BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

54 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20197174)

  • 1. Surface roughness of the restored enamel after orthodontic treatment.
    Ozer T; Başaran G; Kama JD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Mar; 137(3):368-74. PubMed ID: 20197174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Enamel surface roughness after debonding of orthodontic brackets and various clean-up techniques.
    Ahrari F; Akbari M; Akbari J; Dabiri G
    J Dent (Tehran); 2013 Jan; 10(1):82-93. PubMed ID: 23724206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Enamel Surface Integrity after De-Bracketing as Affected by Seven Different Orthodontic Residual Cement Removal Systems.
    Almudhi A; Aldeeri A; Aloraini AAA; Alomar AIM; Alqudairi MSM; Alzahrani OAA; Eldwakhly E; AlMugairin S
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Oct; 13(20):. PubMed ID: 37892104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Metal leakage from orthodontic appliances chemically alters enamel surface during experimental in vitro simulated treatment.
    Topolska JM; Jagielska A; Motyl S; Kozub-Budzyń GA; Kępa L; Wagner B; Wątor K
    Sci Rep; 2024 Mar; 14(1):5412. PubMed ID: 38443566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of enamel surface integrity after orthodontic bracket debonding: comparison of three different system.
    Ghaleb L; Al-Worafi NA; Thawaba A; Abdulqader AA; Alkamel A; Abdo Y; Yang Z; Noman N; Al-Aroomi MA; Yulou T
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):358. PubMed ID: 38509532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of enamel surface roughness and hardness with metal and ceramic orthodontic brackets using different etching and adhesive systems: An
    Zawawi RN; Almosa NA
    Saudi Dent J; 2023 Sep; 35(6):641-650. PubMed ID: 37817787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Influence of Various Adhesive Systems and Polishing Methods on Enamel Surface Roughness after Debonding of Orthodontic Brackets: A Three-Dimensional In Vitro Evaluation.
    Křivková T; Tichý A; Tycová H; Kučera J
    Materials (Basel); 2023 Jul; 16(14):. PubMed ID: 37512378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of enamel roughness after orthodontic debonding and clean-up procedures using zirconia, tungsten carbide, and white stone burs: an in vitro study.
    Thawaba AA; Albelasy NF; Elsherbini AM; Hafez AM
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jul; 23(1):478. PubMed ID: 37443027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative evaluation of three methods of adhesive remnant removal after orthodontic bracket debonding.
    Yassaei S; Joshan N; Abdolahy S; Abadi AHR
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2023; 27(6):e2220352. PubMed ID: 36995841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Comparative Evaluation of Enamel Surface Roughness of Two Different Bonding Adhesives After Debonding With Atomic Force Microscopy.
    Doddavarapu S; K B; Singaraju GS; Yamini Priyanka JS; Vivek Reddy G; Mandava P
    Cureus; 2022 Nov; 14(11):e31661. PubMed ID: 36420047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficacy of Bracket Adhesive Remnant Removal by a Fluorescence-Aided Identification Technique with a UV Light Handpiece:
    Moecke SE; Barros PCA; Andrade ACM; Borges AB; Pucci CR; Torres CRG
    Int J Dent; 2022; 2022():4821021. PubMed ID: 36249726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of traditional orthodontic polishing systems with composite polishing systems following orthodontic debonding.
    Melvin EA; Yu Q; Xu X; Laird CG; Armbruster PC; Ballard RW
    Saudi Dent J; 2021 Dec; 33(8):877-883. PubMed ID: 34938028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of Time Consumption for Debonding Brackets Using Different Techniques: A Hospital-Based Study.
    Bora N; Mahanta P; Konwar R; Basumatari B; Phukan C; Kalita D; Gojendra Singh S; Deka S
    J Healthc Eng; 2021; 2021():5567863. PubMed ID: 34476047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bond Strength of Metallic or Ceramic Orthodontic Brackets to Enamel, Acrylic, or Porcelain Surfaces.
    Pinho M; Manso MC; Almeida RF; Martin C; Carvalho Ó; Henriques B; Silva F; Pinhão Ferreira A; Souza JCM
    Materials (Basel); 2020 Nov; 13(22):. PubMed ID: 33213042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of the laser confocal scanning microscopy to measure resin remnants on customized lingual bracket.
    Kuskonmaz C; De Stefani A; Artioli G; Zanarini M; Bonetti GA; Bruno G; Gracco A
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 May; 20(1):142. PubMed ID: 32410609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of Erbium, Chromium-Doped: Yttrium, Scandium, Gallium, and Garnet and Erbium: Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet Laser Etching on Enamel Demineralization and Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets.
    Mollabashi V; Rezaei-Soufi L; Farhadian M; Noorani AR
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2019; 10(2):263-268. PubMed ID: 32308288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Erbium-Doped, Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet Laser Debonding of Porcelain Laminate Veneers: An
    Zhang Y; Rocca JP; Fornaini C; Zhen Y; Zhao Z; Merigo E
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2018; 9(4):570-573. PubMed ID: 31772464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of a Fluorescence-aided Identification Technique (FIT) to assist clean-up after orthodontic bracket debonding.
    Stadler O; Dettwiler C; Meller C; Dalstra M; Verna C; Connert T
    Angle Orthod; 2019 Nov; 89(6):876-882. PubMed ID: 31206307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An in vitro comparison of ultraviolet versus white light in the detection of adhesive remnants during orthodontic debonding.
    Lai C; Bush PJ; Warunek S; Covell DA; Al-Jewair T
    Angle Orthod; 2019 May; 89(3):438-445. PubMed ID: 30653333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.