These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20196746)

  • 1. Asymptotic distribution of the "orthogonal" quantitative transmission disequilibrium test in a structured population: exact formula.
    Boitard S; Mangin B; Azaïs JM
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2010; 9():Article 11. PubMed ID: 20196746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transmission/disequilibrium tests for quantitative traits.
    Zhu X; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Jan; 20(1):57-74. PubMed ID: 11119297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Removing phenotypic distribution assumptions from tests of linkage disequilibrium for quantitative traits.
    Alcaïs A; Abel L
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Apr; 24(3):191-9. PubMed ID: 12652523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A review of family-based tests for linkage disequilibrium between a quantitative trait and a genetic marker.
    Ewens WJ; Li M; Spielman RS
    PLoS Genet; 2008 Sep; 4(9):e1000180. PubMed ID: 18818728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tests for genetic association using family data.
    Shih MC; Whittemore AS
    Genet Epidemiol; 2002 Feb; 22(2):128-45. PubMed ID: 11788959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Increase in power of transmission-disequilibrium tests for quantitative traits.
    Malkin I; Ginsburg E; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2002 Oct; 23(3):234-44. PubMed ID: 12384976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Properties of the transmission-disequilibrium test in the presence of inbreeding.
    Génin E; Todorov AA; Clerget-Darpoux F
    Genet Epidemiol; 2002 Feb; 22(2):116-27. PubMed ID: 11788958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Method for using complete and incomplete trios to identify genes related to a quantitative trait.
    Kistner EO; Weinberg CR
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Jul; 27(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 15185401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A method for identifying genes related to a quantitative trait, incorporating multiple siblings and missing parents.
    Kistner EO; Weinberg CR
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 29(2):155-65. PubMed ID: 16025442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Power of QTL detection using association tests with family controls.
    Hernández-Sánchez J; Haley CS; Visscher PM
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2003 Nov; 11(11):819-27. PubMed ID: 14571265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exact transmission-disequilibrium tests with multiallelic markers.
    Cleves MA; Olson JM; Jacobs KB
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(4):337-47. PubMed ID: 9271708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving the power of association tests for quantitative traits in family studies.
    Diao G; Lin DY
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 May; 30(4):301-13. PubMed ID: 16607624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transmission disequilibrium test for quantitative trait loci detection in livestock populations.
    Kolbehdari D; Jansen GB; Schaeffer LR; Allen BO
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2006 Jun; 123(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 16706924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Linkage and association studies of QTL for nuclear families by mixed models.
    Fan R; Xiong M
    Biostatistics; 2003 Jan; 4(1):75-95. PubMed ID: 12925331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Association analysis of population-based quantitative trait data: an assessment of ANOVA.
    Ghosh S; De G
    Hum Hered; 2007; 64(1):82-8. PubMed ID: 17483600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robust transmission regression models for linkage and association.
    Schaid DJ; Rowland CM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000; 19 Suppl 1():S78-84. PubMed ID: 11055374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Statistical power of association using the extreme discordant phenotype design.
    Zhang G; Nebert DW; Chakraborty R; Jin L
    Pharmacogenet Genomics; 2006 Jun; 16(6):401-13. PubMed ID: 16708049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Asymptotic equivalence between two score tests for haplotype-specific risk in general linear models.
    Xie R; Stram DO
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 29(2):166-70. PubMed ID: 16025443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantifying the amount of missing information in genetic association studies.
    Nicolae DL
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 30(8):703-17. PubMed ID: 16986163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Power comparison of regression methods to test quantitative traits for association and linkage.
    Zhu X; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Apr; 18(4):322-30. PubMed ID: 10797592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.