These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2019661)

  • 1. New indications for already-approved drugs: an analysis of regulatory review times.
    DiMasi JA; Kaitin KI; Fernandez-Carol C; Lasagna L
    J Clin Pharmacol; 1991 Mar; 31(3):205-15. PubMed ID: 2019661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Innovating by developing new uses of already-approved drugs: trends in the marketing approval of supplemental indications.
    DiMasi JA
    Clin Ther; 2013 Jun; 35(6):808-18. PubMed ID: 23726388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characteristics of Clinical Studies Used for US Food and Drug Administration Supplemental Indication Approvals of Drugs and Biologics, 2017 to 2019.
    Dhodapkar M; Zhang AD; Puthumana J; Downing NS; Shah ND; Ross JS
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Jun; 4(6):e2113224. PubMed ID: 34110392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New indications for already-approved drugs: time trends for the new drug application review phase.
    Spivey RN; Lasagna L; Trimble AG
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1987 Apr; 41(4):368-70. PubMed ID: 3829575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characteristics of efficacy evidence supporting approval of supplemental indications for prescription drugs in United States, 2005-14: systematic review.
    Wang B; Kesselheim AS
    BMJ; 2015 Sep; 351():h4679. PubMed ID: 26400844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical Evidence Supporting US Food and Drug Administration Approval of Otolaryngologic Prescription Drug Indications, 2005-2014.
    Rathi VK; Wang B; Ross JS; Downing NS; Kesselheim AS; Gray ST
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Apr; 156(4):683-692. PubMed ID: 28116974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Therapeutic ratings and end-of-phase II conferences: initiatives to accelerate the availability of important new drugs.
    Kaitin KI; Phelan NR; Raiford D; Morris B
    J Clin Pharmacol; 1991 Jan; 31(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 2045524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development times, clinical testing, postmarket follow-up, and safety risks for the new drugs approved by the US food and drug administration: the class of 2008.
    Moore TJ; Furberg CD
    JAMA Intern Med; 2014 Jan; 174(1):90-5. PubMed ID: 24166236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Timing and Characteristics of Cumulative Evidence Available on Novel Therapeutic Agents Receiving Food and Drug Administration Accelerated Approval.
    Naci H; Wouters OJ; Gupta R; Ioannidis JPA
    Milbank Q; 2017 Jun; 95(2):261-290. PubMed ID: 28589600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Postapproval studies of drugs initially approved by the FDA on the basis of limited evidence: systematic review.
    Pease AM; Krumholz HM; Downing NS; Aminawung JA; Shah ND; Ross JS
    BMJ; 2017 May; 357():j1680. PubMed ID: 28468750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Priority review drugs approved by the FDA and the EMA: time for international regulatory harmonization of pharmaceuticals?
    Alqahtani S; Seoane-Vazquez E; Rodriguez-Monguio R; Eguale T
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2015 Jul; 24(7):709-15. PubMed ID: 26013294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pediatric exclusivity: evolving legislation and novel complexities within pediatric therapeutic development.
    Rivera DR; Hartzema AG
    Ann Pharmacother; 2014 Mar; 48(3):369-79. PubMed ID: 24311725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. New drug development during and after a period of regulatory change: clinical research activity of major United States pharmaceutical firms, 1958 to 1979.
    May MS; Wardell WM; Lasagna L
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1983 Jun; 33(6):691-700. PubMed ID: 6851401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accelerated approval of oncology products: the food and drug administration experience.
    Johnson JR; Ning YM; Farrell A; Justice R; Keegan P; Pazdur R
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2011 Apr; 103(8):636-44. PubMed ID: 21422403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. FDA advisory committees and the new drug approval process.
    Kaitin KI; Melville A; Morris B
    J Clin Pharmacol; 1989 Oct; 29(10):886-90. PubMed ID: 2592579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of drugs for unlabeled indications.
    Erickson SH; Bergman JJ; Schneeweiss R; Cherkin DC
    JAMA; 1980 Apr; 243(15):1543-6. PubMed ID: 7359738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New drug development by United States pharmaceutical firms with analyses of trends in the acquisition and origin of drug candidates, 1963-1979.
    Wardell WM; May MS; Trimble AG
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1982 Oct; 32(4):407-17. PubMed ID: 7116754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Postmarketing Modifications of Drug Labels for Cancer Drugs Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration Between 2006 and 2016 With and Without Supporting Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Shepshelovich D; Tibau A; Goldvaser H; Molto C; Ocana A; Seruga B; Amir E
    J Clin Oncol; 2018 Jun; 36(18):1798-1804. PubMed ID: 29641296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Postmarketing studies for novel drugs approved by both the FDA and EMA between 2005 and 2010: a cross-sectional study.
    Zeitoun JD; Ross JS; Atal I; Vivot A; Downing NS; Baron G; Ravaud P
    BMJ Open; 2017 Dec; 7(12):e018587. PubMed ID: 29273664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Drug-review deadlines and safety problems.
    Carpenter D; Zucker EJ; Avorn J
    N Engl J Med; 2008 Mar; 358(13):1354-61. PubMed ID: 18367738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.