These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
26. Interinstitutional comparison of surgical biopsy diagnosis turnaround time: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 5384 surgical biopsies in 157 small hospitals. Novis DA; Zarbo RJ; Saladino AJ Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Nov; 122(11):951-6. PubMed ID: 9822122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. SNOMED CT encoded Cancer Protocols. Van Berkum MM AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2003; 2003():1039. PubMed ID: 14728542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Key issues in handling and reporting radical prostatectomy specimens. Srigley JR Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2006 Mar; 130(3):303-17. PubMed ID: 16519557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Resident preparation for practice: a white paper from the College of American Pathologists and Association of Pathology Chairs. Talbert ML; Ashwood ER; Brownlee NA; Clark JR; Horowitz RE; Lepoff RB; Neumann A; Otis CN; Powell SZ; Sodeman TM; ; Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2009 Jul; 133(7):1139-47. PubMed ID: 19642741 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Mammographically directed breast biopsies: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of clinical physician expectations and of specimen handling and reporting characteristics in 434 institutions. Nakhleh RE; Jones B; Zarbo RJ Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Jan; 121(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 9111087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Protocol for the examination of specimens removed from patients with esophageal carcinoma. A basis for checklists. The Cancer Committee, College of American Pathologists, and the Task Force on the Examination of Specimens From Patients With Esophageal Cancer. Lee RG; Compton CC Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Sep; 121(9):925-9. PubMed ID: 9302923 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Do the RCPath-published workload guidelines underestimate the work rate achievable in subspecialty practice in cellular pathology? Sanders SA; Carr RA; Roberts SE J Clin Pathol; 2009 May; 62(5):385-6. PubMed ID: 19398591 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Turnaround time for large or complex specimens in surgical pathology: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 56 institutions. Volmar KE; Idowu MO; Souers RJ; Karcher DS; Nakhleh RE Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2015 Feb; 139(2):171-7. PubMed ID: 25611100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Laboratory compliance with the American Society of Clinical Oncology/college of American Pathologists guidelines for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing: a College of American Pathologists survey of 757 laboratories. Nakhleh RE; Grimm EE; Idowu MO; Souers RJ; Fitzgibbons PL Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2010 May; 134(5):728-34. PubMed ID: 20441503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Immunohistochemistry validation procedures and practices: a College of American Pathologists survey of 727 laboratories. Hardy LB; Fitzgibbons PL; Goldsmith JD; Eisen RN; Beasley MB; Souers RJ; Nakhleh RE Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Jan; 137(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 23276171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Recommendations for the reporting of tissues removed as part of the surgical treatment of cutaneous melanoma. Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology. Virchows Arch; 1997 Aug; 431(2):79-81. PubMed ID: 9293888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. ATP-Ask the Pathologist: A Valuable Resource for Cancer Registrar and the College of American Pathologists Cancer Protocols. Gibson CA J Registry Manag; 2017; 44(2):78-9. PubMed ID: 29611690 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The wisdom behind cancer protocols. Compton CC; Hammond ME CAP Today; 2000 Dec; 14(12):11. PubMed ID: 11188343 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Surgical pathology examination of lymph nodes. Practice survey by American Society of Clinical Pathologists. Cousar JB Am J Clin Pathol; 1995 Aug; 104(2):126-32. PubMed ID: 7639185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Breast Specimen Processing and Reporting With an Emphasis on Margin Evaluation: A College of American Pathologists Survey of 866 Laboratories. Guidi AJ; Tworek JA; Mais DD; Souers RJ; Blond BJ; Brown RW Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2018 Apr; 142(4):496-506. PubMed ID: 29328775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]