549 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20198537)
1. Self-face recognition is characterized by "bilateral gain" and by faster, more accurate performance which persists when faces are inverted.
Keyes H; Brady N
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 May; 63(5):840-7. PubMed ID: 20198537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Categorical perception effects for facial identity in robustly represented familiar and self-faces: the role of configural and featural information.
Keyes H
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(4):760-72. PubMed ID: 22248095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of personal familiarity on early neuromagnetic correlates of face perception.
Kloth N; Dobel C; Schweinberger SR; Zwitserlood P; Bölte J; Junghöfer M
Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Dec; 24(11):3317-21. PubMed ID: 17156392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. N250 ERP correlates of the acquisition of face representations across different images.
Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR; Burton AM
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 18702593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interplay between familiarity and orientation in face processing: an ERP study.
Marzi T; Viggiano MP
Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Sep; 65(3):182-92. PubMed ID: 17512996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Recovery from adaptation to facial identity is larger for upright than inverted faces in the human occipito-temporal cortex.
Mazard A; Schiltz C; Rossion B
Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(6):912-22. PubMed ID: 16229867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The bilateral advantage for famous faces: interhemispheric communication or competition?
Baird LM; Burton AM
Neuropsychologia; 2008 Apr; 46(5):1581-7. PubMed ID: 18281066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The asymmetry of the fusiform face area is a stable individual characteristic that underlies the left-visual-field superiority for faces.
Yovel G; Tambini A; Brandman T
Neuropsychologia; 2008 Nov; 46(13):3061-8. PubMed ID: 18639566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Face recognition memory and configural processing: a developmental ERP study using upright, inverted, and contrast-reversed faces.
Itier RJ; Taylor MJ
J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Apr; 16(3):487-502. PubMed ID: 15072683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Unilateral damage to the right cerebral hemisphere disrupts the apprehension of whole faces and their component parts.
Wilkinson D; Ko P; Wiriadjaja A; Kilduff P; McGlinchey R; Milberg W
Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jun; 47(7):1701-11. PubMed ID: 19397865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Specificity of face processing without awareness.
Zhou G; Zhang L; Liu J; Yang J; Qu Z
Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):408-12. PubMed ID: 20116293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Recognising upright and inverted faces: MEG source localisation.
Taylor MJ; Bayless SJ; Mills T; Pang EW
Brain Res; 2011 Mar; 1381():167-74. PubMed ID: 21238433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hemispheric asymmetries in image-specific and abstractive priming of famous faces: evidence from reaction times and event-related brain potentials.
Cooper TJ; Harvey M; Lavidor M; Schweinberger SR
Neuropsychologia; 2007 Oct; 45(13):2910-21. PubMed ID: 17663008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The magnetoencephalographic response to upright and inverted face stimuli in a patient with Williams syndrome.
Nakamura M; Watanabe S; Gunji A; Kakigi R
Pediatr Neurol; 2006 May; 34(5):412-4. PubMed ID: 16648006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Inconsistent handedness and saccade execution benefit face memory without affecting interhemispheric interaction.
Lyle KB; Orsborn AE
Memory; 2011 Aug; 19(6):613-24. PubMed ID: 21919589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of repetition learning on upright, inverted and contrast-reversed face processing using ERPs.
Itier RJ; Taylor MJ
Neuroimage; 2004 Apr; 21(4):1518-32. PubMed ID: 15050576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. ERP study of viewpoint-independence in familiar-face recognition.
Miyakoshi M; Kanayama N; Nomura M; Iidaka T; Ohira H
Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Aug; 69(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 18474403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Early electrophysiological correlates of adaptation to personally familiar and unfamiliar faces across viewpoint changes.
Caharel S; Jacques C; d'Arripe O; Ramon M; Rossion B
Brain Res; 2011 Apr; 1387():85-98. PubMed ID: 21362409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cortical mechanisms of visual self-recognition.
Sugiura M; Watanabe J; Maeda Y; Matsue Y; Fukuda H; Kawashima R
Neuroimage; 2005 Jan; 24(1):143-9. PubMed ID: 15588605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Different fusiform activity to stranger and personally familiar faces in shy and social adults.
Beaton EA; Schmidt LA; Schulkin J; Antony MM; Swinson RP; Hall GB
Soc Neurosci; 2009; 4(4):308-16. PubMed ID: 19322727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
