These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20196417)

  • 41. Comparison between traditional 2-dimensional cephalometry and a 3-dimensional approach on human dry skulls.
    Adams GL; Gansky SA; Miller AJ; Harrell WE; Hatcher DC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Oct; 126(4):397-409. PubMed ID: 15470343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Linear accuracy of cone beam CT derived 3D images.
    Brown AA; Scarfe WC; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Jan; 79(1):150-7. PubMed ID: 19123719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography.
    Moshiri M; Scarfe WC; Hilgers ML; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):550-60. PubMed ID: 17920510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Sex determination using mastoid process measurement in Thais.
    Manoonpol C; Plakornkul V
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 Mar; 95(3):423-9. PubMed ID: 22550843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Skull indices in a population collected from computed tomographic scans of patients with head trauma.
    Eskandary H; Nematollahi-mahani SN; Zangiabadi N
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 20(2):545-50. PubMed ID: 19305252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A comparison of frontal radiographs obtained from cone beam CT scans and conventional frontal radiographs of human skulls.
    van Vlijmen OJ; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Swennen GR; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 38(7):773-8. PubMed ID: 19369033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A comparison between 2D and 3D cephalometry on CBCT scans of human skulls.
    van Vlijmen OJ; Maal T; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Feb; 39(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 20044238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A new technique for the creation of a computerized composite skull model.
    Gateno J; Xia J; Teichgraeber JF; Rosen A
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Feb; 61(2):222-7. PubMed ID: 12619001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Radiological examination of the skull of Siirt-coloured mohair goat, Romanov and Hamdani sheep.
    Güzel BC; Işbilir F
    Anat Histol Embryol; 2023 Nov; 52(6):967-974. PubMed ID: 37615352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Three-dimensional cranial surface reconstructions using high-resolution computed tomography.
    Vannier MW; Conroy GC; Marsh JL; Knapp RH
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1985 Aug; 67(4):299-311. PubMed ID: 4061585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Craniometric variation and ancestry estimation in two contemporary Caribbean populations.
    Herrera MD; Tallman SD
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Dec; 305():110013. PubMed ID: 31710881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Craniometric studies on the functional morphology of the atlanto-occipital joint in man. Part II. Data and correlations].
    bernhard W
    Gegenbaurs Morphol Jahrb; 1976; 122(4):497-534. PubMed ID: 1010282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Reproducibility of osseous landmarks used for computed tomography based three-dimensional cephalometric analyses.
    Olszewski R; Tanesy O; Cosnard G; Zech F; Reychler H
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Apr; 38(3):214-21. PubMed ID: 19574058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom).
    Lascala CA; Panella J; Marques MM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):291-4. PubMed ID: 15585804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Cranial sutures and craniometric points detected on MRI.
    Cotton F; Rozzi FR; Vallee B; Pachai C; Hermier M; Guihard-Costa AM; Froment JC
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2005 Mar; 27(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 15517262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A study of cranial variations based on craniometric indices in a South Indian population.
    Kanchan T; Krishan K; Gupta A; Acharya J
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 25(5):1645-9. PubMed ID: 25162547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Variation in the measurement of cranial volume and surface area using 3D laser scanning technology.
    Sholts SB; Wärmländer SK; Flores LM; Miller KW; Walker PL
    J Forensic Sci; 2010 Jul; 55(4):871-6. PubMed ID: 20384925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Three-dimensional computer-assisted craniometrics: a comparison of the uncertainty in measurement induced by surface reconstruction performed by two computer programs.
    Guyomarc'h P; Santos F; Dutailly B; Desbarats P; Bou C; Coqueugniot H
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Jun; 219(1-3):221-7. PubMed ID: 22297143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The craniofacial phenotype of the Crouzon mouse: analysis of a model for syndromic craniosynostosis using three-dimensional MicroCT.
    Perlyn CA; DeLeon VB; Babbs C; Govier D; Burell L; Darvann T; Kreiborg S; Morriss-Kay G
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2006 Nov; 43(6):740-8. PubMed ID: 17105336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Craniometric aspects in forensic medical identification of the Kazakhstan population].
    Mussabekova SA; Stoyan AO; Mkhitaryan XE
    Sud Med Ekspert; 2023; 66(3):24-28. PubMed ID: 37192455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.