291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20197084)
1. Intelligibility of interrupted and interleaved speech for normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implantees.
Gnansia D; Pressnitzer D; Péan V; Meyer B; Lorenzi C
Hear Res; 2010 Jun; 265(1-2):46-53. PubMed ID: 20197084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Bernstein JG; Grant KW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of binaural spectral resolution mismatch on Mandarin speech perception in simulated electric hearing.
Chen F; Wong LL; Tahmina Q; Azimi B; Hu Y
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):EL142-8. PubMed ID: 22894313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of periodic masker interruption on the intelligibility of interrupted speech.
Iyer N; Brungart DS; Simpson BD
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1693. PubMed ID: 17927429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The potential of onset enhancement for increased speech intelligibility in auditory prostheses.
Koning R; Wouters J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2569-81. PubMed ID: 23039450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of interferer facing orientation on speech perception by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Strelcyk O; Pentony S; Kalluri S; Edwards B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1419-32. PubMed ID: 24606279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of spatial separation, extended bandwidth, and compression speed on intelligibility in a competing-speech task.
Moore BC; Füllgrabe C; Stone MA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):360-71. PubMed ID: 20649230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Advantage of bimodal fitting in prosody perception for children using a cochlear implant and a hearing aid.
Straatman LV; Rietveld AC; Beijen J; Mylanus EA; Mens LH
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):1884-95. PubMed ID: 20968360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
Fink N; Furst M; Muchnik C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the fine structure processing (FSP) strategy and the CIS strategy used in the MED-EL cochlear implant system: speech intelligibility and music sound quality.
Magnusson L
Int J Audiol; 2011 Apr; 50(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 21190508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.
Summers V; Molis MR
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 15157127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities?
Neher T; Laugesen S; Jensen NS; Kragelund L
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1542-58. PubMed ID: 21895093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Phonemic restoration by hearing-impaired listeners with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss.
Başkent D; Eiler CL; Edwards B
Hear Res; 2010 Feb; 260(1-2):54-62. PubMed ID: 19922784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Understanding the effect of noise on electrical stimulation sequences in cochlear implants and its impact on speech intelligibility.
Qazi OU; van Dijk B; Moonen M; Wouters J
Hear Res; 2013 May; 299():79-87. PubMed ID: 23396271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
Phatak SA; Grant KW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The binaural intelligibility level difference in hearing-impaired listeners: the role of supra-threshold deficits.
Goverts ST; Houtgast T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 May; 127(5):3073-84. PubMed ID: 21117756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking.
Wang D; Kjems U; Pedersen MS; Boldt JB; Lunner T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):2336-47. PubMed ID: 19354408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Danish hearing in noise test.
Nielsen JB; Dau T
Int J Audiol; 2011 Mar; 50(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 21319937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
