194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20199108)
1. MUDE: a new approach for optimizing sensitivity in the target-decoy search strategy for large-scale peptide/protein identification.
Cerqueira FR; Graber A; Schwikowski B; Baumgartner C
J Proteome Res; 2010 May; 9(5):2265-77. PubMed ID: 20199108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comprehensive and reliable phosphorylation site mapping of individual phosphoproteins by combination of multiple stage mass spectrometric analysis with a target-decoy database search.
Han G; Ye M; Jiang X; Chen R; Ren J; Xue Y; Wang F; Song C; Yao X; Zou H
Anal Chem; 2009 Jul; 81(14):5794-805. PubMed ID: 19522514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Maximizing the sensitivity and reliability of peptide identification in large-scale proteomic experiments by harnessing multiple search engines.
Yu W; Taylor JA; Davis MT; Bonilla LE; Lee KA; Auger PL; Farnsworth CC; Welcher AA; Patterson SD
Proteomics; 2010 Mar; 10(6):1172-89. PubMed ID: 20101609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Instance based algorithm for posterior probability calculation by target-decoy strategy to improve protein identifications.
Jiang X; Dong X; Ye M; Zou H
Anal Chem; 2008 Dec; 80(23):9326-35. PubMed ID: 19551949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Artificial decoy spectral libraries for false discovery rate estimation in spectral library searching in proteomics.
Lam H; Deutsch EW; Aebersold R
J Proteome Res; 2010 Jan; 9(1):605-10. PubMed ID: 19916561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative evaluation of mass spectrometry platforms used in large-scale proteomics investigations.
Elias JE; Haas W; Faherty BK; Gygi SP
Nat Methods; 2005 Sep; 2(9):667-75. PubMed ID: 16118637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Support vector machines for improved peptide identification from tandem mass spectrometry database search.
Webb-Robertson BJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 492():453-60. PubMed ID: 19241051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An easy-to-use Decoy Database Builder software tool, implementing different decoy strategies for false discovery rate calculation in automated MS/MS protein identifications.
Reidegeld KA; Eisenacher M; Kohl M; Chamrad D; Körting G; Blüggel M; Meyer HE; Stephan C
Proteomics; 2008 Mar; 8(6):1129-37. PubMed ID: 18338823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improving sensitivity in shotgun proteomics using a peptide-centric database with reduced complexity: protease cleavage and SCX elution rules from data mining of MS/MS spectra.
Yen CY; Russell S; Mendoza AM; Meyer-Arendt K; Sun S; Cios KJ; Ahn NG; Resing KA
Anal Chem; 2006 Feb; 78(4):1071-84. PubMed ID: 16478097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimating the confidence of peptide identifications without decoy databases.
Renard BY; Timm W; Kirchner M; Steen JA; Hamprecht FA; Steen H
Anal Chem; 2010 Jun; 82(11):4314-8. PubMed ID: 20455556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Added value for tandem mass spectrometry shotgun proteomics data validation through isoelectric focusing of peptides.
Heller M; Ye M; Michel PE; Morier P; Stalder D; Jünger MA; Aebersold R; Reymond F; Rossier JS
J Proteome Res; 2005; 4(6):2273-82. PubMed ID: 16335976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. BuildSummary: using a group-based approach to improve the sensitivity of peptide/protein identification in shotgun proteomics.
Sheng Q; Dai J; Wu Y; Tang H; Zeng R
J Proteome Res; 2012 Mar; 11(3):1494-502. PubMed ID: 22217156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Speeding up tandem mass spectrometry based database searching by peptide and spectrum indexing.
Li Y; Chi H; Wang LH; Wang HP; Fu Y; Yuan ZF; Li SJ; Liu YS; Sun RX; Zeng R; He SM
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2010 Mar; 24(6):807-14. PubMed ID: 20187083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Database searching and accounting of multiplexed precursor and product ion spectra from the data independent analysis of simple and complex peptide mixtures.
Li GZ; Vissers JP; Silva JC; Golick D; Gorenstein MV; Geromanos SJ
Proteomics; 2009 Mar; 9(6):1696-719. PubMed ID: 19294629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis of the resolution limitations of peptide identification algorithms.
Colaert N; Degroeve S; Helsens K; Martens L
J Proteome Res; 2011 Dec; 10(12):5555-61. PubMed ID: 21995378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MUMAL: multivariate analysis in shotgun proteomics using machine learning techniques.
Cerqueira FR; Ferreira RS; Oliveira AP; Gomes AP; Ramos HJ; Graber A; Baumgartner C
BMC Genomics; 2012; 13 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S4. PubMed ID: 23095859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An improved method for the construction of decoy peptide MS/MS spectra suitable for the accurate estimation of false discovery rates.
Ahrné E; Ohta Y; Nikitin F; Scherl A; Lisacek F; Müller M
Proteomics; 2011 Oct; 11(20):4085-95. PubMed ID: 21898822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Elective affinities--bioinformatic analysis of proteomic mass spectrometry data.
Li X; Pizarro A; Grosser T
Arch Physiol Biochem; 2009 Dec; 115(5):311-9. PubMed ID: 19911947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A refined method to calculate false discovery rates for peptide identification using decoy databases.
Navarro P; Vázquez J
J Proteome Res; 2009 Apr; 8(4):1792-6. PubMed ID: 19714873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Increased confidence in large-scale phosphoproteomics data by complementary mass spectrometric techniques and matching of phosphopeptide data sets.
Alcolea MP; Kleiner O; Cutillas PR
J Proteome Res; 2009 Aug; 8(8):3808-15. PubMed ID: 19537829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
