-dimensional quantitative method.
Abdel Fatah EE; Shirley NR; Jantz RL; Mahfouz MR
J Forensic Sci; 2014 May; 59(3):590-600. PubMed ID: 24502609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional cephalometry on frontal radiographs and on cone beam computed tomography scans of human skulls.
van Vlijmen OJ; Maal TJ; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 19583759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessment of craniometric traits in South Indian dry skulls for sex determination.
Ramamoorthy B; Pai MM; Prabhu LV; Muralimanju BV; Rai R
J Forensic Leg Med; 2016 Jan; 37():8-14. PubMed ID: 26519924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Three-dimensional fetal cephalometry: an evaluation of the reliability of cephalometric measurements based on three-dimensional CT reconstructions and on dry skulls of sheep fetuses.
Papadopoulos MA; Jannowitz C; Boettcher P; Henke J; Stolla R; Zeilhofer HF; Kovacs L; Erhardt W; Biemer E; Papadopulos NA
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2005 Aug; 33(4):229-37. PubMed ID: 15978824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Three-Dimensional Prediction of the Nose for Facial Approximation in a Thai Population.
Thitiorul S; Mahakkanukrauh P; Prasitwattanaseree S; Sitthiseripratip K; Iamaroon A; Na Lampang S; Prapayasatok S
J Forensic Sci; 2020 May; 65(3):707-714. PubMed ID: 31825537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A study of cranio-facial indices in Uttar Pradesh crania.
Jeyasingh P; Agarwal AK; Gupta SC; Arora AK; Gupta CD
Anat Anz; 1988; 165(5):345-9. PubMed ID: 3421475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Characterization of cranial growth patterns using craniometric parameters and best-fit logarithmic growth curves.
Jeon S; Chung JH; Baek SH; Yang IH; Choi KY; Seo HJ; Shin JY; Kim BJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2024 Jan; 52(1):30-39. PubMed ID: 38135648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Precision and accuracy of low-dose CT protocols in the evaluation of skull landmarks.
Connor SE; Arscott T; Berry J; Greene L; O'Gorman R
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jul; 36(5):270-6. PubMed ID: 17586853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of craniometric measurements of New Zealand rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus L.) using three-dimensional scanner with digital calliper measurements: A methodological study.
Koçyiğit A; Demircioğlu İ
Anat Histol Embryol; 2024 Mar; 53(2):e13023. PubMed ID: 38372086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessment of linear and angular measurements on three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomographic images.
Moreira CR; Sales MA; Lopes PM; Cavalcanti MG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Sep; 108(3):430-6. PubMed ID: 19386521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A new method for improved standardisation in three-dimensional computed tomography cephalometry.
Van Cauter S; Okkerse W; Brijs G; De Beule M; Braem M; Verhegghe B
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2010 Feb; 13(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 19657798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
