291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20197084)
21. Speech recognition with varying numbers and types of competing talkers by normal-hearing, cochlear-implant, and implant simulation subjects.
Cullington HE; Zeng FG
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):450-61. PubMed ID: 18177173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Relationship between masking release in fluctuating maskers and speech reception thresholds in stationary noise.
Christiansen C; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1655-66. PubMed ID: 22978894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Speech masking release in listeners with flat hearing loss: effects of masker fluctuation rate on identification scores and phonetic feature reception.
Lorenzi C; Husson M; Ardoint M; Debruille X
Int J Audiol; 2006 Sep; 45(9):487-95. PubMed ID: 17005491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The perception of prosody and speaker gender in normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant recipients.
Meister H; Landwehr M; Pyschny V; Walger M; von Wedel H
Int J Audiol; 2009 Jan; 48(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 19173112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Weighting of cues for fricative place of articulation perception by children wearing cochlear implants.
Hedrick M; Bahng J; von Hapsburg D; Younger MS
Int J Audiol; 2011 Aug; 50(8):540-7. PubMed ID: 21604957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Contribution of consonant landmarks to speech recognition in simulated acoustic-electric hearing.
Chen F; Loizou PC
Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):259-67. PubMed ID: 20081538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Audiovisual asynchrony detection and speech intelligibility in noise with moderate to severe sensorineural hearing impairment.
Başkent D; Bazo D
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):582-92. PubMed ID: 21389856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of fluctuating maskers for speech recognition tests.
Francart T; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 21091261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Speech intelligibility in cochlear implant simulations: Effects of carrier type, interfering noise, and subject experience.
Whitmal NA; Poissant SF; Freyman RL; Helfer KS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2376-88. PubMed ID: 17902872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Modeling speech intelligibility in quiet and noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
Rhebergen KS; Lyzenga J; Dreschler WA; Festen JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1570-83. PubMed ID: 20329857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Development of a large-item environmental sound test and the effects of short-term training with spectrally-degraded stimuli.
Shafiro V
Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):775-90. PubMed ID: 18596641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Talker-listener accent interactions in speech-in-noise recognition: effects of prosodic manipulation as a function of language experience.
Pinet M; Iverson P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1357-65. PubMed ID: 20815470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Speech understanding in noise with an eyeglass hearing aid: asymmetric fitting and the head shadow benefit of anterior microphones.
Mens LH
Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 21047292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Measuring spectral and temporal resolution simultaneously: a comparison between two tests.
van Esch TE; Dreschler WA
Int J Audiol; 2011 Jul; 50(7):477-90. PubMed ID: 21506893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The influence of spectral characteristics of early reflections on speech intelligibility.
Arweiler I; Buchholz JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):996-1005. PubMed ID: 21877812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Phoneme recognition in modulated maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
Phatak SA; Grant KW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1646-54. PubMed ID: 22978893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effects of reverberation and masker fluctuations on binaural unmasking of speech.
George EL; Festen JM; Goverts ST
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1581-91. PubMed ID: 22978887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Contrasting benefits from contralateral implants and hearing aids in cochlear implant users.
van Hoesel RJ
Hear Res; 2012 Jun; 288(1-2):100-13. PubMed ID: 22226928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Improvement of intelligibility of ideal binary-masked noisy speech by adding background noise.
Cao S; Li L; Wu X
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Apr; 129(4):2227-36. PubMed ID: 21476677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
